Change search
CiteExportLink to record
Permanent link

Direct link
Cite
Citation style
  • apa
  • harvard1
  • ieee
  • modern-language-association-8th-edition
  • vancouver
  • Other style
More styles
Language
  • de-DE
  • en-GB
  • en-US
  • fi-FI
  • nn-NO
  • nn-NB
  • sv-SE
  • Other locale
More languages
Output format
  • html
  • text
  • asciidoc
  • rtf
Energy Spells Trouble for Life Cycle Assessment
Karlstad University, Division for Engineering Sciences, Physics and Mathematics.
Karlstad University, Division for Engineering Sciences, Physics and Mathematics.
2004 (English)Manuscript (preprint) (Other academic)
Place, publisher, year, edition, pages
2004.
National Category
Energy Systems
Research subject
Environmental and Energy Systems
Identifiers
URN: urn:nbn:se:kau:diva-2515OAI: oai:DiVA.org:kau-2515DiVA: diva2:24854
Available from: 2009-06-18 Created: 2009-06-18 Last updated: 2011-11-28Bibliographically approved
In thesis
1. Technical Alternatives and Energy in LCA
Open this publication in new window or tab >>Technical Alternatives and Energy in LCA
2004 (English)Licentiate thesis, comprehensive summary (Other academic)
Abstract [en]

This licentiate thesis is based on two papers, a comparative LCA case study paper and a paper on energy issues in LCA.

A case study was done in order to investigate which of two compared technologies for chemical recovery in the pulp industry (recovery boiler, RB, or black liquor gasification, BLG) is environmentally favourable.

The chemical recovery processes by themselves are not the dominant contributors to the life cycle environmental effects. Instead, the production chains of the chemical and energy inputs to the processes dominate.

An analysis based on current LCIA environmental performance indices gives an unequivocal answer to the main question, although the strength of the answer varies between different impact assessment methods. However, the BLG process is better for the environment. If the BLG process would switch from oil to biofuel in its causticising plant, it would become clearly superior.

The energy paper analyses and elucidates some problems with the way energy is treated in LCA methodology. For most products and production processes, several quite different forms of energy are involved in different stages in the life cycle. There is no indisputable general method for comparing and aggregating these energy forms when performing an LCI, nor is there any general method for the valuation needed for the weighting in an LCIA. Some possibilities for and limitations on resolving these problems are discussed.

Series
Karlstad University Studies, ISSN 1403-8099 ; 2004:34
Identifiers
urn:nbn:se:kau:diva-2513 (URN)91-85335-02-9 (ISBN)
Presentation
(English)
Available from: 2009-05-20 Created: 2009-05-20 Last updated: 2009-05-20Bibliographically approved

Open Access in DiVA

No full text

Search in DiVA

By author/editor
Rehnström, CarinaMånsson, Bengt
By organisation
Division for Engineering Sciences, Physics and Mathematics
Energy Systems

Search outside of DiVA

GoogleGoogle Scholar

Total: 74 hits
CiteExportLink to record
Permanent link

Direct link
Cite
Citation style
  • apa
  • harvard1
  • ieee
  • modern-language-association-8th-edition
  • vancouver
  • Other style
More styles
Language
  • de-DE
  • en-GB
  • en-US
  • fi-FI
  • nn-NO
  • nn-NB
  • sv-SE
  • Other locale
More languages
Output format
  • html
  • text
  • asciidoc
  • rtf