Change search
CiteExportLink to record
Permanent link

Direct link
Cite
Citation style
  • apa
  • ieee
  • modern-language-association-8th-edition
  • vancouver
  • apa.csl
  • Other style
More styles
Language
  • de-DE
  • en-GB
  • en-US
  • fi-FI
  • nn-NO
  • nn-NB
  • sv-SE
  • Other locale
More languages
Output format
  • html
  • text
  • asciidoc
  • rtf
Sexually Coercive Behavior in Male Youth: Population Survey of General and Specific Risk Factors
Lund University.ORCID iD: 0000-0002-4416-1223
Lund University.ORCID iD: 0000-0001-8386-8881
Linköping University.
Karolinska institutet.ORCID iD: 0000-0002-2686-6799
2010 (English)In: Archives of Sexual Behavior, ISSN 0004-0002, E-ISSN 1573-2800, Vol. 39, no 5, p. 1161-1169Article in journal (Refereed) Published
Abstract [en]

Little is known about risk/protective factors for sexually coercive behavior in general population youth. We used a Swedish school-based population survey of sexual attitudes and experiences (response rate 77%) and investigated literature-based variables across sexually coercive (SEX), non-sexual conduct problem (CP), and normal control (NC) participants to identify general and specific risk/protective factors for sexual coercion. Among 1,933 male youth, 101 (5.2%) reported sexual coercion (ever talked or forced somebody into genital, oral, or anal sex) (SEX), 132 (6.8%) were classified as CP, and the remaining 1,700 (87.9%) as NC. Of 29 tested variables, 25 were more common in both SEX and CP compared to NC youth, including minority ethnicity, separated parents, vocational study program, risk-taking, aggressiveness, depressive symptoms, substance abuse, sexual victimization, extensive sexual experiences, and sexual preoccupation. When compared to CP youth only, SEX youth more often followed academic study programs, used less drugs and were less risk-taking. Further, SEX more frequently than CP youth reported gender stereotypic and pro-rape attitudes, sexual preoccupation, prostitution, and friends using violent porn. Finally, in a multivariate logistic regression, academic study program, pro-rape attitudes, sexual preoccupation, and less risk-taking independently remained more strongly associated with SEX compared to CP offending. In conclusion, several sociodemographic, family, and individual risk/protective factors were common to non-sexual and sexually coercive antisocial behavior in late adolescence. However, pro-rape cognitions, and sexual preoccupation, were sexuality-related, specific risk factors. The findings could inform preventive efforts and the assessment and treatment of sexually coercive male youth.

Place, publisher, year, edition, pages
Springer, 2010. Vol. 39, no 5, p. 1161-1169
Keywords [en]
Sexual violence, Conduct problems, Sexual behavior, Pornography, Population survey, Male youth
National Category
Public Health, Global Health and Social Medicine Psychiatry
Research subject
Public Health Science; Psychology
Identifiers
URN: urn:nbn:se:kau:diva-87642DOI: 10.1007/s10508-009-9572-9ISI: 000281597000017PubMedID: 19888644OAI: oai:DiVA.org:kau-87642DiVA, id: diva2:1616740
Available from: 2021-12-03 Created: 2021-12-03 Last updated: 2025-02-20Bibliographically approved

Open Access in DiVA

No full text in DiVA

Other links

Publisher's full textPubMed

Authority records

Priebe, Gisela

Search in DiVA

By author/editor
Kjellgren, CeciliaPriebe, GiselaLångström, Niklas
In the same journal
Archives of Sexual Behavior
Public Health, Global Health and Social MedicinePsychiatry

Search outside of DiVA

GoogleGoogle Scholar

doi
pubmed
urn-nbn

Altmetric score

doi
pubmed
urn-nbn
Total: 110 hits
CiteExportLink to record
Permanent link

Direct link
Cite
Citation style
  • apa
  • ieee
  • modern-language-association-8th-edition
  • vancouver
  • apa.csl
  • Other style
More styles
Language
  • de-DE
  • en-GB
  • en-US
  • fi-FI
  • nn-NO
  • nn-NB
  • sv-SE
  • Other locale
More languages
Output format
  • html
  • text
  • asciidoc
  • rtf