Change search
CiteExportLink to record
Permanent link

Direct link
Cite
Citation style
  • apa
  • ieee
  • modern-language-association-8th-edition
  • vancouver
  • Other style
More styles
Language
  • de-DE
  • en-GB
  • en-US
  • fi-FI
  • nn-NO
  • nn-NB
  • sv-SE
  • Other locale
More languages
Output format
  • html
  • text
  • asciidoc
  • rtf
Barbara Wintersgill’s Big Ideas for Religious Education and the National Entitlement to the Study of Religions and Worldviews in England. Some reflections on a Big Ideas approach to curriculum planning in an English context from a participant in both projects.
Bath Spa University, UK.
2019 (English)In: Nordidactica: Journal of Humanities and Social Science Education, ISSN 2000-9879, no 2019:4, p. 95-108Article in journal (Refereed) Published
Abstract [en]

This paper examines the thinking behind the six 'Big Ideas' suggested in Wintersgill 2017 as a way of deciding what is most important in RE and some of the ways in which this is being developed for practice. The project was based on the theory of 'Big Ideas' developed by Wiggins and McTighe and as applied to the science curriculum by Harlen et al.  It aimed to address questions such as how to select and sequence content, and how to make RE more coherent and more engaging for pupils. The paper discusses the suggestion that further 'Big Ideas' are needed, such as the Big Ideas concerned with methodology and epistemology proposed by Freathy and John 2019, or Big Ideas about religion such as theories of its origin and purpose. The relationship between Wintersgill's publication and the 'National Entitlement to the Study of Religion and Worldviews' proposed by the final report of the Commission on Religious Education 2018 is explored by the author who was involved in both projects. The 'National Entitlement' was developed with a similar concern to identify the essentials of RE, without which the subject (renamed by the Commission as 'Religion and Worldviews') cannot be grasped adequately. However, the attempt to provide depth rather than breadth of learning should not be translated into narrowing of content in the sense of a reduction in the religions and non-religious worldviews studied, but instead might even draw upon a wider range of religious and non-religious traditions.

Place, publisher, year, edition, pages
Karlstad: CSD Karlstad , 2019. no 2019:4, p. 95-108
Keywords [en]
BIG IDEAS, RELIGIOUS EDUCATION, COMMISSION ON RE IN ENGLAND
National Category
Didactics
Identifiers
URN: urn:nbn:se:kau:diva-76263OAI: oai:DiVA.org:kau-76263DiVA, id: diva2:1386097
Available from: 2020-01-16 Created: 2020-01-16 Last updated: 2020-01-16

Open Access in DiVA

fulltext(453 kB)220 downloads
File information
File name FULLTEXT01.pdfFile size 453 kBChecksum SHA-512
b530449093694e4d71fc5065649b5463913824a071d926fc2b8b4155ea260b3e13ad1acdd328b19f98b45fadada0b295b879a5f35950894409c8d13d9492500a
Type fulltextMimetype application/pdf

In the same journal
Nordidactica: Journal of Humanities and Social Science Education
Didactics

Search outside of DiVA

GoogleGoogle Scholar
Total: 220 downloads
The number of downloads is the sum of all downloads of full texts. It may include eg previous versions that are now no longer available

urn-nbn

Altmetric score

urn-nbn
Total: 68 hits
CiteExportLink to record
Permanent link

Direct link
Cite
Citation style
  • apa
  • ieee
  • modern-language-association-8th-edition
  • vancouver
  • Other style
More styles
Language
  • de-DE
  • en-GB
  • en-US
  • fi-FI
  • nn-NO
  • nn-NB
  • sv-SE
  • Other locale
More languages
Output format
  • html
  • text
  • asciidoc
  • rtf