Change search
CiteExportLink to record
Permanent link

Direct link
Cite
Citation style
  • apa
  • harvard1
  • ieee
  • modern-language-association-8th-edition
  • vancouver
  • Other style
More styles
Language
  • de-DE
  • en-GB
  • en-US
  • fi-FI
  • nn-NO
  • nn-NB
  • sv-SE
  • Other locale
More languages
Output format
  • html
  • text
  • asciidoc
  • rtf
HPLC vs UHPLC - a comparison of peak asymmetry and plan to step forward using Quality by Design (QbD) related to analytical methods
Karlstad University, Faculty of Technology and Science, Department of Chemistry and Biomedical Sciences.
Karlstad University, Faculty of Technology and Science, Department of Chemistry and Biomedical Sciences.
Astrazeneca.
2012 (English)Conference paper, (Refereed)
Abstract [en]

The purpose of this study is to demonstrate, with experiments and with computer simulations based on a firm chromatographic theory, that the wide spread perception of that the United States Pharmacopeia tailing factor must be lower than 2 (Tf < 2) is questionable when using the latest generation of LC equipment. It is shown that highly efficient LC separations like those obtained with sub-2 m porous and 2.7 m superficially porous particles (UHPLC) produce significantly higher Tf-values than the corresponding separation based on 3 m porous particles (HPLC) when the same amount of sample is injected. Still UHPLC separations provide a better resolution to adjacent peaks. Expressions have been derived that describe how the Tf-value changes with particle size or number of theoretical plates. Expressions have also been derived that can be used to scale the injection volume based on particle size or number of theoretical plates to maintain the Tf-value when translating a HPLC separation to the corresponding UHPLC separation. This aspect has been ignored in previous publications. Finally, data obtained from columns with different age/condition indicate that Tf-values should be complemented by a peak width measure to provide a more objective quality measure. A plan to take a further step for using Quality by Design (QbD) related to analytical methods will also be presented [Ref 1]. Continuous improvement of an original HPLC method to an UHPLC method will be the used as a case study. The capability of the two methods will be deeply studied using mechanistic comparisons. Method criteria that must be fulfilled for the two chromatographic methods will be stated. [1] 2012 PDA Europe Workshop Quality by Design The Role of Analytical Science in Implementing QbD − Technical and Regulatory Aspects, Liverpool UK 6-7 March. This is an industrial – academic cooperation in the Fundamental Separation S

Place, publisher, year, edition, pages
2012.
National Category
Analytical Chemistry
Identifiers
URN: urn:nbn:se:kau:diva-15261OAI: oai:DiVA.org:kau-15261DiVA: diva2:562044
Conference
21st Analysdagarna (Analytical days. Uppsala, Swden, June 11-13 2012.
Available from: 2012-10-23 Created: 2012-10-23 Last updated: 2017-01-25Bibliographically approved

Open Access in DiVA

No full text

Search in DiVA

By author/editor
Fornstedt, TorgnyForssén, Patrik
By organisation
Department of Chemistry and Biomedical Sciences
Analytical Chemistry

Search outside of DiVA

GoogleGoogle Scholar

Total: 97 hits
CiteExportLink to record
Permanent link

Direct link
Cite
Citation style
  • apa
  • harvard1
  • ieee
  • modern-language-association-8th-edition
  • vancouver
  • Other style
More styles
Language
  • de-DE
  • en-GB
  • en-US
  • fi-FI
  • nn-NO
  • nn-NB
  • sv-SE
  • Other locale
More languages
Output format
  • html
  • text
  • asciidoc
  • rtf