System disruptions
We are currently experiencing disruptions on the search portals due to high traffic. We are working to resolve the issue, you may temporarily encounter an error message.
Change search
CiteExportLink to record
Permanent link

Direct link
Cite
Citation style
  • apa
  • ieee
  • modern-language-association-8th-edition
  • vancouver
  • apa.csl
  • Other style
More styles
Language
  • de-DE
  • en-GB
  • en-US
  • fi-FI
  • nn-NO
  • nn-NB
  • sv-SE
  • Other locale
More languages
Output format
  • html
  • text
  • asciidoc
  • rtf
Evaluation of the thickness and roughness of homogeneous surface layers on spherical and irregular powder particles
Chalmers University of Technology.
Chalmers University of Technology.ORCID iD: 0000-0001-5140-9074
Chalmers University of Technology.
Chalmers University of Technology.
2014 (English)In: Surface and Interface Analysis, ISSN 0142-2421, E-ISSN 1096-9918, Vol. 46, no 10-11, p. 1028-1032Article in journal (Refereed) Published
Abstract [en]

The present study describes the development of a theoretical model for estimating the thickness of homogeneous surface layers on spherical and irregular shaped powder particles using the XPS depth profiling. As opposed to flat surfaces, such an approach for substrates of specific geometry is not straightforward. One needs to consider those geometrical factors associated with the experimental setup and sample's roughness, which impose an angle dependence on the photoelectrons peak intensity, X-ray flux and ion etch rate over the surface in question in order to evaluate it. The novelty of the current model lies in the introduction of geometrical freedom in connection to the experimental arrangement, which can be tailored to match the needs of contemporary instruments. The model was evaluated experimentally by analyzing the surface oxide layers on metal powder grades of different morphology. Complementary analytical techniques such as high resolution (HR) SEM and focused ion beam (FIB) were used in combination to further characterize the surface layers prior to the XPS investigations. The results reveal that the estimation of the oxide/metal interface from the measured relative metal intensity signal as function of etch depth using the model is in extremely good agreement with the corresponding values from direct measurement of HR SEM on FIB cross-sectioned powder samples. The model deviates slightly only for the irregular shaped powder, which can be regarded as means for quantification of surface roughness of the material. The model is used as a basis for a computer software that estimates the thickness of surface layers for powdered materials. 

Place, publisher, year, edition, pages
John Wiley & Sons, 2014. Vol. 46, no 10-11, p. 1028-1032
Keywords [en]
FIB-SEM, HR SEM, Metal powder, Surface layers, Thickness determination, XPS, Depth profiling, Geometry, Ion beams, Morphology, Powder metals, X ray photoelectron spectroscopy, Experimental arrangement, FIB SEM, Homogeneous surfaces, Oxide/metal interfaces, Theoretical modeling, XPS depth profiling, Surface roughness
National Category
Materials Engineering
Research subject
Materials Science
Identifiers
URN: urn:nbn:se:kau:diva-86929DOI: 10.1002/sia.5439ISI: 000344987400078Scopus ID: 2-s2.0-84908214012OAI: oai:DiVA.org:kau-86929DiVA, id: diva2:1608862
Available from: 2021-11-04 Created: 2021-11-04 Last updated: 2021-12-21Bibliographically approved

Open Access in DiVA

No full text in DiVA

Other links

Publisher's full textScopus

Authority records

Dimitrios, Nikas

Search in DiVA

By author/editor
Dimitrios, Nikas
In the same journal
Surface and Interface Analysis
Materials Engineering

Search outside of DiVA

GoogleGoogle Scholar

doi
urn-nbn

Altmetric score

doi
urn-nbn
Total: 8 hits
CiteExportLink to record
Permanent link

Direct link
Cite
Citation style
  • apa
  • ieee
  • modern-language-association-8th-edition
  • vancouver
  • apa.csl
  • Other style
More styles
Language
  • de-DE
  • en-GB
  • en-US
  • fi-FI
  • nn-NO
  • nn-NB
  • sv-SE
  • Other locale
More languages
Output format
  • html
  • text
  • asciidoc
  • rtf