Planned maintenance
A system upgrade is planned for 10/12-2024, at 12:00-13:00. During this time DiVA will be unavailable.
Change search
CiteExportLink to record
Permanent link

Direct link
Cite
Citation style
  • apa
  • ieee
  • modern-language-association-8th-edition
  • vancouver
  • apa.csl
  • Other style
More styles
Language
  • de-DE
  • en-GB
  • en-US
  • fi-FI
  • nn-NO
  • nn-NB
  • sv-SE
  • Other locale
More languages
Output format
  • html
  • text
  • asciidoc
  • rtf
Typical Swedish pronunciation errors - a study of pronunciation among third year students at a Swedish upper secondary school
2004 (English)Independent thesis Basic level (degree of Bachelor)Student thesis
Abstract [en]

The purpose of this paper was to present a picture of the extent of the five most recurrent pronunciation errors made by Swedish learners of English. In addition, these errors lead to a decrease in intelligibility. The errors discussed in this paper are as follows: /v/_/w/, /j/_/dZ/, /dZ/_/j/, /z/_/s/, /tS/_/S/. In order to present this picture I conducted a survey at an upper secondary school where twenty-one third grade students were recorded while performing three different reading tasks i.e. sentences, a wordlist, and minimal pairs. The results of this survey show that the students tend to replace unfamiliar phonemes by familiar phonemes. However, in contrast, the familiar phoneme /v/ tended to be replaced by the unfamiliar phoneme /w/, a tendency probably due to hypercorrection. Furthermore, the extremely high error frequency for the substitution of /s/ for /z/ might be regarded as a fossilised familiar substitution. Moreover, /S/, /dZ/, and /v/ had an error frequency around 30% and /tS/ 48%. Thus, the typical Swedish pronunciation errors surveyed in this paper occurred quite frequently among the subjects. In conclusion, the results of this survey point at the importance of negative feedback which is necessary in order to make the students aware of their mispronunciations. Consequently, the results bring the role of the teacher into focus and, hence, some questions arise: Do native Swedish teachers give feedback on these phonemic distinctions? Are teachers actually aware of these phonemic distinctions themselves and if they are, do they consider them important to master, and if so, how important?

Place, publisher, year, edition, pages
2004. , p. 28
Identifiers
URN: urn:nbn:se:kau:diva-53757Local ID: ENG C-16OAI: oai:DiVA.org:kau-53757DiVA, id: diva2:1102317
Subject / course
English
Available from: 2017-05-29 Created: 2017-05-29

Open Access in DiVA

No full text in DiVA

Search outside of DiVA

GoogleGoogle Scholar

urn-nbn

Altmetric score

urn-nbn
Total: 193 hits
CiteExportLink to record
Permanent link

Direct link
Cite
Citation style
  • apa
  • ieee
  • modern-language-association-8th-edition
  • vancouver
  • apa.csl
  • Other style
More styles
Language
  • de-DE
  • en-GB
  • en-US
  • fi-FI
  • nn-NO
  • nn-NB
  • sv-SE
  • Other locale
More languages
Output format
  • html
  • text
  • asciidoc
  • rtf