Change search
CiteExportLink to record
Permanent link

Direct link
Cite
Citation style
  • apa
  • ieee
  • modern-language-association-8th-edition
  • vancouver
  • apa.csl
  • Other style
More styles
Language
  • de-DE
  • en-GB
  • en-US
  • fi-FI
  • nn-NO
  • nn-NB
  • sv-SE
  • Other locale
More languages
Output format
  • html
  • text
  • asciidoc
  • rtf
Science and technology teacher education in South Africa and Sweden: A comparison of linked policies and curricula
University of Limpopo, South Africa.
University of Gothenburg.
University of Witwatersrand, South Africa.
University of Gothenburg.
Show others and affiliations
2022 (English)In: Science and Technology Teacher Education in the Anthropocene: Addressing Challenges in the North and South / [ed] Miranda Rocksén, Elaosi Vhurumuku, Maria Svensson, Emmanuel Mushayikwa, Audrey Msimanga, Taylor & Francis, 2022, 1, p. 33-54Chapter in book (Other academic)
Abstract [en]

Sustainable living implies protecting our natural resources without compromising the needs of the next generations. Education has the power to transform humans’ perspectives and behaviour, which in turn, inculcates sustainable practices in all aspects of their lives. The United Nations (UN) called for education for sustainable development (ESD) as a global initiative towards transforming education for sustainability. This initiative catalysed this comparative study on teacher education policy and linked curricula between South Africa and Sweden. The major focus of this study is to compare policies and curricula in science and technology teacher education in South Africa and Sweden. The study illuminates and explores the status quo regarding ESD in the participating universities in South Africa and Sweden. Aspects of sustainability are investigated through document analysis of: the legislative teacher education policies; school science and technology curricula; and sampled modules for relevant institutional science and technology teacher education curricula. University subject experts conducted the analysis of policy documents and university curricula, using an agreed analytic tool. The data analysis reveals similarities and differences in policies and curricula with regard to ESD. The study recommends a rethink and reform of the content and methodology modules offered to initial teacher education students.

Place, publisher, year, edition, pages
Taylor & Francis, 2022, 1. p. 33-54
National Category
Educational Sciences
Research subject
Geography; Education
Identifiers
URN: urn:nbn:se:kau:diva-91822DOI: 10.4324/9781003190158-4Scopus ID: 2-s2.0-85136020966ISBN: 9781000587326 (print)ISBN: 9781032039947 (print)OAI: oai:DiVA.org:kau-91822DiVA, id: diva2:1694119
Available from: 2022-09-08 Created: 2022-09-08 Last updated: 2022-12-05Bibliographically approved

Open Access in DiVA

No full text in DiVA

Other links

Publisher's full textScopus

Authority records

Christenson, Nina

Search in DiVA

By author/editor
Christenson, Nina
By organisation
Department of Geography, Media and Communication (from 2013)Science, Mathematics and Engineering Education Research
Educational Sciences

Search outside of DiVA

GoogleGoogle Scholar

doi
isbn
urn-nbn

Altmetric score

doi
isbn
urn-nbn
Total: 164 hits
CiteExportLink to record
Permanent link

Direct link
Cite
Citation style
  • apa
  • ieee
  • modern-language-association-8th-edition
  • vancouver
  • apa.csl
  • Other style
More styles
Language
  • de-DE
  • en-GB
  • en-US
  • fi-FI
  • nn-NO
  • nn-NB
  • sv-SE
  • Other locale
More languages
Output format
  • html
  • text
  • asciidoc
  • rtf