Against the background of the increased importance of multimodal expressions in today's textual landscape and the importance of young people's reading skills in the encounter with argumentative texts on the internet, the aim of this thesis is to increase knowledge about lower secondary students' critical reading of digital multimodal argumentative texts in L1, such as digitally published opinion pieces, Youtube videos, and websites.
Drawing on multimodal social semiotics combined with critical literacy, the following research questions were studied: How do students read and make meaning of digital multimodal argumentative texts? How does students’ agency emerge through their descriptions of reading digital multimodal argumentative texts? What educational implications for teaching about reading multimodal argumentative texts can be discerned?
12 lessons in three classes (students aged 14-15) in Sweden have been filmed using three video cameras, in which the students make meaning of texts individually, in pairs, and in groups of four. 12 interviews with students in pairs have been conducted using video recordings as stimulated recall. Intertextual content analysis was used to examine the transcripts of the video recordings with an expansion to include aspects of visual grammar. Reflexive thematic analysis was used to analyse the recorded and transcribed interviews.
Findings indicate students’ awareness of ulterior motives in the texts, yet relying on professional-looking texts or senders who appear authoritative. Lacking knowledge of argumentative text analysis, the students invent strategies when examining the texts. The students show agency in their reading process when finding their individual reading paths and making use of previous knowledge. Multimodal affordances are primarily used when reading texts dominated by other modalities than verbal text. Consequently, reading education needs to deal with reading and analysing argumentative as well as multimodal texts.