Change search
CiteExportLink to record
Permanent link

Direct link
Cite
Citation style
  • apa
  • ieee
  • modern-language-association-8th-edition
  • vancouver
  • apa.csl
  • Other style
More styles
Language
  • de-DE
  • en-GB
  • en-US
  • fi-FI
  • nn-NO
  • nn-NB
  • sv-SE
  • Other locale
More languages
Output format
  • html
  • text
  • asciidoc
  • rtf
Intensive care nurses fail to translate knowledge and skills into practice: A mixed-methods study on perceptions of oral care
Karlstad University, Faculty of Health, Science and Technology (starting 2013), Department of Health Sciences (from 2013).ORCID iD: 0000-0002-4381-4288
Karlstad University, Faculty of Health, Science and Technology (starting 2013), Department of Health Sciences (from 2013).ORCID iD: 0000-0001-7082-6834
Karlstad University, Faculty of Health, Science and Technology (starting 2013), Department of Health Sciences (from 2013).ORCID iD: 0000-0002-2667-4025
2019 (English)In: Intensive & Critical Care Nursing, ISSN 0964-3397, E-ISSN 1532-4036, Vol. 52, p. 51-60Article in journal (Refereed) Published
Abstract [en]

Objectives: To identify intensive care nurses’ perceptions of oral care according to Coker et al.'s (2013) conceptual framework and to contribute to the knowledge base of oral care in intensive care. Design/methods: This was a concurrent embedded mixed-methods design, with more weight given to the quantitative part. Participants responded to the Nursing Care related to Oral Health questionnaire, including perceptions of oral care antecedents (18 items), defining attributes (17 items), and consequences (6 items) and two open-ended questions. The data were analysed with descriptive and correlation statistics and qualitative content analysis. Setting: Intensive care nurses (n = 88) in six general intensive care units. Results: Intensive care nurses perceived that an important part of nursing care was oral care, especially to intubated patients. They perceived that the nursing staff was competent in oral care skills and had access to different kinds of equipment and supplies to provide oral care. The oral cavity was inspected on a daily basis, mostly without the use of any assessment instruments. Oral care seemed to be task-oriented, and documentation of the patients’ experiences of the oral care process was rare. Conclusions: The antecedents, knowledge and skills are available to provide quality oral care, but intensive care nurses seem to have difficulties translating these components into practice. Thus they might have to shift their task-oriented approach towards oral care to a more person-centred approach in order to be able to meet patients’ needs. © 2018 Elsevier Ltd

Place, publisher, year, edition, pages
Elsevier, 2019. Vol. 52, p. 51-60
Keywords [en]
Conceptual framework, Intensive care nurses, Mixed-method, Oral care, adult, article, content analysis, controlled study, documentation, female, human, intensive care unit, language, major clinical study, male, mouth cavity, mouth hygiene, nursing care, nursing staff, perception, quantitative analysis, questionnaire, skill, statistics
National Category
Nursing
Research subject
Nursing Science
Identifiers
URN: urn:nbn:se:kau:diva-70243DOI: 10.1016/j.iccn.2018.09.006ISI: 000463611200009PubMedID: 30297151Scopus ID: 2-s2.0-85054505634OAI: oai:DiVA.org:kau-70243DiVA, id: diva2:1265111
Note

Conflict of interest statement: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.iccn.2019.02.001

Available from: 2018-11-22 Created: 2018-11-22 Last updated: 2020-09-03Bibliographically approved
In thesis
1. Oral care quality in intensive care units and short-term care units: Nursing staff and older people's perspectives
Open this publication in new window or tab >>Oral care quality in intensive care units and short-term care units: Nursing staff and older people's perspectives
2019 (English)Doctoral thesis, comprehensive summary (Other academic)
Abstract [en]

The overall aim of this thesis was to investigate oral care and its quality through the perspectives of nursing staff in intensive care units and short-term care units and from the perspectives of older people in short-term care units. Methods: The mix-method study (I) had a concurrent embedded design and was cross-sectional. Eighty-eight intensive care nurses (response rate (RR) 40%) responded to the Nursing Care related to Oral Health questionnaire, and the data were analysed with analytic statistics and qualitative content analysis. The quantitative studies (II-IV), which were also cross-sectional, included 432 nursing staff in intensive care and short-term care (RR 51–52%) and 391 older people (RR 77%) in short-term care units. Participants responded to the modified version of the Quality from Patients’ Perspective instrument and provided information about person-related conditions. Descriptive and analytical statistics were used. Main results: Intensive care nurses perceived having the antecedents, knowledge, and skills to provide optimal oral care quality, but the result indicated that they were having difficulties putting these into practice (I). Areas for improvement in oral care quality were identified in both care environments (II). Older people preferred personalised information about oral health and oral care (III). Nursing staff as well as older people’s perceptions of oral care quality and its humanity aspects, seemed to be related to person-related conditions and differed between the two care environments. In short-term care, nursing staff’s preferences for the humanity aspects of oral care quality were higher compared to older people’s preferences (IV). Conclusion: Oral care is complicated and proactive and requires registered nurses’ and other nursing staff’s attention as well as educational and organisational initiatives. Many older people were assessed to have oral health problems. With early identification and optimal oral care, unnecessary suffering might be prevented. The identified quality improvement areas might guide RNs, nurse managers, and other nursing staff to further oral care quality development.

Abstract [en]

Oral care is complex and multifaceted, and knowledge about nursing staff and older people’s perceptions of oral care quality are limited. The overall aim was to investigate oral care and its quality through the perspectives of nursing staff in intensive care units and short-term care units and from the perspectives of older people in short-term care units.

Intensive-care nurses perceived having the antecedents, knowledge, and skills needed to provide optimal oral care quality, but the result indicated that they were having difficulties putting these into practice. Areas for improvement in oral care quality were identified in both care environments. Older people preferred personalised information about oral health and oral care. Perceptions of oral care quality and its humanity aspects, seemed to be related to person-related conditions, and differed between nursing staff in different units and older people.

Oral care is complicated and proactive and requires registered nurses’ and other nursing staff’s attention as well as educational and organisational initiatives. Many older people were assessed to have oral health problems. With early identification and optimal oral care, unnecessary suffering might be prevented. The identified quality improvement areas might RNs, nurse managers, and other nursing staff to guide further oral care quality development.

Place, publisher, year, edition, pages
Karlstads universitet, 2019. p. 114
Series
Karlstad University Studies, ISSN 1403-8099 ; 2019:14
Keywords
Oral care, quality of care, intensive care, short-term care, older people’s perceptions, nursing staff’s perceptions, person-related conditions
National Category
Health Sciences
Research subject
Nursing Science
Identifiers
urn:nbn:se:kau:diva-71820 (URN)978-91-7867-020-8 (ISBN)978-91-7867-025-3 (ISBN)
Public defence
2019-06-14, 1A305, Lagerlöfsalen, 10:00 (Swedish)
Opponent
Supervisors
Note

Artikel 4 i avhandlingen som manuskript. Nu publicerad.

Available from: 2019-05-16 Created: 2019-04-11 Last updated: 2020-04-02Bibliographically approved

Open Access in DiVA

No full text in DiVA

Other links

Publisher's full textPubMedScopus

Authority records

Andersson, MariaWilde-Larsson, BodilPersenius Wentzel, Mona

Search in DiVA

By author/editor
Andersson, MariaWilde-Larsson, BodilPersenius Wentzel, Mona
By organisation
Department of Health Sciences (from 2013)
In the same journal
Intensive & Critical Care Nursing
Nursing

Search outside of DiVA

GoogleGoogle Scholar

doi
pubmed
urn-nbn

Altmetric score

doi
pubmed
urn-nbn
Total: 698 hits
CiteExportLink to record
Permanent link

Direct link
Cite
Citation style
  • apa
  • ieee
  • modern-language-association-8th-edition
  • vancouver
  • apa.csl
  • Other style
More styles
Language
  • de-DE
  • en-GB
  • en-US
  • fi-FI
  • nn-NO
  • nn-NB
  • sv-SE
  • Other locale
More languages
Output format
  • html
  • text
  • asciidoc
  • rtf