Change search
CiteExportLink to record
Permanent link

Direct link
Cite
Citation style
  • apa
  • ieee
  • modern-language-association-8th-edition
  • vancouver
  • apa.csl
  • Other style
More styles
Language
  • de-DE
  • en-GB
  • en-US
  • fi-FI
  • nn-NO
  • nn-NB
  • sv-SE
  • Other locale
More languages
Output format
  • html
  • text
  • asciidoc
  • rtf
Dialogue and defamiliarization: The conceptual framing of an intervention for challenging readers and improving the quality of literature discussions
Karlstad University, Faculty of Arts and Social Sciences (starting 2013), Department of Educational Studies (from 2013).ORCID iD: 0000-0002-9375-9512
Linköping University, Sweden.
University of Stavanger, Norway.
2023 (English)In: L1-Educational Studies in Language and Literature, ISSN 1567-6617, E-ISSN 1573-1731, Vol. 23, no 2, p. 1-24Article in journal (Refereed) Published
Abstract [en]

To lead discussions about complex literary texts in a classroom of teenagers is no doubt a challenging task for many teachers. It is therefore meaningful to explore how teachers' management of literature discussions can be supported and improved. Prior research indicates a positive relationship between certain modes of discussion and increased literary awareness. Yet observational studies underscore that openended, probing discussions about literature are scarce in today's classrooms. This article elaborates the theoretical framing of an intervention designed to improve the quality of teacher-led discussions about complex literary texts. We argue that dialogic theory, appropriate for highlighting the processes of classroom interaction, needs to be supplemented by theory that offers an explanation for the role of the literary text and its impact on both readers and their interaction processes. For this purpose, we examine the conceptual matching between theory of dialogic teaching, drawing on Bakhtin's idea of meaning making as inherently dialogic, and theories of literary response, specifically Shklovsky's concept defamiliarization and recent didactical analysis of Derrida's concept undecidability. The intention of the paper is to suggest a theoretical framing of the intervention, one that allows for both analysis of the aesthetic processes of reading and talking about literature, and specific guidance of teachers' management of those discussions.

Place, publisher, year, edition, pages
International Association for Research in L1 Education (ARLE) , 2023. Vol. 23, no 2, p. 1-24
Keywords [en]
Defamiliarization, Dialogic teaching, Narrative complexity, Literature discussions, Undecidability
National Category
Educational Sciences General Literature Studies
Research subject
Educational Work
Identifiers
URN: urn:nbn:se:kau:diva-98553DOI: 10.21248/l1esll.2023.23.2.566ISI: 001147088300001Scopus ID: 2-s2.0-85185272181OAI: oai:DiVA.org:kau-98553DiVA, id: diva2:1838374
Available from: 2024-02-16 Created: 2024-02-16 Last updated: 2025-10-16Bibliographically approved

Open Access in DiVA

No full text in DiVA

Other links

Publisher's full textScopus

Authority records

Tengberg, Michael

Search in DiVA

By author/editor
Tengberg, Michael
By organisation
Department of Educational Studies (from 2013)
In the same journal
L1-Educational Studies in Language and Literature
Educational SciencesGeneral Literature Studies

Search outside of DiVA

GoogleGoogle Scholar

doi
urn-nbn

Altmetric score

doi
urn-nbn
Total: 197 hits
CiteExportLink to record
Permanent link

Direct link
Cite
Citation style
  • apa
  • ieee
  • modern-language-association-8th-edition
  • vancouver
  • apa.csl
  • Other style
More styles
Language
  • de-DE
  • en-GB
  • en-US
  • fi-FI
  • nn-NO
  • nn-NB
  • sv-SE
  • Other locale
More languages
Output format
  • html
  • text
  • asciidoc
  • rtf