Change search
CiteExportLink to record
Permanent link

Direct link
Cite
Citation style
  • apa
  • ieee
  • modern-language-association-8th-edition
  • vancouver
  • apa.csl
  • Other style
More styles
Language
  • de-DE
  • en-GB
  • en-US
  • fi-FI
  • nn-NO
  • nn-NB
  • sv-SE
  • Other locale
More languages
Output format
  • html
  • text
  • asciidoc
  • rtf
Validation of a test measuring young learners’ general L2 English vocabulary knowledge
Karlstad University, Faculty of Arts and Social Sciences (starting 2013), Center for Language and Literature in Education (from 2013). Karlstad University, Faculty of Arts and Social Sciences (starting 2013), Department of Language, Literature and Intercultural Studies (from 2013). (Centrum för språk- och litteraturdidaktik (CSL))ORCID iD: 0000-0003-0511-4624
2016 (English)In: Novitas-ROYAL, E-ISSN 1307-4733, Vol. 10, no 1, p. 1-23Article in journal (Refereed) Published
Abstract [en]

This study aims to present the validation of a test designed to assess young learners’ general L2 English vocabulary knowledge, the Young Learner Vocabulary Assessment Test (YLVAT). YLVAT consists of 37 items selected from the K1–2 frequency levels of the Productive and Vocabulary Levels Tests. In the study, Swedish learners (N = 52, age 12) took YLVAT and filled out an evaluation; scores from the national test of English (readingand listening comprehension) were also collected. Four validity measurements were used: the spread of YLVAT scores, correlation with the national test – reading, correlation with the national test – listening, and evaluation responses. YLVAT results point to a sufficient spread of scores (M = 18.9, SD = 6.5). There were significant correlations between YLVAT and (i) reading (r = .597**), (ii) listening (r = .541**), (iii) perceived test difficulty (rs = -.538**), and (iv) how fun it was to take the test (rs = .683**). An ANOVA showed that learners who found YLVAT “easy” or “very easy” scored significantly (p = .000) higher (26.1) than those who found it “difficult” (18.3) or “very difficult” (12.9). Finally, teachers found YLVAT to correlate with their own assessment of learners’vocabulary.

Place, publisher, year, edition, pages
2016. Vol. 10, no 1, p. 1-23
Keywords [en]
ESL, EFL, testing, test, vocabulary knowledge, formative assessment, L2 English, young learners, assessment, vocabulary test
National Category
Specific Languages
Research subject
English
Identifiers
URN: urn:nbn:se:kau:diva-41982OAI: oai:DiVA.org:kau-41982DiVA, id: diva2:926578
Available from: 2016-05-09 Created: 2016-05-09 Last updated: 2023-02-23Bibliographically approved

Open Access in DiVA

No full text in DiVA

Other links

pdf

Authority records

Sundqvist, Pia

Search in DiVA

By author/editor
Sundqvist, Pia
By organisation
Center for Language and Literature in Education (from 2013)Department of Language, Literature and Intercultural Studies (from 2013)
In the same journal
Novitas-ROYAL
Specific Languages

Search outside of DiVA

GoogleGoogle Scholar

urn-nbn

Altmetric score

urn-nbn
Total: 205 hits
CiteExportLink to record
Permanent link

Direct link
Cite
Citation style
  • apa
  • ieee
  • modern-language-association-8th-edition
  • vancouver
  • apa.csl
  • Other style
More styles
Language
  • de-DE
  • en-GB
  • en-US
  • fi-FI
  • nn-NO
  • nn-NB
  • sv-SE
  • Other locale
More languages
Output format
  • html
  • text
  • asciidoc
  • rtf