Change search
CiteExportLink to record
Permanent link

Direct link
Cite
Citation style
  • apa
  • ieee
  • modern-language-association-8th-edition
  • vancouver
  • apa.csl
  • Other style
More styles
Language
  • de-DE
  • en-GB
  • en-US
  • fi-FI
  • nn-NO
  • nn-NB
  • sv-SE
  • Other locale
More languages
Output format
  • html
  • text
  • asciidoc
  • rtf
Professional learning that enables the development of critical praxis
Charles Sturt University, AUS.
Karlstad University, Faculty of Arts and Social Sciences (starting 2013), Department of Educational Studies (from 2013).ORCID iD: 0000-0001-5086-6126
University of Sydney, AUS.
2023 (English)In: Professional Development in Education, ISSN 1941-5257, E-ISSN 1941-5265, Vol. 49, no 5, p. 938-952Article in journal (Refereed) Published
Abstract [en]

Professional learning is increasingly understood as vital for the development of educators, and for the development of a strong educational system. We argue that the most essential purpose of professional learning is for the development of critical praxis. Critical praxis is related to action that is morally, socially and politically informed. This action is undertaken with an awareness of possible consequences together with the intention to make positive contributions to society and to humankind. Critical praxis in education is an intentional action (or associated reflexivity) informed by critical questioning related to the social, moral and political purpose of education. Critical praxis is tightly connected with learning experiences. This article looks at three examples of the development of critical praxis through professional learning, across three different educational settings. We explore the practice architectures that enable and constrain critical praxis in professional practice and identify three key themes in relation to the development of critical praxis: agency, power and relational trust. We argue that the potential power of professional learning is in supporting and developing the capacity to question institutionalised habits or educational practices that may be in conflict with values, purpose and moral intentions, in order to create positive change.

Place, publisher, year, edition, pages
Taylor & Francis, 2023. Vol. 49, no 5, p. 938-952
Keywords [en]
Professional learning, Praxis, theory of practice architectures, power, agency, trust
National Category
Educational Sciences
Research subject
Educational Work
Identifiers
URN: urn:nbn:se:kau:diva-83415DOI: 10.1080/19415257.2021.1879228ISI: 000616605800001Scopus ID: 2-s2.0-85101050700OAI: oai:DiVA.org:kau-83415DiVA, id: diva2:1536823
Available from: 2021-03-12 Created: 2021-03-12 Last updated: 2023-12-11Bibliographically approved

Open Access in DiVA

No full text in DiVA

Other links

Publisher's full textScopus

Authority records

Forssten Seiser, Anette

Search in DiVA

By author/editor
Forssten Seiser, Anette
By organisation
Department of Educational Studies (from 2013)
In the same journal
Professional Development in Education
Educational Sciences

Search outside of DiVA

GoogleGoogle Scholar

doi
urn-nbn

Altmetric score

doi
urn-nbn
Total: 600 hits
CiteExportLink to record
Permanent link

Direct link
Cite
Citation style
  • apa
  • ieee
  • modern-language-association-8th-edition
  • vancouver
  • apa.csl
  • Other style
More styles
Language
  • de-DE
  • en-GB
  • en-US
  • fi-FI
  • nn-NO
  • nn-NB
  • sv-SE
  • Other locale
More languages
Output format
  • html
  • text
  • asciidoc
  • rtf