Change search
CiteExportLink to record
Permanent link

Direct link
Cite
Citation style
  • apa
  • harvard1
  • ieee
  • modern-language-association-8th-edition
  • vancouver
  • Other style
More styles
Language
  • de-DE
  • en-GB
  • en-US
  • fi-FI
  • nn-NO
  • nn-NB
  • sv-SE
  • Other locale
More languages
Output format
  • html
  • text
  • asciidoc
  • rtf
Lessons Learned from Evaluating Workflow Management Systems
Karlstad University, Faculty of Health, Science and Technology (starting 2013), Department of Mathematics and Computer Science (from 2013). (Software Engineering, SERG)ORCID iD: 0000-0002-0107-2108
Software Institute, Faculty of Informatics, USI Lugano, Switzerland.
Distributed Systems Group, University of Bamberg, Germany.
Distributed Systems Group, University of Bamberg, Germany.
Show others and affiliations
2017 (English)In: Service-Oriented Computing – ICSOC 2017 Workshops, Springer, 2017, p. 215-227Conference paper, Published paper (Refereed)
Abstract [en]

Work ow Management Systems (WfMSs) today act as ser- vice composition engines and service-oriented middleware to enable the execution of automated business processes. Automation based on WfMSs promises to enable the model-driven construction of exible and easily maintainable services with high-performance characteristics. In the past decade, signi cant e ort has been invested into standardizing WfMSs that compose services, with standards such as the Web Services Business Process Execution Language (WS-BPEL) or the Business Process Model and Notation (BPMN). One of the aims of standardization is to enable users of WfMSs to compare di erent systems and to avoid vendor lock-in. Despite these e orts, there are many expectations concerning portabil- ity, performance e ciency, usability, reliability and maintainability of WfMSs that are likely to be unful lled. In this work, we synthesize the ndings of two research initiatives that deal with WfMSs conformance and performance benchmarking to distill a set of lessons learned and best practices. These ndings provide useful advice for practitioners who plan to evaluate and use WfMSs and for WfMS vendors that would like to foster wider adoption of process-centric service composition middleware. 

Place, publisher, year, edition, pages
Springer, 2017. p. 215-227
Series
Lecture Notes in Computer Science ; 0797
Keywords [en]
Workflow Management Systems, Standards, Lessons Learned, Evaluation Research, Benchmarking, Service Composition
National Category
Computer Sciences Software Engineering Other Computer and Information Science
Research subject
Computer Science
Identifiers
URN: urn:nbn:se:kau:diva-65602DOI: 10.1007/978-3-319-91764-1_17ISBN: 978-3-319-91763-4 (print)OAI: oai:DiVA.org:kau-65602DiVA, id: diva2:1174190
Conference
13th International Workshop on Engineering Service-Oriented Applications and Cloud Services (WESOACS) co-located with the 15th International Conference on Service-Oriented Computing (ICSOC), Malaga, Spain, November 13th, 2017
Available from: 2018-01-15 Created: 2018-01-15 Last updated: 2018-07-05Bibliographically approved

Open Access in DiVA

No full text in DiVA

Other links

Publisher's full textFull textConference

Authority records BETA

Lenhard, Jörg

Search in DiVA

By author/editor
Lenhard, Jörg
By organisation
Department of Mathematics and Computer Science (from 2013)
Computer SciencesSoftware EngineeringOther Computer and Information Science

Search outside of DiVA

GoogleGoogle Scholar

doi
isbn
urn-nbn

Altmetric score

doi
isbn
urn-nbn
Total: 31 hits
CiteExportLink to record
Permanent link

Direct link
Cite
Citation style
  • apa
  • harvard1
  • ieee
  • modern-language-association-8th-edition
  • vancouver
  • Other style
More styles
Language
  • de-DE
  • en-GB
  • en-US
  • fi-FI
  • nn-NO
  • nn-NB
  • sv-SE
  • Other locale
More languages
Output format
  • html
  • text
  • asciidoc
  • rtf