Endre søk
RefereraExporteraLink to record
Permanent link

Direct link
Referera
Referensformat
  • apa
  • ieee
  • modern-language-association-8th-edition
  • vancouver
  • apa.csl
  • Annet format
Fler format
Språk
  • de-DE
  • en-GB
  • en-US
  • fi-FI
  • nn-NO
  • nn-NB
  • sv-SE
  • Annet språk
Fler språk
Utmatningsformat
  • html
  • text
  • asciidoc
  • rtf
Round and Round We Go: the effects of staff turnover on disaster risk governance
Karlstads universitet, Fakulteten för hälsa, natur- och teknikvetenskap (from 2013), Centrum för klimat och säkerhet (from 2013). Karlstads universitet, Fakulteten för hälsa, natur- och teknikvetenskap (from 2013), Institutionen för miljö- och livsvetenskaper (from 2013). Centre of Natural Hazards and Disaster Science, CNDS.ORCID-id: 0000-0002-5514-8374
(engelsk)Manuskript (preprint) (Annet (populærvitenskap, debatt, mm))
HSV kategori
Identifikatorer
URN: urn:nbn:se:kau:diva-69141OAI: oai:DiVA.org:kau-69141DiVA, id: diva2:1246680
Tilgjengelig fra: 2018-09-09 Laget: 2018-09-09 Sist oppdatert: 2026-02-12bibliografisk kontrollert
Inngår i avhandling
1. Navigating in the Midst of Uncertainties: Challenges in Disaster Risk Governance in Mozambique
Åpne denne publikasjonen i ny fane eller vindu >>Navigating in the Midst of Uncertainties: Challenges in Disaster Risk Governance in Mozambique
2018 (engelsk)Doktoravhandling, med artikler (Annet vitenskapelig)
Abstract [en]

Disasters cause heavy losses for societies and may quickly erode any development efforts. Consequently, disaster risk reduction (DRR) is an integral part of development work that should be addressed at multiple levels. Global DRR frameworks, scholars and practitioners all advocate disaster risk governance (DRG) strategies that are multi-stakeholder, polycentric and multisectoral. While various substantive knowledge gaps and questions arising from multiple risks and the crosscutting nature of DRR have been relatively well addressed, uncertainties relating to multiple DRR actors operating and collaborating at different scales have gained less attention in previous studies.

This thesis investigates the uncertainties in DRG in Mozambique, a low-income country that regularly faces natural hazards. These hazards often cause heavy loss of life and livelihoods and economic damage. The four articles that together constitute this thesis focus on different sets of uncertainties and factors that have constrained or allowed Mozambique to take major steps in this policy area. By exploring strategic and institutional uncertainties related to stakeholder involvement, coordination and policy disputes, this thesis reveals different challenges and opportunities that affect DRR policymaking in Mozambique.

This thesis concludes that Mozambique has managed to take important steps in DRR. However, as a consequence of the different challenges to DRR practice in Mozambique, policymaking can be short-sighted and makes slow progress, thus increasing the disconnect between theory, policies and practice. This thesis thus argues that DRG research and practice need to better take into account power-relations; coordination and capacity issues; and responsibilities and transparency across scales, both in Mozambique and elsewhere.

Abstract [en]

Global disaster risk reduction (DRR) frameworks, scholars and practitioners advocate multi-stakeholder, polycentric and multisectoral strategies for disaster risk governance (DRG). However, previous studies have not adequately addressed uncertainties relating to multiple DRR actors operating and collaborating at different scales. This thesis investigates the uncertainties in DRG in Mozambique, a low-income country that regularly faces natural hazards that often cause heavy loss of life and livelihoods and economic damage. The four articles that together constitute this thesis focus on different sets of uncertainties and factors that have constrained or allowed Mozambique to take major steps in this policy area. By exploring uncertainties related to stakeholder involvement, coordination and policy disputes, this thesis reveals different challenges and opportunities that affect DRR policymaking in Mozambique. This thesis concludes that Mozambique has managed to take important steps in DRR. However, as a consequence of the different challenges to DRR practice in Mozambique, policymaking can be short-sighted and makes slow progress, thus increasing the disconnect between theory, policies and practice. It thus calls for increased attention to be paid to DRG in Mozambique and elsewhere.

sted, utgiver, år, opplag, sider
Karlstad: Karlstads universitet, 2018. s. 83
Serie
Karlstad University Studies, ISSN 1403-8099 ; 2018:39
Emneord
disaster risk governance, Mozambique, disaster risk reduction
HSV kategori
Forskningsprogram
Risk- och Miljöstudier
Identifikatorer
urn:nbn:se:kau:diva-69145 (URN)978-91-7063-875-6 (ISBN)978-91-7063-970-8 (ISBN)
Disputas
2018-10-26, Nyquistsalen, 9C 203, Karlstads universitet, Karlstad, 13:00 (engelsk)
Opponent
Veileder
Tilgjengelig fra: 2018-10-08 Laget: 2018-09-09 Sist oppdatert: 2026-02-12bibliografisk kontrollert

Open Access i DiVA

Fulltekst mangler i DiVA

Person

Koivisto, Jenni

Søk i DiVA

Av forfatter/redaktør
Koivisto, Jenni
Av organisasjonen

Søk utenfor DiVA

GoogleGoogle Scholar

urn-nbn

Altmetric

urn-nbn
Totalt: 277 treff
RefereraExporteraLink to record
Permanent link

Direct link
Referera
Referensformat
  • apa
  • ieee
  • modern-language-association-8th-edition
  • vancouver
  • apa.csl
  • Annet format
Fler format
Språk
  • de-DE
  • en-GB
  • en-US
  • fi-FI
  • nn-NO
  • nn-NB
  • sv-SE
  • Annet språk
Fler språk
Utmatningsformat
  • html
  • text
  • asciidoc
  • rtf