Change search
CiteExportLink to record
Permanent link

Direct link
Cite
Citation style
  • apa
  • ieee
  • modern-language-association-8th-edition
  • vancouver
  • Other style
More styles
Language
  • de-DE
  • en-GB
  • en-US
  • fi-FI
  • nn-NO
  • nn-NB
  • sv-SE
  • Other locale
More languages
Output format
  • html
  • text
  • asciidoc
  • rtf
Climate-change and health effects of using rice husk for biochar-compost: Comparing three pyrolysis systems
Univ New England, Sch Environm & Rural Sci, Armidale, NSW 2351, Australia..ORCID iD: 0000-0002-8300-2786
Univ New England, Sch Environm & Rural Sci, Armidale, NSW 2351, Australia.;Beef Ind Ctr, NSW Dept Primary Ind, Trevenna Rd, Armidale, NSW 2351, Australia..
KTH Royal Inst Technol, Dept Sustainable Dev Environm Sci & Engn SEED, SE-10044 Stockholm, Sweden.;Inst Soil Sci & Plant Cultivat, Dept Bioecon & Syst Anal, Czartoryskich 8 Str, PL-24100 Pulawy, Poland..
Show others and affiliations
2017 (English)In: Journal of Cleaner Production, ISSN 0959-6526, E-ISSN 1879-1786, Vol. 162, p. 260-272Article in journal (Refereed) Published
Abstract [en]

This study presents a comparative analysis of the environmental impacts of different biochar-compost (COMBI) systems in North Vietnam relative to the conventional practice of open burning of rice husks. Three COMBI systems, using different pyrolysis technologies (pyrolytic cook-stove, brick kiln and the BigChar 2200 unit) for conversion of rice husk into biochar were modelled. Biochar was assumed to be composted with manure and straw, and the biochar-compost produced from each system was assumed to be applied to paddy rice fields. Life Cycle Assessment (LCA) showed that the three COMBI systems significantly improved environmental and health impacts of rice husk management in spring and summer compared with open burning, in terms of climate change, particulate matter (PM) and human toxicity (HT) impacts. The differences between the three COMBI systems in the climate change and PM impacts were not significant, possibly due to the large uncertainties. In all systems, the suppression of soil CH4 emissions is the major contributor to the reduced climate effect for the COMBI systems, comprising 56% in spring and 40% in summer. The greatest reduction in the HT impact was offered by the BigChar 2200 system, where biochar is produced in a large-scale plant in which pyrolysis gases are used to generate heat rather than released into the atmosphere. (C) 2017 Elsevier Ltd. All rights reserved.

Place, publisher, year, edition, pages
ELSEVIER SCI LTD , 2017. Vol. 162, p. 260-272
Keywords [en]
Pyrolysis gases, Biochar, Compost, Methane emissions, Paddy rice
Identifiers
URN: urn:nbn:se:kau:diva-75581DOI: 10.1016/j.jclepro.2017.06.026ISI: 000407185500024OAI: oai:DiVA.org:kau-75581DiVA, id: diva2:1369472
Available from: 2019-11-12 Created: 2019-11-12 Last updated: 2019-11-12

Open Access in DiVA

No full text in DiVA

Other links

Publisher's full text

Authority records BETA

Mohammadi, Ali

Search in DiVA

By author/editor
Mohammadi, AliKristiansen, Paul
In the same journal
Journal of Cleaner Production

Search outside of DiVA

GoogleGoogle Scholar

doi
urn-nbn

Altmetric score

doi
urn-nbn
Total: 7 hits
CiteExportLink to record
Permanent link

Direct link
Cite
Citation style
  • apa
  • ieee
  • modern-language-association-8th-edition
  • vancouver
  • Other style
More styles
Language
  • de-DE
  • en-GB
  • en-US
  • fi-FI
  • nn-NO
  • nn-NB
  • sv-SE
  • Other locale
More languages
Output format
  • html
  • text
  • asciidoc
  • rtf