Operational message
There are currently operational disruptions. Troubleshooting is in progress.
Change search
CiteExportLink to record
Permanent link

Direct link
Cite
Citation style
  • apa
  • ieee
  • modern-language-association-8th-edition
  • vancouver
  • apa.csl
  • Other style
More styles
Language
  • de-DE
  • en-GB
  • en-US
  • fi-FI
  • nn-NO
  • nn-NB
  • sv-SE
  • Other locale
More languages
Output format
  • html
  • text
  • asciidoc
  • rtf
The electoral choices of voters with coalition-straddling consideration sets
Göteborgs universitet.
Karlstad University, Faculty of Arts and Social Sciences (starting 2013), Department of Political, Historical, Religious and Cultural Studies (from 2013).ORCID iD: 0000-0003-0820-8626
2020 (English)In: Social Science Quarterly, ISSN 0038-4941, E-ISSN 1540-6237, Vol. 101, no 4, p. 1303-1313Article in journal, Letter (Refereed) Published
Abstract [en]

Objectives

Preelectoral party coalitions are common in multiparty systems. We examine the proposition that individuals who choose between parties from competing coalitions think and behave differently compared to those who only consider voting for parties of the same coalition. Part of the reason, we suggest, is that coalition‐straddling voters play a key role in deciding who forms government.

Methods

We rely on data from a multiwave panel with thousands of participants collected during two election campaigns in Sweden. Statistical regression techniques are used to analyze the data.

Results

We find that citizens who straddle opposing coalitions think that the vote decision is harder and rely more on voting advice applications. Moreover, the evidence suggests that their ultimate vote choice is more consequential in how they view parties.

Conclusion

Coalition‐straddling influences political behavior. The evidence is largely in line with the notion that coalition‐straddling individuals are aware of their importance.

Place, publisher, year, edition, pages
John Wiley & Sons, 2020. Vol. 101, no 4, p. 1303-1313
Keywords [en]
consideration sets, coalition-straddling, electoral behavior
National Category
Political Science
Research subject
Political Science
Identifiers
URN: urn:nbn:se:kau:diva-78129DOI: 10.1111/ssqu.12813ISI: 000539126600001Scopus ID: 2-s2.0-85086176932OAI: oai:DiVA.org:kau-78129DiVA, id: diva2:1439027
Funder
Riksbankens JubileumsfondAvailable from: 2020-06-11 Created: 2020-06-11 Last updated: 2026-02-12Bibliographically approved

Open Access in DiVA

fulltext(501 kB)238 downloads
File information
File name FULLTEXT01.pdfFile size 501 kBChecksum SHA-512
7950caa62b4cfd4d31fcae9a8a65aeb787dcfd4d24579c64bb1bb09a3fda4fff5dcc96570c6cb2c19a4ea6f07ed9f3eb828f081ed6d2b60ace880d7a9b866739
Type fulltextMimetype application/pdf

Other links

Publisher's full textScopus

Authority records

Fredén, Annika

Search in DiVA

By author/editor
Fredén, Annika
By organisation
Department of Political, Historical, Religious and Cultural Studies (from 2013)
In the same journal
Social Science Quarterly
Political Science

Search outside of DiVA

GoogleGoogle Scholar
Total: 238 downloads
The number of downloads is the sum of all downloads of full texts. It may include eg previous versions that are now no longer available

doi
urn-nbn

Altmetric score

doi
urn-nbn
Total: 377 hits
CiteExportLink to record
Permanent link

Direct link
Cite
Citation style
  • apa
  • ieee
  • modern-language-association-8th-edition
  • vancouver
  • apa.csl
  • Other style
More styles
Language
  • de-DE
  • en-GB
  • en-US
  • fi-FI
  • nn-NO
  • nn-NB
  • sv-SE
  • Other locale
More languages
Output format
  • html
  • text
  • asciidoc
  • rtf