Open this publication in new window or tab >>2025 (English)Conference paper, Oral presentation only (Refereed)
Abstract [en]
The research topic concerns specific conditions and forms of leadership from the perspective of Swedish culture school leaders. It is part of a larger project that also includes folk high school principals with the same aim to explore leadership.
The theoretical framework used in this study is discourse theory (Wetherell & Potter, 1992; Billig, 1988, 2005) for survey data and the narrative approach for interview data (Polkinghorne, 1995; Elliott, 2005).The research design includes semi-structured web surveys and group interviews via Zoom conducted in 2023-24. Of 277 culture school leaders, 114 responded to the survey, giving a response rate of 41.16 percent. Eight of these participated in group interviews, totaling 1,5 hours, split into three groups. The survey questions were both multiple-choice and open-ended, for example: “Most important mission of the culture school,” “What potential opportunities and obstacles do you experience in your job?” or “What support do you have?” The group interviewquestions delved deeper into the survey questions, such as: “What are the conditions for leading the culture school?”, “How much control can the culture school tolerate?” and “What is the most important future issue?”Interview data has not yet been analyzed, while survey data has been partially analyzed. Through a discursively oriented analysis (Wetherell & Potter, 1992) guided by the concepts of interpretive repertoires and Billig's (1988, 2005) ideological dilemmas, culture school leaders´ discursive constructions of the mission of culture school, management practice, and future issues have been crystallized, as have the ideological dilemmas that these constructions point to.
A preliminary conclusion highlights the ideological dilemmas that emerge in the analysis. One such dilemma can be formulated as ‘culture school in a field of tension between civic education versus education with predetermined goals.’ Another dilemma can be described as ‘culture school in a field of tension between art and cultural education versus social meeting place’, and yet another as ‘culture school in a field of tension between locally free versus nationally conditional’.
These dilemmas might, reversed, also have something to say about what Swedish culture school is perceived as, why it exists, and what lies ahead from the perspective of culture school leaders.
The relevance for Nordic educational research is considered high because the Swedish culture school is a special form of school with more or less similar examples in the other Nordic countries. While the importance of culture school leaders for how the heritage of the culture school should be translated into practical activities is emphasized (Lindgren & Söderman, 2024), there is a lack of comprehensive research on that topic. For that reason, empirical research is of importance.
Keywords
Swedish culture school, leadership, pedagogy, survey
National Category
Educational Sciences
Research subject
Educational Work
Identifiers
urn:nbn:se:kau:diva-108532 (URN)
Conference
NERA
2026-02-042026-02-042026-02-12Bibliographically approved