Change search
CiteExportLink to record
Permanent link

Direct link
Cite
Citation style
  • apa
  • ieee
  • modern-language-association-8th-edition
  • vancouver
  • apa.csl
  • Other style
More styles
Language
  • de-DE
  • en-GB
  • en-US
  • fi-FI
  • nn-NO
  • nn-NB
  • sv-SE
  • Other locale
More languages
Output format
  • html
  • text
  • asciidoc
  • rtf
Drivers of taxonomic, functional and phylogenetic diversities in dominant ground-dwelling arthropods of coastal heathlands
University Rennes, FRA.ORCID iD: 0000-0002-2071-8541
Karlstad University, Faculty of Health, Science and Technology (starting 2013), Department of Environmental and Life Sciences (from 2013). University Rennes, FRA.ORCID iD: 0000-0002-6205-611x
University Rennes, FRA.
University Bretagne, FRA.
Show others and affiliations
2021 (English)In: Oecologia, ISSN 0029-8549, E-ISSN 1432-1939, Vol. 197, p. 511-522Article in journal (Refereed) Published
Abstract [en]

Although functional and phylogenetic diversities are increasingly used in ecology for a variety of purposes, their relationship remains unclear, and this relationship likely differs among taxa, yet most recent studies focused on plants. We hypothesize that communities may be diverse in functional traits due to presence of: many phylogenetic lineages, trait divergence within lineages, many species and random functional variation among species, weak filtering of traits in favorable environments, or strong trait divergence in unfavorable environments. We tested these predictions for taxa showing higher (ants), or lower (spiders, ground beetles) degrees of competition and niche construction, both of which might decouple functional traits from phylogenetic position or from the environment. Studying > 11,000 individuals and 216 species from coastal heathlands, we estimated functional as minimum spanning trees using traits related to the morphology, feeding habits and dispersal, respectively. Relationships between functional and phylogenetic diversities were overall positive and strong. In ants, this relationship disappeared after accounting for taxonomic diversities and environments, whereas in beetles and spiders taxonomic diversity is related to functional diversity only via increasing phylogenetic diversity. Environmental constraints reduced functional diversity in ants, but affected functional diversity only indirectly via phylogenetic diversity (ground beetles) and taxonomic and then phylogenetic diversity (spiders and ground beetles). Results are consistent with phylogenetic conservatism in traits in spiders and ground beetles. In ants, in contrast, traits appear more phylogenetically neutral with any new species potentially representing a new trait state, tentatively suggesting that competition or niche construction might decouple phylogenetics from trait diversity.

Place, publisher, year, edition, pages
2021. Vol. 197, p. 511-522
Keywords [en]
Neutral theory, Phylogenetic conservatism, Functional trait, Spiders, Carabids, Ants, Maritime clifftops, Habitat filtering
National Category
Ecology
Research subject
Environmental Science
Identifiers
URN: urn:nbn:se:kau:diva-86163DOI: 10.1007/s00442-021-05032-4ISI: 000696748800001PubMedID: 34535833Scopus ID: 2-s2.0-85115053126OAI: oai:DiVA.org:kau-86163DiVA, id: diva2:1602018
Available from: 2021-10-11 Created: 2021-10-11 Last updated: 2022-05-23Bibliographically approved

Open Access in DiVA

No full text in DiVA

Other links

Publisher's full textPubMedScopus

Authority records

Lafage, Denis

Search in DiVA

By author/editor
Hacala, AxelLafage, Denis
By organisation
Department of Environmental and Life Sciences (from 2013)
In the same journal
Oecologia
Ecology

Search outside of DiVA

GoogleGoogle Scholar

doi
pubmed
urn-nbn

Altmetric score

doi
pubmed
urn-nbn
Total: 48 hits
CiteExportLink to record
Permanent link

Direct link
Cite
Citation style
  • apa
  • ieee
  • modern-language-association-8th-edition
  • vancouver
  • apa.csl
  • Other style
More styles
Language
  • de-DE
  • en-GB
  • en-US
  • fi-FI
  • nn-NO
  • nn-NB
  • sv-SE
  • Other locale
More languages
Output format
  • html
  • text
  • asciidoc
  • rtf