System disruptions
We are currently experiencing disruptions on the search portals due to high traffic. We are working to resolve the issue, you may temporarily encounter an error message.
Change search
CiteExportLink to record
Permanent link

Direct link
Cite
Citation style
  • apa
  • ieee
  • modern-language-association-8th-edition
  • vancouver
  • apa.csl
  • Other style
More styles
Language
  • de-DE
  • en-GB
  • en-US
  • fi-FI
  • nn-NO
  • nn-NB
  • sv-SE
  • Other locale
More languages
Output format
  • html
  • text
  • asciidoc
  • rtf
Managing a Global Retail Brand in Different Markets: Meta-Analyses of Customer Responses to Service Encounters
Arizona State University, USA.
BI Norwegian Business School, NOR.
Central Michigan University, USA.
Karlstad University, Faculty of Arts and Social Sciences (starting 2013), Service Research Center (from 2013). Linköpings universitet.ORCID iD: 0000-0002-6589-8662
2022 (English)In: Journal of Retailing, ISSN 0022-4359, E-ISSN 1873-3271, Vol. 98, no 2, p. 294-314Article in journal (Refereed) Published
Abstract [en]

This study investigates how retailers can leverage their brand to shape customers' satisfaction with service encounters. It develops and tests hypotheses about how brand, store, and consumer factors moderate customer responses to experience clues during retail service encounters. Six meta-regression analyses synthesize and compare results from 842 satisfaction equations describing customers' encounters with a global retailer operating 400 stores in 32 countries. The results show how customers weigh their perceptions of service encounters differently depending on brand, store, and consumer factors. In markets where customers believe the retailer has high holistic brand quality, they place less weight on experience clues within the store. In markets where customers believe the retailer's service brand promise, they place more weight on in-store experience clues. In markets where the retailer promises utilitarian value, customers weigh functional experience clues more heavily. In markets with an online purchasing channel, the effect of experience clues common to offline and online store environments is magnified, and unique clues are diminished. In addition, customers heavily weigh experience clues that fit their goals. In general, retail success factors include high brand quality (which makes customers more forgiving), a service brand promise that is mirrored in the store image (which makes customers attend to the experience clues aligned with them), and the careful monitoring and managing of retail touchpoints (to customize experience clues to each market). In this way, retailers can use customer-based strategies to effectively design and manage their global retail brand in different markets. (C) 2021 New York University. Published by Elsevier Inc. All rights reserved.

Place, publisher, year, edition, pages
Elsevier, 2022. Vol. 98, no 2, p. 294-314
Keywords [en]
Brand, Experience, Global, Customer satisfaction, Service, Store image
National Category
Business Administration
Research subject
Business Administration
Identifiers
URN: urn:nbn:se:kau:diva-92401DOI: 10.1016/j.jretai.2021.03.004ISI: 000870846400009Scopus ID: 2-s2.0-85120775383OAI: oai:DiVA.org:kau-92401DiVA, id: diva2:1708501
Available from: 2022-11-04 Created: 2022-11-04 Last updated: 2022-12-09Bibliographically approved

Open Access in DiVA

No full text in DiVA

Other links

Publisher's full textScopus

Authority records

Witell, Lars

Search in DiVA

By author/editor
Witell, Lars
By organisation
Service Research Center (from 2013)
In the same journal
Journal of Retailing
Business Administration

Search outside of DiVA

GoogleGoogle Scholar

doi
urn-nbn

Altmetric score

doi
urn-nbn
Total: 166 hits
CiteExportLink to record
Permanent link

Direct link
Cite
Citation style
  • apa
  • ieee
  • modern-language-association-8th-edition
  • vancouver
  • apa.csl
  • Other style
More styles
Language
  • de-DE
  • en-GB
  • en-US
  • fi-FI
  • nn-NO
  • nn-NB
  • sv-SE
  • Other locale
More languages
Output format
  • html
  • text
  • asciidoc
  • rtf