Change search
CiteExportLink to record
Permanent link

Direct link
Cite
Citation style
  • apa
  • ieee
  • modern-language-association-8th-edition
  • vancouver
  • apa.csl
  • Other style
More styles
Language
  • de-DE
  • en-GB
  • en-US
  • fi-FI
  • nn-NO
  • nn-NB
  • sv-SE
  • Other locale
More languages
Output format
  • html
  • text
  • asciidoc
  • rtf
Market Orientation in Public Service: A comparison between buyers and providers
Karlstad University, Faculty of Arts and Social Sciences (starting 2013), Karlstad Business School (from 2013).
Karlstad University, Faculty of Arts and Social Sciences (starting 2013), Service Research Center (from 2013). (Samot - The service and market oriented research group)ORCID iD: 0000-0003-1419-2667
Karlstad University, Faculty of Arts and Social Sciences (starting 2013), Karlstad Business School (from 2013). (CTF)ORCID iD: 0000-0002-7475-680X
2018 (English)In: Journal of Nonprofit & Public Sector Marketing, ISSN 1049-5142, E-ISSN 1540-6997, Vol. 30, no 1, p. 1-21Article in journal (Refereed) Published
Abstract [en]

Public services have been subjected to processes of deregulation, competition, and privatization in many countries worldwide. One popular reform has involved focusing on competitive procurement. This context, where public and private organizations jointly deliver the service in a dyad, makes the market orientation of public services highly complex. The main elements of market orientation – intelligence generation, intelligence dissemination and responsiveness– have shown themselves to be valid and of significance in both the private and public sectors. Nevertheless, the empirical context of the public sector involves a complexity that has been poorly addressed in market orientation research. In this study, we research the Swedish public transport industry and survey buyer and provider organizations in order to determine how market-orientated activities are approached in public-private service dyads. We present three theoretically-underpinned relationship types - buyer dominated, provider dominated and collaborative - which we suggest as having implications for market-oriented activities. A survey of public transport authorities’ (buyers, n = 48) and operators’ (providers, n = 49) market orientation activities reveals the concurrent prevalence of characteristics from all three relationship types, as both parties try to dominate the relationship while also engaging in collaborative efforts. Drawing on our theoretical framework and our empirical results, we conclude that there are legitimate differences in the perspectives of buyers and providers, and that these differences, if acknowledged and properly managed, can provide valuable resources in the development of a joint market orientation in complex public-private settings.

Place, publisher, year, edition, pages
Taylor & Francis, 2018. Vol. 30, no 1, p. 1-21
National Category
Economics and Business
Research subject
Business Administration; Psychology
Identifiers
URN: urn:nbn:se:kau:diva-63674DOI: 10.1080/10495142.2017.1326342ISI: 000425427900004OAI: oai:DiVA.org:kau-63674DiVA, id: diva2:1141253
Available from: 2017-09-14 Created: 2017-09-14 Last updated: 2021-04-05Bibliographically approved
In thesis
1. Enacting, Enabling, and Embracing Market Orientation: A study of Public–Private Dyads
Open this publication in new window or tab >>Enacting, Enabling, and Embracing Market Orientation: A study of Public–Private Dyads
2021 (English)Doctoral thesis, comprehensive summary (Other academic)
Abstract [en]

This thesis contributes to an increased understanding of how public–private dyads enact (“what”), enable (“how”), and embrace (“why”) market orientation. Drawing on a multi-year study of Swedish public transport, the thesis shows that the nature of the relationship between public and private organizations plays an important role in how market orientation is undertaken in dyadic practice.

Through a longitudinal research approach, it was found that private providers’ involvement in market-oriented activities has increased, and that the dyadic actors are more frequently involved in disseminating activities such as meetings and informal contact. Providers’ increased role in the enactment of dyadic market orientation indicates a movement towards a more collaborative approach within the dyad. The collaborative approach adheres to organizational roles as partners where relational management is focused, and the market-oriented activities are characterized by participative decision-making and both formal and informal information sharing. Dyads where a closer interaction is not desired tend to rely on a coordinative approach where the formal arrangements (such as the contract) play a prominent enabling role in the management of market orientation. This aligns with the view of public providers as subcontractors and the public organization as a buyer with a dominating role in the market orientation of the dyad.

The thesis shows that, in comparison to private providers, public organizations perceive the relationship to be characterized by a higher level of conflict, more conflicting goals, and a lower degree of trust and commitment. It is further suggested that such perceptions of relational dynamics stem from the view of unalignable public and private values such as profitability and social value. The difficulty in aligning values and bridging the raison d’être explains why the public organizations’ tendency to refrain from sharing control and responsibility largely persists despite an increase in collaborative efforts. 

Abstract [en]

This thesis contributes to an increased understanding of how public–private dyads enact (“what”), enable (“how”), and embrace (“why”) market orientation. Drawing on a multi-year study of Swedish public transport, the thesis shows that the nature of the relationship between the public and the private organization plays an important role in how market orientation is undertaken in dyadic practice.

The findings show that the enactment of market orientation has shifted towards an increase of service providers’ involvement in market-oriented activities, and that the dyadic actors are more frequently involved in disseminating activities such as meetings and informal contact. Such a development also entails a more collaborative approach within the dyad. Still, formal arrangements (such as the contract) play a prominent enabling role in the management of market orientation.

It is suggested that the organizations’ emphasized values and perception of the dyad’s raison d’être give rise to an approach to market orientation of the dyad that is primarily characterized by either collaboration or coordination, but that the two forms also intermingle, often in complex ways.

Place, publisher, year, edition, pages
Karlstad: Karlstads universitet, 2021. p. 103
Series
Karlstad University Studies, ISSN 1403-8099 ; 2021:12
Keywords
market orientation, public service, public-private relationships, public procurement, public transport, collaboration, coordination
National Category
Business Administration
Research subject
Business Administration
Identifiers
urn:nbn:se:kau:diva-83580 (URN)978-91-7867-197-7 (ISBN)978-91-7867-207-3 (ISBN)
Public defence
2021-05-12, Erlandersalen, 11D 227; Zoom, Universitetsgatan 2, 651 88, Karlstad, 10:00 (Swedish)
Opponent
Supervisors
Available from: 2021-04-21 Created: 2021-04-05 Last updated: 2021-04-21Bibliographically approved

Open Access in DiVA

No full text in DiVA

Other links

Publisher's full text

Authority records

Molander, SofiaFellesson, MarkusFriman, Margareta

Search in DiVA

By author/editor
Molander, SofiaFellesson, MarkusFriman, Margareta
By organisation
Karlstad Business School (from 2013)Service Research Center (from 2013)
In the same journal
Journal of Nonprofit & Public Sector Marketing
Economics and Business

Search outside of DiVA

GoogleGoogle Scholar

doi
urn-nbn

Altmetric score

doi
urn-nbn
Total: 241 hits
CiteExportLink to record
Permanent link

Direct link
Cite
Citation style
  • apa
  • ieee
  • modern-language-association-8th-edition
  • vancouver
  • apa.csl
  • Other style
More styles
Language
  • de-DE
  • en-GB
  • en-US
  • fi-FI
  • nn-NO
  • nn-NB
  • sv-SE
  • Other locale
More languages
Output format
  • html
  • text
  • asciidoc
  • rtf