Change search
ReferencesLink to record
Permanent link

Direct link
Touch forbidden, consumption allowed: Counter-intuitive effects of touch restrictions on customers' purchase behavior
Karlstad University, Faculty of Arts and Social Sciences (starting 2013), Department of Social and Psychological Studies. Karlstad University, Faculty of Arts and Social Sciences (starting 2013), Service Research Center.
2016 (English)In: Food Quality and Preference, ISSN 0950-3293, E-ISSN 1873-6343, Vol. 50, 1-6 p.Article in journal (Refereed) PublishedText
Abstract [en]

In-store events are increasingly used to provide customers with unique shopping experiences. Although recent studies indicate that such events positively influence customers' purchase intentions and store choice decisions, little is known about how customers respond to various in-store events. This paper investigates one type of in-store event that is frequently used in several food and non-food contexts. Specifically, the study investigates how an in-store product demonstration influences customers' subsequent purchase behavior depending on whether they are restricted or encouraged to touch the products being demonstrated. An initial scenario-based experiment involving 35 undergraduates aimed to examine how people intuitively think that restricting (versus encouraging) touch during an in-store product demonstration would influence their subsequent purchase behavior. A two-way ANOVA with participant gender and experimental condition as the between-subjects factors consistently showed that people hold a lay theory that restricting touch should have a negative impact on the amount of money they spend and the number of products they purchase. A second field experiment involving 126 customers in a retail store aimed to investigate whether this lay belief is consistent with customers' actual purchase behavior. Counter-intuitively, a two-way ANOVA with customer gender and experimental condition (touch restriction, touch encouragement) as the between-subjects factors revealed that restricting touch during an in-store product demonstration resulted in significantly more money being spent, a larger number of products being purchased, and more expensive products being purchased. These findings show that consumer lay theory can directly contradict customers' actual purchase behavior. (C) 2015 Elsevier Ltd. All rights reserved.

Place, publisher, year, edition, pages
Elsevier, 2016. Vol. 50, 1-6 p.
Keyword [en]
Reactance, Compensatory consumption, Threat to freedom, Product touch, Touch restriction, Product demonstration
National Category
Research subject
URN: urn:nbn:se:kau:diva-41974DOI: 10.1016/j.foodqual.2015.12.011ISI: 000372767300001OAI: diva2:926234
Available from: 2016-05-04 Created: 2016-05-04 Last updated: 2017-01-16Bibliographically approved
In thesis
The record could not be found. The reason may be that the record is no longer available or you may have typed in a wrong id in the address field.

Open Access in DiVA

The full text will be freely available from 2017-06-11 08:00
Available from 2017-06-11 08:00

Other links

Publisher's full text

Search in DiVA

By author/editor
Otterbring, Tobias
By organisation
Department of Social and Psychological StudiesService Research Center
In the same journal
Food Quality and Preference

Search outside of DiVA

GoogleGoogle Scholar

Altmetric score

Total: 6 hits
ReferencesLink to record
Permanent link

Direct link