Change search
Link to record
Permanent link

Direct link
Alternative names
Publications (10 of 286) Show all publications
Eriksson, A., Gericke, N. & Olsson, D. (2026). How can students learn about photosynthesis?: The outcomes of a teaching design based on the Photosynthesis Literacy Framework. Journal of Biological Education
Open this publication in new window or tab >>How can students learn about photosynthesis?: The outcomes of a teaching design based on the Photosynthesis Literacy Framework
2026 (English)In: Journal of Biological Education, ISSN 0021-9266, E-ISSN 2157-6009Article in journal (Refereed) Epub ahead of print
Abstract [en]

Photosynthesis education is often perceived as abstract and challenging. The Photosynthesis Literacy Framework was developed with the dual aim of mitigating students' learning difficulties, and increasing the topic's relevance by framing photosynthesis within societal and sustainability issues. This article presents an effect study in which a teaching design based on the framework was implemented and assessed compared with a control group that was taught in the traditional way. A mixed-method design was used, involving quantitative pre- and post-tests for both groups, and qualitative classroom observations and student interviews for the intervention (experimental) group. A thematic analysis was applied to the qualitative data to identify possible pedagogical features of the teaching design that supported students' development of photosynthesis literacy. The teaching design was found to be effective, with the experimental group showing significant improvements in photosynthesis literacy in most of its dimensions compared with the control group, especially regarding scientific understanding. Four key features of the teaching design that supported its effectiveness were: authentic experiences; active participation; wonder and fascination; and collaborative work. The teaching design is recommended for use in various contexts, to provide effective and meaningful learning in photosynthesis education.

Place, publisher, year, edition, pages
Taylor & Francis, 2026
Keywords
Photosynthesis education, secondary school, sustainability, scientific literacy, student-centred education, effect study
National Category
Didactics
Research subject
Biology
Identifiers
urn:nbn:se:kau:diva-108228 (URN)10.1080/00219266.2025.2605042 (DOI)001654245100001 ()2-s2.0-105026674959 (Scopus ID)
Note

Artikeln tidigare publicerad som manuskript i Anderssons (2025) doktorsavhandling med titeln Kraftfull kunskap om fotosyntes transformerad till undervisningsinnehåll via ett ramverk för fotosynteslitteracitet.

Available from: 2026-01-19 Created: 2026-01-19 Last updated: 2026-01-19Bibliographically approved
Rönner, A.-C., Jakobsson, A. & Gericke, N. (2025). A comparative study of how infectious diseases are portrayed in Swedish biology textbooks before and after the COVID–19 pandemic. In: : . Paper presented at The 16th conference of the european science education research association, Copenhagen, Denmark, August 25-29, 2025..
Open this publication in new window or tab >>A comparative study of how infectious diseases are portrayed in Swedish biology textbooks before and after the COVID–19 pandemic
2025 (English)Conference paper, Oral presentation with published abstract (Other academic)
Abstract [en]

The COVID–19 pandemic had an immense impact on societies globally, emphasising the pivotal importance of understanding infectious diseases. This study was conducted to delineate the possible influence of the pandemic, by comparing how infectious diseases are portrayed in biology textbooks (school years 4–6 and 7–9) published before and after the COVID–19 pandemic outbreak. Data was subjected to content and thematic analysis, employing contagion literacy as an analytical framework. The contagion literacy framework identifies six content themes important to teach: contagions, transmission routes, hygiene, vaccinations, antibiotics and antibiotic resistance and sexually transmitted diseases that can be divided into three health literacy levels; functional, which focuses on factual knowledge, interactive, an invitation to what one should do and critical, which requires a higher awareness with critical reflection. The main conclusion from the comparative analysis was that very few changes were made in the textbooks as a consequence of the pandemic and an overall dominance of functional health literacy. However, critical health literacy descriptions of vaccinations increased in the aftermath of COVID–19 in lower secondary textbooks (7–9), while simultaneously content descriptions about antibiotic and antibiotic resistance were reduced. Critical health literacy aspects of vaccination were included in biology textbooks published only after the pandemic. Concomitantly, the inclusion of descriptions of linkage between contagions and infectious diseases and incubation periods was also found in textbooks published after the pandemic. Implications for curriculum development and the impact on teaching and learning are discussed. 

Keywords
Science Education, Science Textbooks, Teaching Materials
National Category
Didactics Public Health, Global Health and Social Medicine
Research subject
Biology; Biology
Identifiers
urn:nbn:se:kau:diva-106712 (URN)
Conference
The 16th conference of the european science education research association, Copenhagen, Denmark, August 25-29, 2025.
Available from: 2025-08-29 Created: 2025-08-29 Last updated: 2025-10-16Bibliographically approved
Gericke, N., Tani, S., Newall, E. & Deng, Z. (2025). A framework for curricular analysis of powerful knowledge: comparing school biology in England, Finland and Sweden. Journal of Curriculum Studies, 57(4), 441-465
Open this publication in new window or tab >>A framework for curricular analysis of powerful knowledge: comparing school biology in England, Finland and Sweden
2025 (English)In: Journal of Curriculum Studies, ISSN 0022-0272, E-ISSN 1366-5839, Vol. 57, no 4, p. 441-465Article in journal (Refereed) Published
Abstract [en]

This study investigates and compares knowledge types in national curricula embedded in the curriculum tradition (England) and the didactic tradition (Finland and Sweden). In the study, we develop and operationalize a theoretical framework based on educational purposes (academic, citizenship and humanistic purposes) and knowledge categories (substantive, disciplinary, sociocultural applications, pedagogical considerations and student-psychological considerations). The framework is thus embedded in a didactical perspective on powerful knowledge and is used as an analytical lens in a quantitative content analysis, and a consecutive qualitative analysis providing 'thick' descriptions of the biology curricula for each country providing a contextual interpretation of the results. From the analysis, we can conclude that the curricula are different and identify different aspects of knowledge. The English curriculum mainly identifies the products and processes of biology to teach. The Finnish curriculum has a holistic approach connecting the products and processes of biology, with the teaching and learning process and how students should apply the knowledge in society. The Swedish curriculum could be described as a hybrid of the English and Finnish ones focusing on the products and processes of biology and how this knowledge can be applied in society. Implications for teaching and learning are discussed.

Place, publisher, year, edition, pages
Routledge, 2025
Keywords
Curriculum analysis, curricular framework, powerful knowledge, transformation of knowledge, secondary education
National Category
Didactics
Research subject
Biology; Subject-specific education
Identifiers
urn:nbn:se:kau:diva-105869 (URN)10.1080/00220272.2025.2512323 (DOI)001501362800001 ()2-s2.0-105007441290 (Scopus ID)
Funder
Swedish Research Council, VR-2018-03603
Available from: 2025-06-26 Created: 2025-06-26 Last updated: 2025-10-16Bibliographically approved
Sass, W., Boeve-de Pauw, J. N. .., Olsson, D., Rieckmann, M. & Gericke, N. (2025). A quality education for sustainability teaching (QUEST) framework: Advancing action competence in sustainability education. The Journal of Environmental Education, 1-18
Open this publication in new window or tab >>A quality education for sustainability teaching (QUEST) framework: Advancing action competence in sustainability education
Show others...
2025 (English)In: The Journal of Environmental Education, ISSN 0095-8964, E-ISSN 1940-1892, p. 1-18Article in journal (Refereed) Epub ahead of print
Abstract [en]

The Anthropocene, characterized by human behavior acting as a formidable force of nature, casts the question what it means to be human in new light. Consequently, discussions on quality education need revisiting. Drawing from the literature on quality education for sustainability (EfS) and decolonization of education, we investigate consequences for teaching and learning. We then zoom in on teaching approaches aimed at equipping current and future generations with what they need to contribute to a sustainable world in an equitable manner that embraces perspectives from both the Global North and South. Although much has been written about EfS, a comprehensive teaching framework is lacking to date. With the development of the Quality Education for Sustainability Teaching (QUEST) Framework, we initiate the quest for answers to what quality education should entail in the Anthropocene. 

Place, publisher, year, edition, pages
Routledge, 2025
Keywords
action competence, Critical, education for sustainability, educational theory, postcolonial
National Category
Didactics
Research subject
Biology; Subject-specific education
Identifiers
urn:nbn:se:kau:diva-106827 (URN)10.1080/00958964.2025.2542937 (DOI)001565079200001 ()2-s2.0-105014592462 (Scopus ID)
Available from: 2025-09-08 Created: 2025-09-08 Last updated: 2025-10-16Bibliographically approved
Olsson, D., Berglund, T., Boeve-de Pauw, J., Gericke, N. & Olsson, D. (2025). A systematic review of self-assessment scales on action competence in environmental and sustainability education: current limitations and development opportunities. Environmental Education Research
Open this publication in new window or tab >>A systematic review of self-assessment scales on action competence in environmental and sustainability education: current limitations and development opportunities
Show others...
2025 (English)In: Environmental Education Research, ISSN 1350-4622, E-ISSN 1469-5871Article in journal (Refereed) Epub ahead of print
Abstract [en]

Environmental and Sustainability Education (ESE) has the potential to empower learners to become agents of democratic transformation toward sustainability. Part of this lies in ESE's potential to foster action competence (AC) among learners. To capture this potential, ESE should be informed by feedback from adequate assessment instruments. The most common type is self-assessment scales, enabling large-scale statistical analyses. Drawing on theories of social change and democracy, we argue that self-assessment scales should: (a) be grounded in, and capable of assessing, AC for both individually driven and systemically oriented actions for social change; (b) distinguish between individual and collective AC; and (c) be based on a solid theoretical foundation regarding what supports and hinders actions for social change. Through a systematic review we identify validated scales assessing AC for sustainability and environmentally friendly actions, pinpoint gaps in terms of the a, b, and c listed above, and discuss ways to reduce these gaps through avenues for further instrument development and research.

Place, publisher, year, edition, pages
Taylor & Francis, 2025
Keywords
Environmental education, education for sustainable development, assessment instruments, learning outcomes, citizenship education
National Category
Didactics Pedagogy
Research subject
Political Science; Biology
Identifiers
urn:nbn:se:kau:diva-108071 (URN)10.1080/13504622.2025.2605222 (DOI)001642917800001 ()2-s2.0-105025547381 (Scopus ID)
Available from: 2026-01-08 Created: 2026-01-08 Last updated: 2026-01-13Bibliographically approved
Eriksson, S., Gericke, N. & Thörne, K. (2025). Analogy competence for science teachers. Studies in science education
Open this publication in new window or tab >>Analogy competence for science teachers
2025 (English)In: Studies in science education, ISSN 0305-7267, E-ISSN 1940-8412Article in journal (Refereed) Epub ahead of print
Abstract [en]

Analogies are common explanatory tools in science teaching and have long been appreciated for their function to facilitate students' learning of abstract scientific concepts, to stimulate engagement and motivation and to let students practice scientific language. At the same time, there is a risk that analogies may cause misconceptions. Therefore, teachers must have competence in how to use analogies in science teaching. Based on the question 'What do science teachers need to know, consider and master for fruitful teaching with analogies' we reviewed the research literature about teaching science with analogies. Applying a systematic integrative review approach, we identified key aspects of teaching with analogies that, based on a competence model, were constructed into the new Analogy Competence for Science Teachers (ACT) framework. The framework is aimed to guide and support teachers in planning and performing fruitful science teaching with analogies. Compared to previous teaching models, the ACT framework to a greater extent accentuates factors related to teachers' expertise and knowledge about the educational functions of analogies relating to the planning, selection, and instruction aspects of the teaching process, in addition to the conceptual considerations of analogies. The ACT framework has implications for science education and science education research.

Place, publisher, year, edition, pages
Routledge, 2025
Keywords
teaching with analogies, analogical reasoning, teaching strategies, analogy teaching model, science teaching
National Category
Didactics
Research subject
Biology
Identifiers
urn:nbn:se:kau:diva-102510 (URN)10.1080/03057267.2024.2434797 (DOI)001371236700001 ()2-s2.0-85210984534 (Scopus ID)
Funder
Swedish Research Council, 2017-06038
Available from: 2024-12-19 Created: 2024-12-19 Last updated: 2025-10-31Bibliographically approved
Rydin, M., Gericke, N., Christenson, N. & Haglund, J. (2025). Areas of tension in teaching climate change–conflicts between Swedish preservice science teachers’ beliefs. International Journal of Science Education
Open this publication in new window or tab >>Areas of tension in teaching climate change–conflicts between Swedish preservice science teachers’ beliefs
2025 (English)In: International Journal of Science Education, ISSN 0950-0693, E-ISSN 1464-5289Article in journal (Refereed) Epub ahead of print
Abstract [en]

Introducing climate change education into the science curricula and the classroom requires science teacher education to prepare preservice science teachers to navigate political, ethical, and emotional dimensions. This study investigates Swedish preservice science teachers’ beliefs about teaching climate change, revealing tensions between traditional science teaching and climate change education. Using semi-structured interviews with six preservice science teachers from a Swedish university, we identified beliefs about teaching approaches, content, students, self, teaching strategies, and context relating to teaching climate change. Three tensions emerged between the preservice teachers’ held beliefs: (1) dealing with values in balancing teacher neutrality and passion for the topic, (2) dealing with emotions in giving students an understanding of the severity of climate change while managing negative impacts on students’ emotional wellbeing, and (3) aligning a view of climate change as an anthropocentric issue and a traditional focus on scientific concepts in science education. These findings indicate the need to develop science teacher education to address these tensions, as introducing climate change education into the science curricula requires navigating political, ethical, and emotional dimensions, diverging from traditional science teaching focused on facts and concepts. Finally, we offer recommendations for teacher education programmes. 

Place, publisher, year, edition, pages
Routledge, 2025
Keywords
Climate change education, preservice science teachers, teacher beliefs
National Category
Didactics
Research subject
Educational Work; Biology
Identifiers
urn:nbn:se:kau:diva-103479 (URN)10.1080/09500693.2025.2466771 (DOI)001426645300001 ()2-s2.0-85218261400 (Scopus ID)
Funder
Swedish Research Council, IBL-2020-00055, IBL-2020-00112
Available from: 2025-03-04 Created: 2025-03-04 Last updated: 2025-10-16Bibliographically approved
Christenson, N., Haglund, J. & Gericke, N. (2025). Balancing risk perception and climate literacy: Education for climate action. In: : . Paper presented at NoFa X: The 10th Nordic Conference on subject didactics.
Open this publication in new window or tab >>Balancing risk perception and climate literacy: Education for climate action
2025 (English)Conference paper, Oral presentation with published abstract (Refereed)
Abstract [en]

Climate change is the most significant global challenge of our time, with widespread impacts on the environment, economy, public health, and social stability (IPCC, 2023). Recognizing this, the USGCRP (2009) highlights the importance of prioritizing climate literacy in education—a multifaceted concept that extends beyond factual knowledge to include scientific skills, personal attitudes, and values that empower individuals to address climate-related issues and adopt climate-conscious behaviors (Dupigny-Giroux, 2010).This presentation reports from an international research project exploring the role of climate education and risk perception in fostering climate-friendly intentions to act. Empirical findings from a large-scale survey of the public (N= 2000) and upper secondary students (N= 582) indicate that incorporating global risk perception significantly improves predictive models of climate-friendly intentions to act. Thus, risk perception plays a crucial role in shaping climate-friendly behavior, with global risk perception having a stronger impact than personal, local, risk perception. However, in depth interviews with young people (N=15) already engaged in climate action suggest that excessive risk perception can lead to anxiety and disengagement, underscoring the need for balanced educational approaches. Furthermore, an action research study, conducted in collaboration with researchers and science and social science teachers at three lower secondary schools, focused on integrating interdisciplinary teaching of climate change with an emphasis on local flooding risks. Findings revealed tensions between pedagogical priorities. Science teachers often emphasize climate change as a physical phenomenon, whereas social science teachers highlight emotional engagement and behavioral motivation. While students generally appreciate climate-focused learning experiences and express climate-friendly aspirations, their emotional engagement and corresponding actions often remain limited. In conclusion, the project’s findings emphasize the need for interdisciplinary and balanced educational approaches that enhance climate literacy while ensuring that young people are both motivated and equipped to take meaningful climate action.

Keywords
Climate Literace, Risk Perception, Science Education
National Category
Educational Sciences
Research subject
Biology; Physics
Identifiers
urn:nbn:se:kau:diva-104525 (URN)
Conference
NoFa X: The 10th Nordic Conference on subject didactics
Projects
riCCS
Funder
Swedish Research Council, 2019-03603
Available from: 2025-05-26 Created: 2025-05-26 Last updated: 2025-10-16Bibliographically approved
Gericke, N. (2025). Education for Sustainable Development in Subject-Specific Education and the Contribution of Language Teaching. In: Minna Maijala; Salla-Riikka Kuusalu; Riikka Ullakonoja (Ed.), Transformative Language Teaching for Sustainability: From Theory to Practice (pp. 27-51). Palgrave Macmillan
Open this publication in new window or tab >>Education for Sustainable Development in Subject-Specific Education and the Contribution of Language Teaching
2025 (English)In: Transformative Language Teaching for Sustainability: From Theory to Practice / [ed] Minna Maijala; Salla-Riikka Kuusalu; Riikka Ullakonoja, Palgrave Macmillan, 2025, p. 27-51Chapter in book (Other academic)
Abstract [en]

Sustainability education, or Education for Sustainable Development (ESD) as it is often referred to in policy discussions, is an educational approach based on the idea that education should contribute to a sustainable world. Whereas conventional scholastic education typically emphasises the learning of content in the form of predefined knowledge or skills, ESD aims to encourage students to act in more sustainable ways. This shift of aim raises a question: should ESD be addressed primarily within general or subject-specific education? It is most commonly addressed in general education because of the competence-based approach of ESD, and it is this issue that forms the subject of this chapter. Based on Biesta’s suggestions about the main purposes of education and Young’s work on the idea of powerful knowledge and possible curriculum trajectories for the future, this chapter argues that there is a need to adopt a multidisciplinary perspective in ESD that relies on contributions from multiple subject-specific teaching traditions. Moreover, findings from empirical studies are used to show how a transformative language education strategy can play a major role in empowering students’ action competence for sustainability. 

Place, publisher, year, edition, pages
Palgrave Macmillan, 2025
Keywords
Action competence, Competence turn, Education for Sustainable Development, Language teaching, Powerful knowledge, Subject didactics, Curricula, E-learning, Education computing, Students, Sustainable development, Or educations, Policy discussion, Subject didactic, Subject-specific, Sustainability education, Teaching
National Category
Didactics Pedagogy
Research subject
Biology
Identifiers
urn:nbn:se:kau:diva-108048 (URN)10.1007/978-3-031-85493-4_2 (DOI)2-s2.0-105023615151 (Scopus ID)978-3-031-85493-4 (ISBN)978-3-031-85492-7 (ISBN)978-3-031-85495-8 (ISBN)
Available from: 2026-01-08 Created: 2026-01-08 Last updated: 2026-01-08Bibliographically approved
Lampert, P., Pany, P. & Gericke, N. (2025). Hands-on learning with 3D-printed flower models. Journal of Biological Education, 59(1), 181-191
Open this publication in new window or tab >>Hands-on learning with 3D-printed flower models
2025 (English)In: Journal of Biological Education, ISSN 0021-9266, E-ISSN 2157-6009, Vol. 59, no 1, p. 181-191Article in journal (Refereed) Published
Abstract [en]

Sustaining a broad diversity of plants is key for a sustainable future. For instance, providing a variety of flowering plants in urban and agricultural landscapes mitigates the current decline of pollinators and biodiversity in general. Therefore, educating about the diversity of flowering plants has high current relevance for biology and environmental education. Unfortunately, students have little knowledge about plant diversity and find botanical topics often uninteresting. Therefore, this paper presents and discusses an engaging teaching approach, where students engage in a role-play with 3D-printed flower models to learn how the morphology of plants affects different insect pollinator groups. To gain insights into students’ experiences with the flower models, guided interviews were conducted one week after this role-play. The interview results show that the students were not only motivated to engage in the role-play, but also gained content knowledge on how the diversity of flowers affects insect pollinators. Hence, the approach highlights how 3D printing can contribute to design teaching approaches that engage students in hands-on activities in order to foster their understanding of flower diversity. 

Place, publisher, year, edition, pages
Routledge, 2025
Keywords
Plant blindness, flower models, 3D printing, biodiversity, teaching approach
National Category
Ecology
Research subject
Biology
Identifiers
urn:nbn:se:kau:diva-97915 (URN)10.1080/00219266.2023.2282427 (DOI)001124953400001 ()2-s2.0-85179912781 (Scopus ID)
Funder
EU, Horizon 2020, 101031566
Available from: 2024-01-04 Created: 2024-01-04 Last updated: 2025-10-16Bibliographically approved
Organisations
Identifiers
ORCID iD: ORCID iD iconorcid.org/0000-0001-8735-2102

Search in DiVA

Show all publications