Change search
CiteExportLink to record
Permanent link

Direct link
Cite
Citation style
  • apa
  • ieee
  • modern-language-association-8th-edition
  • vancouver
  • apa.csl
  • Other style
More styles
Language
  • de-DE
  • en-GB
  • en-US
  • fi-FI
  • nn-NO
  • nn-NB
  • sv-SE
  • Other locale
More languages
Output format
  • html
  • text
  • asciidoc
  • rtf
Prey DNA Detection in Lycosid Spiders Is Primarily Influenced by Time Since Feeding and Primer Choice
Karlstad University, Faculty of Health, Science and Technology (starting 2013), Department of Environmental and Life Sciences (from 2013).ORCID iD: 0000-0002-6011-8540
Karlstad University, Faculty of Health, Science and Technology (starting 2013), Department of Environmental and Life Sciences (from 2013).ORCID iD: 0000-0002-6205-611x
Karlstad University, Faculty of Health, Science and Technology (starting 2013), Department of Environmental and Life Sciences (from 2013).ORCID iD: 0000-0003-2220-1615
Karlstad University, Faculty of Health, Science and Technology (starting 2013), Department of Health Sciences (from 2013). Karlstad University, Faculty of Health, Science and Technology (starting 2013), Department of Environmental and Life Sciences (from 2013).ORCID iD: 0000-0002-3813-9548
2026 (English)In: Entomologia Experimentalis et Applicata, ISSN 0013-8703, E-ISSN 1570-7458Article in journal (Refereed) Epub ahead of print
Abstract [en]

Gut content analysis of common predators such as spiders using DNA metabarcoding has facilitated the understanding of community level predator-prey relationships in ecosystems. To interpret the DNA metabarcoding result correctly knowledge of different factors influencing persistence of prey DNA in the predator gut is crucial. Our study investigated four such factors; i.e., the effects of (1) starvation time prior to feeding; (2) time elapsed since feeding; (3) spider size; and (4) presence of egg sacs or spiderlings on the detection rate of prey DNA in the gut contents of field-collected Lycosidae spiders. We performed feeding trials in a controlled lab environment and analyzed predator gut content data using PCR and DNA metabarcoding techniques. We used two primer combinations (NoSpi2 with BR2 or fwhR2n) and three different prey species Drosophila hydei, Gryllus bimaculatus, and Coecobrya tenebricosa in our feeding trials. The NoSpi2-fwhR2n primer combination was more effective at amplifying a PCR product of the correct size compared to the NoSpi2-BR2 combination and was therefore used for the DNA metabarcoding. The results showed that time since feeding significantly influenced the detection rate of Drosophila and Gryllus DNA, with longer time intervals leading to decreased detection odds. Spider size, starvation time, and the presence of egg sacs or spiderlings had minimal or no influence on prey detection. This study highlights the importance of considering different factors that influence prey DNA detection in spider diet studies and using appropriate primers. Future research should account for variables such as prior gut contents, starvation period, and their potential interaction with spider metabolic rate.

Place, publisher, year, edition, pages
John Wiley & Sons, 2026.
Keywords [en]
gut content analysis, Lycosidae, metabarcoding, Pardosa, prey half-life
National Category
Ecology Zoology
Research subject
Biology
Identifiers
URN: urn:nbn:se:kau:diva-109569DOI: 10.1111/eea.70091ISI: 001727606100001Scopus ID: 2-s2.0-105034182615OAI: oai:DiVA.org:kau-109569DiVA, id: diva2:2051171
Available from: 2026-04-07 Created: 2026-04-07 Last updated: 2026-04-20Bibliographically approved

Open Access in DiVA

fulltext(443 kB)12 downloads
File information
File name FULLTEXT01.pdfFile size 443 kBChecksum SHA-512
9197f9078e9326716e5ca7892d84bf180dedaa3ddf118e1def8e010c7cceaae51738242d4f5ab78957b4141ba93fc214d948c9af0f54403de96c598ac40255ba
Type fulltextMimetype application/pdf

Other links

Publisher's full textScopus

Authority records

Marker, JefferyLafage, DenisBergman, EvaErlandsson, Ann

Search in DiVA

By author/editor
Marker, JefferyLafage, DenisBergman, EvaErlandsson, Ann
By organisation
Department of Environmental and Life Sciences (from 2013)Department of Health Sciences (from 2013)
In the same journal
Entomologia Experimentalis et Applicata
EcologyZoology

Search outside of DiVA

GoogleGoogle Scholar
The number of downloads is the sum of all downloads of full texts. It may include eg previous versions that are now no longer available

doi
urn-nbn

Altmetric score

doi
urn-nbn
Total: 187 hits
CiteExportLink to record
Permanent link

Direct link
Cite
Citation style
  • apa
  • ieee
  • modern-language-association-8th-edition
  • vancouver
  • apa.csl
  • Other style
More styles
Language
  • de-DE
  • en-GB
  • en-US
  • fi-FI
  • nn-NO
  • nn-NB
  • sv-SE
  • Other locale
More languages
Output format
  • html
  • text
  • asciidoc
  • rtf