Change search
ReferencesLink to record
Permanent link

Direct link
En integrationspolitisk paradox?: En undersökning om huruvida integrationspolitiken är en del av konstruktionen och reproduktionen av ett Vi- och Dem-tänk
Karlstad University, Faculty of Social and Life Sciences, Department of Politics and History.
2013 (Swedish)Independent thesis Basic level (degree of Bachelor), 10 credits / 15 HE creditsStudent thesis
Abstract [en]

There have been accusations made about the Swedish integration policy that it is founded on the presumptions that we, as human beings, are fundamentally different from each other depending on our birthplace and/or ethnicity. These presumptions combined with the goal that states everyone’s same rights, obligations and opportunities makes up for an integration policy paradox. Therefor the aim of this essay has been to examine whether the integration policies could be considered a part of the production as well as the reproduction of a mindset that defines us in relation to the Other. The study is based on a discourse analysis of the Swedish integration policy that has been done with the help of Carol Bacchi’s (2009) method “What’s the problem represented to be?” for analyzing problem representations of political policies. The main question that has been raised, and is being tested through this essay, is: Can the Swedish integration policy be regarded as paradoxical, in the sense that it assumes inherent differences between people? Thereafter two further questions have been used to guide the analysis: What’s the problem represented to be within the integration policy? And: What impact has identities and ethnicities had in the construction of integration policies?Using a selection of Carol Bacchi’s analytical questions an analytical framework has been made to examine the main governmental documents that provide full insight to how the integration policies is formed. With the starting-point in postcolonial theory and an ambition to have an inductive approach this study has arrived at a conclusion total opposite from what has been said in previous analysis of the integration policy. In other words, the integration policy cannot be regarded as a paradox. The main reason for this is how the priority in the policy is based on the belief that the social economical standards in one’s life are essential to how people’s lives are being played out. Furthermore the policy is focused on how to enhance the opportunities and conditions in the life of individual’s, rather than being group oriented, regardless of the ethnicity and/or foreign background.

Place, publisher, year, edition, pages
2013. , 50 p.
Series
Politiska och historiska studier
National Category
Political Science (excluding Public Administration Studies and Globalization Studies)
Identifiers
URN: urn:nbn:se:kau:diva-28627Local ID: SV:1OAI: oai:DiVA.org:kau-28627DiVA: diva2:640149
Subject / course
Political Science
Examiners
Available from: 2013-08-26 Created: 2013-08-12 Last updated: 2013-08-26Bibliographically approved

Open Access in DiVA

No full text

Search in DiVA

By author/editor
Lotrean, Alexandra
By organisation
Department of Politics and History
Political Science (excluding Public Administration Studies and Globalization Studies)

Search outside of DiVA

GoogleGoogle Scholar

Total: 353 hits
ReferencesLink to record
Permanent link

Direct link