The critical situation for European eel population was addressed in 2007 by a new Council Regulation (No 1100⁄2007⁄EC), which required all member states to develop national eel management plans. The goal of each of these national eel management plans is to allow with high probability the escapement of the silver eel to the sea is at least 40% of the best estimate of escapement biomass that would have existed if no anthropogenic influences had impacted the stock. The four main actions of the Swedish eel management plan are: 1) reduction of the fishery, 2) improved possibilities for downstream migration (reduced turbine mortality), 3) stocking of glass eel and 4) increased control measures.”Krafttag ål” was initiated in 2010 to contribute to reduced turbine mortality with the goal of allowing at least 40% of downstream migrating eels in rivers with hydropower dams to reach the sea. This letter of intent was signed by the Swedish hydropower industry and the Swedish Agency for Marine and Water Management. The reduced turbine mortality shall be achieved by implementing measures where they are expected to give the largest effect (“most bang for the buck”). The Swedish rivers have been ranked in a priority list, with the following eleven rivers listed as “top priority rivers”: 1) Göta älv, 2) Motala ström, 3) Rönne å, 4) Lagan, 5) Norrström, 6) Mörrumsån, 7) Nyköpingsån, 8) Kävlingeån, 9) Örekilsälven, 10) Dalälven and 11) Skräbeån. These 11 rivers are believed to have the greatest potential for increasing survival of eels after rehabilitative measures have been implemented.According to the Swedish eel management plan, the silver eel mortality at all hydroelectric plants in the top priority rivers has been set to 70%. It is unclear how realistic the assumed passage mortality of 70% is, and thus the aim of this study is to obtain information about the passage conditions in the top priority rivers by: 1) collecting information about studies carried out in the top priority rivers, 2) estimating turbine-induced mortality in the top priority rivers using a newly developed model, and 3) identifying what is known and not known about eel downstream passage conditions in the top priority rivers and proposing future activities within this context.Estimates of silver eel escapement to the sea, based on a constant 70% turbine induced mortality (old estimate), generally differed from model estimates using empirical data (new estimate). In most cases the new estimate is higher than the old, i.e. more eels are expected to reach the sea, but in some cases the combined mortality is even higher than the assumed mortality of 70% per plant. In addition, eel production is not known for most rivers, which means that even with accurate estimates of passage survival will not help us in estimating total escapement to the sea. It is not even known if eels are still present in some of the rivers, and thus we recommend further investigations be conducted in these rivers. For the small rivers, such as Rönne å, Kävlingeån, Örekilsälven, Nyköpingsån, Skräbeån and Borgvikeälven, proven methods to improve passage or collect eels are available for implementation. In large rivers like Göta älv, Motala ström and Norrström, it is more difficult, but technically possible. We recommend that rehabilitative measures be implemented and tested in one or several of these large rivers.
To reach the goals of Krafttag ål, more effort needs to be put into identifying the current situation and the current eel production in the top priority rivers. After identifying the most productive areas, actions are needed to ensure a sustainable eel production by enabling juvenile eels to reach these rearing areas. The next step will be to implement measures to allow silver eels to migrate from freshwater rearing areas to the sea. The current knowledge is rather good on such rehabilitative measures in small to medium sized rivers, whereas there is an urgent need to gain more knowledge about measures passing or collecting silver eels at plants in large rivers.