The rapid growth, large volume, and easy access to publicly available netnographic data have increased the need for understanding its potential in leveraging innovation. At the heart of quality management is a focus on customers and their needs, driving the innovation of products and services. In this study, we systematically compare netnography and focus groups as research methods regarding their ability to capture various types of customer needs. This study makes four valuable contributions to quality management theory: (1) netnography and focus groups captures similar customer needs, (2) netnography provides clear need statements, which are rich and overrepresented compared to focus groups, (3) both netnography and focus groups are vulnerable to groupthink, where customers prioritize consensus; however, this effect is more evident in netnography, (4) netnography captures more need statements about current product and service usage, while focus groups focus more on past product and service usage.