2223242526272825 of 41
CiteExportLink to record
Permanent link

Direct link
Cite
Citation style
  • apa
  • ieee
  • modern-language-association-8th-edition
  • vancouver
  • apa.csl
  • Other style
More styles
Language
  • de-DE
  • en-GB
  • en-US
  • fi-FI
  • nn-NO
  • nn-NB
  • sv-SE
  • Other locale
More languages
Output format
  • html
  • text
  • asciidoc
  • rtf
Nurse's scope of practice in home-based care: a qualitative descriptive design - the DECIDE project
Lovisenberg Diaconal Univ Coll, Dept Undergrad Studies, Lovisenberggata 15B, NO-0456 Oslo, Norway.;Karlstad Univ, Inst Hlth Sci, Fac Hlth Nature & Tech Sci, Dept Nursing, Universitetsgatan 2, S-65188 Karlstad, Sweden..
Karlstad University, Faculty of Health, Science and Technology (starting 2013), Department of Health Sciences (from 2013).
Lovisenberg Diaconal Univ Coll, Dept Undergrad Studies, Lovisenberggata 15B, NO-0456 Oslo, Norway..
Lovisenberg Diaconal Univ Coll, Dept Undergrad Studies, Lovisenberggata 15B, NO-0456 Oslo, Norway..
Show others and affiliations
2026 (English)In: BMC Nursing, E-ISSN 1472-6955, Vol. 25, no 1, article id 425Article in journal (Refereed) Published
Abstract [en]

Background Nurses' understanding of their scope of practice is essential for coordinating safe and optimal home-based care for older people with complex needs. Contextual modulators, workload pressures, and limited opportunities for clinical leadership may hinder enactment of core aspects of this scope. Uncertainty regarding nurses' scope of practice persists, particularly in home-based care. The aim of this study was to explore how nurses experience their own and each other's scopes of practice, and what characterises their scope of practice in home-based care. Methods A qualitative descriptive design using focused individual interviews was employed with eight registered nurses and eight non-registered nurses from three home-based nursing teams in south-east Norway. Although interviews were conducted individually, data were analysed dyadically using an adapted Framework Method to enable systematic comparison of perspectives. Results Nurses' scope of practice was characterised by ongoing clinical observation, assessment, and response to change, supported by continuity of visits and in-depth knowledge of service users. Activities ranged from household chores and basic care to advanced clinical procedures, with substantial overlap between the nurses. Registered nurses articulated greater analytic depth and system-level accountability. Despite shared conceptual understandings, nurses experienced a parallel scope of practice with divergent responsibilities. Registered nurses assumed primary accountability in acute, complex, and transitional care situations, and tensions were evident regarding responsibility distribution and decision-making. Conclusions Scope of practice in home-based care was dynamic and context-dependent, enacted through an embodied nursing process reflecting rapid, experience-based cognition and analytic decision-making. Although nurses described shared understandings, enactment involved overlapping activities alongside distinct responsibilities. Registered nurses' scope of practice extended beyond direct care to coordination, clinical leadership, and accountability for care completion. These findings highlight risks of implicit responsibility shifting and emphasise the need to clearly define and empirically ground nurses' scope of practice to support safe practice, leadership, workforce sustainability, and future research on continuity, responsibility, and decision-making in complex care settings.

Place, publisher, year, edition, pages
Springer Nature, 2026. Vol. 25, no 1, article id 425
Keywords [en]
Activities, Clinical decision-making, Continuity of care, Dyadic analysis, Framework analysis, Non-registered nursing staff, Nursing process, Qualitative research, Registered nurses, Role
National Category
Nursing
Research subject
Nursing Science
Identifiers
URN: urn:nbn:se:kau:diva-110206DOI: 10.1186/s12912-026-04590-3ISI: 001758185500002PubMedID: 41904494Scopus ID: 2-s2.0-105039169546OAI: oai:DiVA.org:kau-110206DiVA, id: diva2:2061724
Available from: 2026-05-22 Created: 2026-05-22 Last updated: 2026-05-29Bibliographically approved

Open Access in DiVA

fulltext(1223 kB)11 downloads
File information
File name FULLTEXT01.pdfFile size 1223 kBChecksum SHA-512
35b29c88538d0016e066daf3d663932a704d73dabcfddcf2b9d3e5cad26138cbd5265d0ecd27214ec8b90b1f1c301962bb2b2ee2414f4fc75207cc62ed3ff46b
Type fulltextMimetype application/pdf

Other links

Publisher's full textPubMedScopus

Authority records

Pavedahl, VeronicaEklund, Anna Josse

Search in DiVA

By author/editor
Pavedahl, VeronicaEklund, Anna Josse
By organisation
Department of Health Sciences (from 2013)
In the same journal
BMC Nursing
Nursing

Search outside of DiVA

GoogleGoogle Scholar
The number of downloads is the sum of all downloads of full texts. It may include eg previous versions that are now no longer available

doi
pubmed
urn-nbn

Altmetric score

doi
pubmed
urn-nbn
Total: 66 hits
2223242526272825 of 41
CiteExportLink to record
Permanent link

Direct link
Cite
Citation style
  • apa
  • ieee
  • modern-language-association-8th-edition
  • vancouver
  • apa.csl
  • Other style
More styles
Language
  • de-DE
  • en-GB
  • en-US
  • fi-FI
  • nn-NO
  • nn-NB
  • sv-SE
  • Other locale
More languages
Output format
  • html
  • text
  • asciidoc
  • rtf