It is well-established that value framing can be a powerful rhetorical tool for politicians to influence voters' expectations of policies and muster support. The effects that such policy framing may have on people's reactions to subsequent policy information, however, remain largely unexplored. This paper addresses this question by investigating whether value framing of policy proposals can influence the aspects that people consider important when they receive (and evaluate) information regarding policy outcomes, as well as their satisfaction with them. A survey experiment (N = 2378) demonstrates that, when individuals have been exposed to information on outcomes, they sometimes consider the framed values more important than the actual policy measures. The experiment also indicates that value framing may sometimes influence satisfaction with the outcomes. However, these effects are in the positive rather than the hypothesized (negative) direction. Both effects primarily appear when the frames are charged with humanitarian values. Implications of the findings are discussed.