Change search
CiteExportLink to record
Permanent link

Direct link
Cite
Citation style
  • apa
  • ieee
  • modern-language-association-8th-edition
  • vancouver
  • apa.csl
  • Other style
More styles
Language
  • de-DE
  • en-GB
  • en-US
  • fi-FI
  • nn-NO
  • nn-NB
  • sv-SE
  • Other locale
More languages
Output format
  • html
  • text
  • asciidoc
  • rtf
The Unchallenging Method is a Good One: about Measures for gender Equality and Diversity in the Swedish Rescue Service
Karlstad University, Faculty of Arts and Social Sciences (starting 2013), Department of Geography, Media and Communication. (GeRd - den genuskodade räddningstjänsten)ORCID iD: 0000-0001-8528-1099
Karlstad University, Faculty of Arts and Social Sciences (starting 2013), Department of Social and Psychological Studies. (GeRd - den genuskodade räddningstjänsten)
2013 (English)Conference paper, Oral presentation with published abstract (Refereed)
Abstract [en]

Gender equality in the Swedish Rescue Services has been a political directive since the 1990ies, but has led to few visible changes. The Swedish Rescue Service is still a male-dominated organization with a traditional focus on firefighting. The call for change is made with references to new economic realities, conceptualizations of risk, and directives for gender and ethnic equality. The overriding concern of this paper is discursive constructions of equality work in relation to political directives on increasing equal opportunities in the Swedish Rescue Services. Gender is treated as a prevailing power structure and as an integral part of organizational practices. The paper is based on a questionnaire about the practical work made on equality in the Swedish Rescue Service, answered by over 1000 persons working in the Swedish Rescue Service. The questionnaire contains a large amount of open comments, which is analyzed in this paper. The result shows that two thirds of the respondents have a mainly positive attitude towards gender equality in the Rescue Service, but that the measures for equality are considered as "wrong methods". Our analysis discusses that only methods that doesn’t challenge the present organization are considered as acceptable.

Place, publisher, year, edition, pages
2013.
National Category
Gender Studies
Research subject
Gender Studies
Identifiers
URN: urn:nbn:se:kau:diva-29460OAI: oai:DiVA.org:kau-29460DiVA, id: diva2:656099
Conference
Equality, growth and innovation - in theory and practice, Luleå University of Technology, 9-10 october 2013
Projects
GeRd - den genuskodade räddningstjänstenAvailable from: 2013-10-15 Created: 2013-10-15 Last updated: 2017-12-06Bibliographically approved

Open Access in DiVA

No full text in DiVA

Authority records

Grip, LenaJansson, Ulrika

Search in DiVA

By author/editor
Grip, LenaJansson, Ulrika
By organisation
Department of Geography, Media and CommunicationDepartment of Social and Psychological Studies
Gender Studies

Search outside of DiVA

GoogleGoogle Scholar

urn-nbn

Altmetric score

urn-nbn
Total: 620 hits
CiteExportLink to record
Permanent link

Direct link
Cite
Citation style
  • apa
  • ieee
  • modern-language-association-8th-edition
  • vancouver
  • apa.csl
  • Other style
More styles
Language
  • de-DE
  • en-GB
  • en-US
  • fi-FI
  • nn-NO
  • nn-NB
  • sv-SE
  • Other locale
More languages
Output format
  • html
  • text
  • asciidoc
  • rtf