Change search
CiteExportLink to record
Permanent link

Direct link
Cite
Citation style
  • apa
  • harvard1
  • ieee
  • modern-language-association-8th-edition
  • vancouver
  • Other style
More styles
Language
  • de-DE
  • en-GB
  • en-US
  • fi-FI
  • nn-NO
  • nn-NB
  • sv-SE
  • Other locale
More languages
Output format
  • html
  • text
  • asciidoc
  • rtf
Politikers diskurs om hållbarhet och tillväxt
2004 (Swedish)Independent thesis Basic level (degree of Bachelor)Student thesis
Abstract [en]

This c-composition dealing the Karlstadpoliticians discourse about sustainability and growth. The work began from a contribution debate about sustainability growth and justice, which four politicians from the local government administration hade written. The contribution says that the growth should be both environmental and sociable sustainable. In the public debate there are a different definitions and discourses of sustainability and growth. These unlikeness have a ground in many different factors. The question issue are: What lays the ground for the politician’s discourse of sustainable growth, in Karlstad local authority? Before the analyse was made, I interviewed the politicians and read other papers from the local authority, to clearout the discourse. When this was done, the analyses began. The discourse analyse was made along theories of economics and international politic about sustainability development. The result shows that the politicians discourse are grounded on neoclassic economic, international politic whit the discourse of sustainable development, technology optimism, state and part central aim, directions and more. Many important institutions gives the politicians incitements to the “modern” system with neoclassic economic whit a focus on growth. FN gives incitements to a changed view of society. The politicians tries to handle the situations between the modern industrially paradigm and the new discourse about environment and comprehensive view to reach a sustainable development. Perhaps this implying that we are going into another modern time? Perhaps it’s an eco-modern time? But still it is the “old” industry society priority in the politician’s act and mind who is dominating now.

Place, publisher, year, edition, pages
2004. , 30 p.
Identifiers
URN: urn:nbn:se:kau:diva-54470Local ID: MIV C-3OAI: oai:DiVA.org:kau-54470DiVA: diva2:1103198
Subject / course
Environmental Science
Available from: 2017-05-30 Created: 2017-05-30

Open Access in DiVA

No full text

Search outside of DiVA

GoogleGoogle Scholar

CiteExportLink to record
Permanent link

Direct link
Cite
Citation style
  • apa
  • harvard1
  • ieee
  • modern-language-association-8th-edition
  • vancouver
  • Other style
More styles
Language
  • de-DE
  • en-GB
  • en-US
  • fi-FI
  • nn-NO
  • nn-NB
  • sv-SE
  • Other locale
More languages
Output format
  • html
  • text
  • asciidoc
  • rtf