Change search
CiteExportLink to record
Permanent link

Direct link
Cite
Citation style
  • apa
  • ieee
  • modern-language-association-8th-edition
  • vancouver
  • apa.csl
  • Other style
More styles
Language
  • de-DE
  • en-GB
  • en-US
  • fi-FI
  • nn-NO
  • nn-NB
  • sv-SE
  • Other locale
More languages
Output format
  • html
  • text
  • asciidoc
  • rtf
Restorative removal of plant litter and vegetation 40 years after abandonment enhances re-emergence of steppe grassland vegetation
Romania.
Romania.
Justus-Liebig-University Giessen, Germany.ORCID iD: 0000-0002-6953-3855
Justus-Liebig-University Giessen, Germany.
2010 (English)In: Biological Conservation, ISSN 0006-3207, E-ISSN 1873-2917, Vol. 143, no 2, p. 449-456Article in journal (Refereed) Published
Abstract [en]

The accumulation of biomass and of dead plant remains is a direct consequence of grassland abandonment. Litter can occupy potential microsites for seed germination and seedling establishment, and thus decrease species diversity in the long-term. This effect can be more accentuated in dry grassland of open structure where species are adapted to excessive light and bare surfaces during the recruitment phase. We conducted a field experiment with litter removal alone or in combination with vegetation cutting and studied germination and seedling survival during 2 years in two abandoned steppe sites. With our experimental treatments we intended to create microsites and to activate the seed bank, with the aim to enhance recruitment of dry-grassland species; potentially also those already absent from the established vegetation. Our results show, that while both treatments significantly increased recruitment by enhancing seed germination in the first year of the study, only litter removal combined with vegetation cutting significantly promoted seedling survival during both years. Our experiment demonstrated that even after 40 years of abandonment the applied measures favoured the re-emergence of target species that were very rare or absent from the above-ground vegetation of continental steppe-like grassland. Thus, management prescriptions which comprise removal of dead and even living biomass, such as mowing or grazing, are considered beneficial for this habitat type of high nature conservation priority. (C) 2009 Elsevier Ltd. All rights reserved.

Place, publisher, year, edition, pages
2010. Vol. 143, no 2, p. 449-456
Keywords [en]
Germination, Microsite limitation, Regeneration, Seed bank, Seedling survival, Stipa grassland
National Category
Botany
Research subject
Biology
Identifiers
URN: urn:nbn:se:kau:diva-37733DOI: 10.1016/j.biocon.2009.11.012ISI: 000274761000020OAI: oai:DiVA.org:kau-37733DiVA, id: diva2:857187
Available from: 2015-09-28 Created: 2015-08-24 Last updated: 2019-07-11Bibliographically approved

Open Access in DiVA

No full text in DiVA

Other links

Publisher's full text

Authority records

Eckstein, Rolf Lutz

Search in DiVA

By author/editor
Eckstein, Rolf Lutz
In the same journal
Biological Conservation
Botany

Search outside of DiVA

GoogleGoogle Scholar

doi
urn-nbn

Altmetric score

doi
urn-nbn
Total: 261 hits
CiteExportLink to record
Permanent link

Direct link
Cite
Citation style
  • apa
  • ieee
  • modern-language-association-8th-edition
  • vancouver
  • apa.csl
  • Other style
More styles
Language
  • de-DE
  • en-GB
  • en-US
  • fi-FI
  • nn-NO
  • nn-NB
  • sv-SE
  • Other locale
More languages
Output format
  • html
  • text
  • asciidoc
  • rtf