Change search
CiteExportLink to record
Permanent link

Direct link
Cite
Citation style
  • apa
  • ieee
  • modern-language-association-8th-edition
  • vancouver
  • apa.csl
  • Other style
More styles
Language
  • de-DE
  • en-GB
  • en-US
  • fi-FI
  • nn-NO
  • nn-NB
  • sv-SE
  • Other locale
More languages
Output format
  • html
  • text
  • asciidoc
  • rtf
Appeal to morality or monitor and punish?: Attitudes toward academic dishonesty among Swedish health science students
Karlstad University, Faculty of Health, Science and Technology (starting 2013), Department of Health Sciences (from 2013).ORCID iD: 0000-0001-8348-9734
Karlstad University, Faculty of Arts and Social Sciences (starting 2013), Department of Social and Psychological Studies (from 2013).ORCID iD: 0000-0001-7180-0783
Karlstad University, Faculty of Health, Science and Technology (starting 2013), Department of Health Sciences (from 2013).
2025 (English)In: Discover Education, ISSN 2731-5525, Vol. 4, no 1, article id 97Article in journal (Refereed) Published
Abstract [en]

Academic dishonesty is a growing problem in higher education. This study examines students’ attitudes toward cheating. The sample consisted of 318 students enrolled in health science courses at a Swedish university. A survey-based quantitative approach was employed, integrating qualitative responses from open-ended questions. We investigated students’ overall attitudes, circumstances leading to cheating, the relationship between exam type and cheating tendencies, and level of awareness regarding university policies. The results show that 14.9% cheated, particularly on take-home assignments. Younger students and students at all ages further along in their education were more likely to cheat on these assignments. The qualitative responses revealed a pattern between the formal measures provided by the university and the students’ personal values and integrity related to academic honesty. The respondents believed that proctoring measures were the most effective in preventing cheating, while they had less confidence in measures based on trusting the conscience and sense of honor of students. It was also found that during the COVID-19 pandemic, students taking exams at home were more likely to cheat than those taking on-campus exams. The findings highlight the need for a balanced approach combining technological systems of monitoring and control with proactive strategies aimed at promoting academic integrity. 

Place, publisher, year, edition, pages
Discover , 2025. Vol. 4, no 1, article id 97
Keywords [en]
Academic dishonesty, Academic integrity, Attitudes, Examinations
National Category
Pedagogy
Research subject
Public Health Science; Psychology
Identifiers
URN: urn:nbn:se:kau:diva-104761DOI: 10.1007/s44217-025-00489-4Scopus ID: 2-s2.0-105003924755OAI: oai:DiVA.org:kau-104761DiVA, id: diva2:1964346
Available from: 2025-06-04 Created: 2025-06-04 Last updated: 2026-02-12Bibliographically approved

Open Access in DiVA

No full text in DiVA

Other links

Publisher's full textScopus

Authority records

Holm, PatrikTerp, UlrikAlfredsson, Christina Fjaeraa

Search in DiVA

By author/editor
Holm, PatrikTerp, UlrikAlfredsson, Christina Fjaeraa
By organisation
Department of Health Sciences (from 2013)Department of Social and Psychological Studies (from 2013)
Pedagogy

Search outside of DiVA

GoogleGoogle Scholar

doi
urn-nbn

Altmetric score

doi
urn-nbn
Total: 123 hits
CiteExportLink to record
Permanent link

Direct link
Cite
Citation style
  • apa
  • ieee
  • modern-language-association-8th-edition
  • vancouver
  • apa.csl
  • Other style
More styles
Language
  • de-DE
  • en-GB
  • en-US
  • fi-FI
  • nn-NO
  • nn-NB
  • sv-SE
  • Other locale
More languages
Output format
  • html
  • text
  • asciidoc
  • rtf