Change search
CiteExportLink to record
Permanent link

Direct link
Cite
Citation style
  • apa
  • ieee
  • modern-language-association-8th-edition
  • vancouver
  • apa.csl
  • Other style
More styles
Language
  • de-DE
  • en-GB
  • en-US
  • fi-FI
  • nn-NO
  • nn-NB
  • sv-SE
  • Other locale
More languages
Output format
  • html
  • text
  • asciidoc
  • rtf
[Manuscript] Nature-like versus technical fishways: combining fish counter and electrofishing data to evaluate passage effectiveness at the community level
Karlstad University, Faculty of Health, Science and Technology (starting 2013), Department of Environmental and Life Sciences (from 2013). (River Ecology and Management Research Group RivEM)ORCID iD: 0009-0007-5783-6895
(English)Manuscript (preprint) (Other academic)
Abstract [en]

River fragmentation by dams severely restricts fish migration, yet evaluations of fish passage solutions across species remain limited. We used data from 35 Swedish fishways (20 nature-like and 15 technical) combining optical fish counter observations (2013–2023) with electrofishing records (2008–2023) from adjacent river stretches to assess passage effectiveness on a community level. Nature-like fishways facilitated passage for significantly more fish species than technical fishways and had a higher upstream and downstream passage effectiveness. Specifically, species richness was on average 42 % higher in nature-like fishways for migratory species and 46 % for migratory and stationary species together. On average, 82 % of present migratory species passed upstream in nature-like versus 62 % in technical fishways, while downstream passage effectiveness averaged 81 % versus 55 %. Including stationary species illustrated the same trend, but at reduced effectiveness values. A few species were observed in more nature-like than in technical fishways (Lota lota moving upstream, Leuciscus idus and Rutilus rutilus moving downstream, overall observations of Alburnus alburnus), but data were scarce on the species level. Our results demonstrate that data from fish counter and electrofishing databases can be effectively integrated to assess fishway performance.

Keywords [en]
Fish passage solutions, upstream passage, downstream passage, fish counter, electrofishing, presence-absence, database
National Category
Ecology
Research subject
Biology; Environmental Science
Identifiers
URN: urn:nbn:se:kau:diva-110092OAI: oai:DiVA.org:kau-110092DiVA, id: diva2:2084518
Funder
EU, Horizon 2020, 860800Swedish Research Council Formas, 2025-01340Karlstad UniversityAvailable from: 2026-07-06 Created: 2026-07-06 Last updated: 2026-08-07Bibliographically approved
In thesis
1. Multi-species assessments of fishway performance
Open this publication in new window or tab >>Multi-species assessments of fishway performance
2026 (English)Doctoral thesis, comprehensive summary (Other academic)
Abstract [en]

Dams and weirs fragment rivers and restrict fish movements between essential habitats. Fishways are widely used to reduce these effects, but their presence alone does not ensure that connectivity has been functionally restored. Performance varies among species, life stages, seasons, and locations, while the conclusions drawn depend on the methods used.

This thesis examines fishway performance through four studies. First, methods for assessing upstream passage were reviewed. Qualitative methods like trapping or fish counters are suited to describing species composition and seasonal patterns, whereas individual-based methods like mark-recapture or telemetry are needed to estimate passage efficiencies and potential delays. Second, an eight-month telemetric field study was conducted to assess the performance of a vertical-slot fishway. Only two of seven species accounted for most passages, and success was size-dependent. Once these fish reached the monitored part of the fishway, most completed passage, highlighting the importance of the stages of attraction to and entry into the fishway, as well as individual motivation. Third, fish-counter observations from 35 fishways in Sweden were combined with electrofishing records from surrounding reaches. More species and higher community-level passage effectiveness were observed in nature-like fishways than in technical fishways. Fourth, analyses of fish-counter data from four of the fishways showed that movements of rarely assessed vimba were concentrated in spring and early summer but varied among rivers and years. The long-term data allowed movements to be related to seasonal state and short-term changes in water temperature and discharge.

The studies show that fishway passage is a multi-stage process that is usually only partly captured. Assessments should match biological and management objectives, distinguish potential factors, and ideally combine methods to evaluate functional connectivity across species, sites, and time.

Abstract [en]

Dams and weirs fragment rivers and can prevent fish from reaching habitats needed for feeding, refuge, and reproduction. Fishways are built to restore passage, but their presence alone does not guarantee functional connectivity.

This thesis examines how fishway performance can be assessed across species, sites, and time. A review of available methods showed that no single approach captures all relevant aspects of passage. A telemetric field study at a vertical-slot fishway found that passage differed among species and fish sizes and hinted at the importance of attraction, entry, and individual motivation. In Sweden, fish-counter and electrofishing data from 35 fishway locations showed that more species were observed and community-level passage effectiveness was higher in nature-like than in technical fishways. Long-term observations in four of these fishways showed that movements of the otherwise rarely recorded vimba were concentrated in spring and early summer and were related to seasonal state and short-term changes in temperature and discharge.

Together, the studies show that fishway passage is a multi-stage process that is usually only partly observed. Reliable assessment therefore requires clear management objectives and, ideally, combinations of methods.

Place, publisher, year, edition, pages
Karlstad: Karlstads universitet, 2026. p. 113
Series
Karlstad University Studies, ISSN 1403-8099 ; 2026:41
Keywords
fish migration, passage, fishway assessment, fishway effectiveness, connectivity, fish counter, telemetry, hydropower
National Category
Ecology Fish and Wildlife Management Environmental Sciences and Nature Conservation
Research subject
Biology
Identifiers
urn:nbn:se:kau:diva-110095 (URN)10.59217/oslb6924 (DOI)978-91-7867-739-9 (ISBN)978-91-7867-740-5 (ISBN)
Public defence
2026-09-18, 9C203, Universitetsgatan 2, Karlstad, 10:00 (English)
Opponent
Supervisors
Funder
EU, Horizon 2020, 860800
Note

© The Author. This work is licensed under CC BY 4.0 (https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/), unless otherwise stated.

Available from: 2026-08-28 Created: 2026-08-07 Last updated: 2026-08-28Bibliographically approved

Open Access in DiVA

No full text in DiVA

Authority records

Eggers, Florian

Search in DiVA

By author/editor
Eggers, Florian
By organisation
Department of Environmental and Life Sciences (from 2013)
Ecology

Search outside of DiVA

GoogleGoogle Scholar

urn-nbn

Altmetric score

urn-nbn
Total: 35 hits
CiteExportLink to record
Permanent link

Direct link
Cite
Citation style
  • apa
  • ieee
  • modern-language-association-8th-edition
  • vancouver
  • apa.csl
  • Other style
More styles
Language
  • de-DE
  • en-GB
  • en-US
  • fi-FI
  • nn-NO
  • nn-NB
  • sv-SE
  • Other locale
More languages
Output format
  • html
  • text
  • asciidoc
  • rtf