Change search
ReferencesLink to record
Permanent link

Direct link
Importance of investment decisions and rehabilitation approaches in an ageing wastewater pipeline network.: A case study of Oslo (Norway)
Bologna university, Italy.
Norwegian University of Science and Technology, Trondheim, Noraway. (Miljö och Energi)ORCID iD: 0000-0002-6293-8657
Norwegian University of Science and Technology, Trondheim, Norway.
SINTEF, Trondheim, Norway.
2008 (English)In: Water Science and Technology, ISSN 0273-1223, E-ISSN 1996-9732, Vol. 58, no 12, 2279-2293 p.Article in journal (Refereed) Published
Abstract [en]

As Oslo Vann og Avlopsetaten (VAV, meaning Water and Sewage Department) looks into the future, it is faced with a quandary-to replace old pipelines or to continue maintaining them. The primary goal is to improve the level of service. The secondary goals are to rejuvenate the system and stem the decline in capital value. In 1991-2006, the Operation and Maintenance expenses (O&M) were far higher than the investments, and the network aged as its capital value plummeted. However, if the funds are insufficient, the self-financing Oslo VAV would have to turn to the consumers for help. Will the consumers pay more to have a 'younger' system? What if they are happy with the 'status quo' and are unconcerned about the falling capital value? Should the pipelines be depreciated over a longer period than the 40 years which is adopted now? Should the economic method be replaced by a more engineering-based method, whereby the pipes are assessed 'on merit'-on the basis of their service lives? There are numerous issues and a good decision will ease the road ahead. This paper, using Life Cycle Costing Analysis (LCCA) and scenarios therein, looks at how Oslo VAV could strike a balance between expending on O&M, investing in upgrading the network, and decelerating the ageing of the network while augmenting the capital value, and what is the best attainable set of targets they could aim for, at the end of the next 20 years. The two approaches mentioned above are compared with each other. It is seen that a rehabilitation programme based on the pipes performance approach is preferable to one guided by an economic lifetime approach, when the motive is to optimise expenditure and also improve the level of service.

Place, publisher, year, edition, pages
London: IWA Publishing, 2008. Vol. 58, no 12, 2279-2293 p.
Keyword [en]
asset management; depreciation; long term planning; Oslo; service life; wastewater pipelines
National Category
Infrastructure Engineering Water Engineering
Research subject
Environmental and Energy Systems
URN: urn:nbn:se:kau:diva-45592DOI: 10.2166/wst.2008.559ISI: 000261930500002OAI: diva2:956831
Available from: 2016-08-31 Created: 2016-08-31 Last updated: 2016-09-20Bibliographically approved

Open Access in DiVA

No full text

Other links

Publisher's full text

Search in DiVA

By author/editor
Govindarajan, Venkatesh
In the same journal
Water Science and Technology
Infrastructure EngineeringWater Engineering

Search outside of DiVA

GoogleGoogle Scholar

Altmetric score

Total: 4 hits
ReferencesLink to record
Permanent link

Direct link