Change search
CiteExportLink to record
Permanent link

Direct link
Cite
Citation style
  • apa
  • ieee
  • modern-language-association-8th-edition
  • vancouver
  • apa.csl
  • Other style
More styles
Language
  • de-DE
  • en-GB
  • en-US
  • fi-FI
  • nn-NO
  • nn-NB
  • sv-SE
  • Other locale
More languages
Output format
  • html
  • text
  • asciidoc
  • rtf
Effects of highway fencing and wildlife crossings on moose Alces alces movements and space use in southwestern Sweden
Karlstad University, Faculty of Social and Life Sciences, Department of Biology.
Karlstad University, Faculty of Social and Life Sciences, Department of Biology.
2008 (English)In: Wildlife Biology, ISSN 0909-6396, E-ISSN 1903-220X, Vol. 14, no 1, p. 111-117Article in journal (Refereed) Published
Abstract [en]

Use of exclusion fencing is an effective method to reduce moose-vehicle collisions, and exclusion fences are commonly erected along Swedish highways. However, exclusion fences may pose a threat to the viability of wildlife populations because they serve as barriers to individual movements and may limit accessibility to resources. Various types of wildlife crossings intended to reduce road-kills and increase habitat connectivity across fenced highways have been constructed throughout the world. However, few studies have evaluated the effectiveness of these crossing structures with respect to movements before, during and after construction of highways and exclusion fencing. We studied movements of 24 GPS-collared moose Alces alces before, during and after an existing two-lane road was reconstructed to a fenced four-lane highway with three wildlife crossings designed for moose. We recorded 135 movements across the highway during 8,830 moose-monitoring days. Of these, 47 occurred before the construction began, 76 occurred during the construction, and 12 occurred after the highway was fenced. All movements registered after the fencing occurred across two of the three wildlife crossings. The average number of highway crossings per moose-day decreased by 67-89% after fencing. The number of moose-vehicle collisions decreased after the exclusion fencing, but the fenced highway served as a barrier to moose movements even though three wildlife crossings were created. Thus, exclusion fencing may reduce moose mortality and provide safer conditions for automobile travellers, but the fencing may have a negative impact on moose accessibility to resources, gene flow and recolonisation rates.

Place, publisher, year, edition, pages
2008. Vol. 14, no 1, p. 111-117
Keywords [en]
Alces alces, barrier effect, exclusion fence, highway, moose, wildlife crossings
National Category
Ecology
Research subject
Biology
Identifiers
URN: urn:nbn:se:kau:diva-1897DOI: 10.2981/0909-6396(2008)14%5B111:EOHFAW%5D2.0.CO;2OAI: oai:DiVA.org:kau-1897DiVA, id: diva2:4936
Note
I manuskriptform hade denna artikel titeln "Effects of highway fencing and wildlife passagens on space use and movements of moose (Alces alces) in Southwestern Sweden"Available from: 2007-09-07 Created: 2007-09-07 Last updated: 2025-10-16Bibliographically approved
In thesis
1. The use of highway crossings to maintain landscape connectivity for moose and roe deer
Open this publication in new window or tab >>The use of highway crossings to maintain landscape connectivity for moose and roe deer
2007 (English)Doctoral thesis, comprehensive summary (Other scientific)
Abstract [en]

Increasingly wildlife managers and land managers are challenged to maintain the viability and connectivity among large mammal populations. Thus, it is important that effective highway crossings are identified and optimized with respect to construction cost, facilitation of ungulate movements, and ability to reduce wildlife-vehicle collisions. The use of exclusion fencing to reduce ungulate-vehicle collisions is commonly installed along Swedish highways. However, exclusion fences may pose a threat to the viability of wildlife populations because they serve as barriers to individual movements and may limit accessibility to resources. Various types of wildlife crossings intended to reduce road-kills and increase habitat connectivity across fenced highways have been constructed throughout the world. Previous studies have evaluated the importance of structure design and size for many ungulate species, but few studies involved moose (Alces alces) which is the target species for most large ungulate mitigations in Sweden. The results of the studies are intended to facilitate the development of wildlife crossings and conventional road passages to meet ungulate demands.

We monitored moose fitted with GPS radio collars and characterized their space and habitat use patterns in southwestern Sweden. Moose had seasonal differences in habitat selection within their home range, and generally preferred clear-cuts and early successional forest, boreal forest, and glades, but avoided agricultural areas and open water. We used infrared remote cameras, track surveys, and GPS telemetry to monitor the use of wildlife crossings and conventional road passages by moose and roe deer (Capreolus capreolus). The upgrading of a non-fenced road to a fenced highway with three wildlife crossings decreased the moose movements across the highway by 67-89 %. Overpass use by moose and roe deer declined with increased traffic volume on the highway and both species walked during periods of low highway traffic volumes and shifted to trotting as traffic intensity increased. Low rates of human disturbances and proximity to forest edges increased use of highway underpasses by roe deer. Moose used large underpasses to a higher degree than small.

Place, publisher, year, edition, pages
Fakulteten för samhälls- och livsvetenskaper, 2007
Series
Karlstad University Studies, ISSN 1403-8099 ; 2007:16
Keywords
wildlife crossings, Barrier effect, habitat selection, ecoduct, moose, roe deer, connectivity, conservation, overpass, underpass, highway, exclusion fencing
National Category
Biological Sciences
Research subject
Biology
Identifiers
urn:nbn:se:kau:diva-1143 (URN)978-91-7063-119-1 (ISBN)
Public defence
2007-06-08, Andersalen, 11D 121, 651 88, Karlstad, 13:15
Opponent
Supervisors
Available from: 2007-09-07 Created: 2007-09-07 Last updated: 2025-10-16

Open Access in DiVA

No full text in DiVA

Other links

Publisher's full text

Authority records

Olsson, MattiasWidén, Per

Search in DiVA

By author/editor
Olsson, MattiasWidén, Per
By organisation
Department of Biology
In the same journal
Wildlife Biology
Ecology

Search outside of DiVA

GoogleGoogle Scholar

doi
urn-nbn

Altmetric score

doi
urn-nbn
Total: 450 hits
CiteExportLink to record
Permanent link

Direct link
Cite
Citation style
  • apa
  • ieee
  • modern-language-association-8th-edition
  • vancouver
  • apa.csl
  • Other style
More styles
Language
  • de-DE
  • en-GB
  • en-US
  • fi-FI
  • nn-NO
  • nn-NB
  • sv-SE
  • Other locale
More languages
Output format
  • html
  • text
  • asciidoc
  • rtf