Change search
CiteExportLink to record
Permanent link

Direct link
Cite
Citation style
  • apa
  • harvard1
  • ieee
  • modern-language-association-8th-edition
  • vancouver
  • Other style
More styles
Language
  • de-DE
  • en-GB
  • en-US
  • fi-FI
  • nn-NO
  • nn-NB
  • sv-SE
  • Other locale
More languages
Output format
  • html
  • text
  • asciidoc
  • rtf
Effects of a common insecticide on wetland communities with varying quality of leaf litter inputs
Rensselaer Polytech Inst, Darrin Fresh Water Inst, Troy, NY 12180 USA..
Rensselaer Polytech Inst, Darrin Fresh Water Inst, Troy, NY 12180 USA..
Rensselaer Polytech Inst, Darrin Fresh Water Inst, Troy, NY 12180 USA..
Rensselaer Polytech Inst, Darrin Fresh Water Inst, Troy, NY 12180 USA..
Show others and affiliations
2017 (English)In: Environmental Pollution, ISSN 0269-7491, E-ISSN 1873-6424, Vol. 226, p. 452-462Article in journal (Refereed) Published
Abstract [en]

Chemical contamination of aquatic systems often co-occurs with dramatic changes in surrounding terrestrial vegetation. Plant leaf litter serves as a crucial resource input to many freshwater systems, and changes in litter species composition can alter the attributes of freshwater communities. However, little is known how variation in litter inputs interacts with chemical contaminants. We investigated the ecological effects resulting from changes in tree leaf litter inputs to freshwater communities, and how those changes might interact with the timing of insecticide contamination. Using the common insecticide malathion, we hypothesized that inputs of nutrient-rich and labile leaf litter (e.g., elm [Ulmus spp.] or maple [Acer spp.]) would reduce the negative effects of insecticides on wetland communities relative to inputs of recalcitrant litter (e.g., oak [Quercus spp.]). We exposed artificial wetland communities to a factorial combination of three litter species treatments (elm, maple, and oak) and four insecticide treatments (no insecticide, small weekly doses of 10 mu g L-1, and either early or late large doses of 50 mu g L-1). Communities consisted of microbes, algae, snails, amphipods, zooplankton, and two species of tadpoles. After two months, we found that maple and elm litter generally induced greater primary and secondary production. Insecticides induced a reduction in the abundance of amphipods and some zooplankton species, and increased phytoplanlcton. In addition, we found interactive effects of litter species and insecticide treatments on amphibian responses, although specific effects depended on application regime. Specifically, with the addition of insecticide, elm and maple litter induced a reduction in gray tree frog survival, oak and elm litter delayed tree frog metamorphosis, and oak and maple litter reduced green frog tadpole mass. Our results suggest that attention to local forest composition, as well as the timing of pesticide application might help ameliorate the harmful effects of pesticides observed in freshwater systems. (C) 2017 Elsevier Ltd. All rights reserved.

Place, publisher, year, edition, pages
Elsevier, 2017. Vol. 226, p. 452-462
Keywords [en]
Acetylcholine esterase inhibitor, Larval anuran, Hyla versicolor, Lithobates clamitans, Organophosphate
National Category
Ecology
Research subject
Biology
Identifiers
URN: urn:nbn:se:kau:diva-70080DOI: 10.1016/j.envpol.2017.04.019ISI: 000405881800048PubMedID: 28431762OAI: oai:DiVA.org:kau-70080DiVA, id: diva2:1261822
Available from: 2018-11-08 Created: 2018-11-08 Last updated: 2018-12-06Bibliographically approved

Open Access in DiVA

No full text in DiVA

Other links

Publisher's full textPubMed

Authority records BETA

Lind, Lovisa

Search in DiVA

By author/editor
Lind, Lovisa
In the same journal
Environmental Pollution
Ecology

Search outside of DiVA

GoogleGoogle Scholar

doi
pubmed
urn-nbn

Altmetric score

doi
pubmed
urn-nbn
Total: 2 hits
CiteExportLink to record
Permanent link

Direct link
Cite
Citation style
  • apa
  • harvard1
  • ieee
  • modern-language-association-8th-edition
  • vancouver
  • Other style
More styles
Language
  • de-DE
  • en-GB
  • en-US
  • fi-FI
  • nn-NO
  • nn-NB
  • sv-SE
  • Other locale
More languages
Output format
  • html
  • text
  • asciidoc
  • rtf