Change search
CiteExportLink to record
Permanent link

Direct link
Cite
Citation style
  • apa
  • ieee
  • modern-language-association-8th-edition
  • vancouver
  • apa.csl
  • Other style
More styles
Language
  • de-DE
  • en-GB
  • en-US
  • fi-FI
  • nn-NO
  • nn-NB
  • sv-SE
  • Other locale
More languages
Output format
  • html
  • text
  • asciidoc
  • rtf
Feedback och respons på elevtexter - ur lärar- och elevperspektiv
2005 (Swedish)Independent thesis Basic level (professional degree)Student thesis
Abstract [en]

This essay deals with how feedback and response on students' texts is carried out in the language education. The purpose with the study is to find out how the work with feedback on students' texts is dealt with, from students' view and teachers' view. The essay is also comparing the work with feedback and response in the different grades in school, for instance, the intermediate level of the school(sw. mellanstadiet), the senior level of the school(sw. högstadiet) and the upper secondary school (sw. gymnasiet). I interviewed seven persons and every interview took about thirty minutes. The informants were four students and three teachers. Three of the students are pupils on the senior level of school and the other person is an upper secondary student. All teachers in the study work in the same senior level school, but in different "departments". The result of the study showed that the students in the senior level school received feedback and response together with the marks on their texts and did not have to hand in revised versions. The upper secondary student always writes a first draft which his teacher gives him feedback on. He then rewrites the text and hands it in to the teacher. After that the teacher makes the assessment on the final version on the text. Finally, the study showed that the work with feedback and response in school is carried out in different ways, but it is obvious that the students mostly receive written feedback on their texts. None of the students had worked with the method to let students work in groups giving each other feedback on their texts, and this was something the teachers did not let their students do either. All informants in the study thought that the way they worked with response developed better writers. Two of the students wanted more positive comments on their texts and one student wished that the teacher would give them oral response more often. There was a minor difference between the different grades in school and it was that more focus on the texts positive features was made during the intermediate level of the school than the higher levels, and one student thought that feedback was orally given more often during the intermediate level of school compared to the senior level of school.

Place, publisher, year, edition, pages
2005. , p. 31
Identifiers
URN: urn:nbn:se:kau:diva-62402Local ID: GL-92OAI: oai:DiVA.org:kau-62402DiVA, id: diva2:1127216
Educational program
Primary Education Programme, 240 hp
Available from: 2017-07-13 Created: 2017-07-13 Last updated: 2022-10-07

Open Access in DiVA

No full text in DiVA

Search outside of DiVA

GoogleGoogle Scholar

urn-nbn

Altmetric score

urn-nbn
Total: 307 hits
CiteExportLink to record
Permanent link

Direct link
Cite
Citation style
  • apa
  • ieee
  • modern-language-association-8th-edition
  • vancouver
  • apa.csl
  • Other style
More styles
Language
  • de-DE
  • en-GB
  • en-US
  • fi-FI
  • nn-NO
  • nn-NB
  • sv-SE
  • Other locale
More languages
Output format
  • html
  • text
  • asciidoc
  • rtf