Ändra sökning
RefereraExporteraLänk till posten
Permanent länk

Direktlänk
Referera
Referensformat
  • apa
  • ieee
  • modern-language-association-8th-edition
  • vancouver
  • apa.csl
  • Annat format
Fler format
Språk
  • de-DE
  • en-GB
  • en-US
  • fi-FI
  • nn-NO
  • nn-NB
  • sv-SE
  • Annat språk
Fler språk
Utmatningsformat
  • html
  • text
  • asciidoc
  • rtf
Election campaign agendas, government partisanship, and the welfare state
Karlstads universitet, Fakulteten för humaniora och samhällsvetenskap (from 2013), Handelshögskolan.ORCID-id: 0000-0002-7143-8793
University of Gothenburg; Norway.
2017 (Engelska)Ingår i: European Political Science Review, ISSN 1755-7739, E-ISSN 1755-7747, Vol. 9, nr 2, s. 183-208Artikel i tidskrift (Refereegranskat) Published
Resurstyp
Text
Abstract [en]

Although theoretically contentious, most empirical studies contend that electoral-political factors structure the welfare state. In practice, most studies concentrate on ‘government partisanship’, that is the ideological character of the government. We agree that politics matters but also seek to expand our understanding of what ‘politics’ should be taken to mean. Drawing on recent comparative research on agenda-setting, we study the impact of whether welfare state issues were broadly salient in the public sphere during the election campaign that produced the government. We formulate hypotheses about how such systemic campaign salience and government partisanship (separately and interactively) affect welfare generosity. We also consider how such effects might have changed, taking into account challenges to standard assumptions of representative democracy coming from the ‘new politics of the welfare state’ framework. We combine well-known, but updated, data on welfare state generosity and government partisanship, with original contextual data on campaign salience from 16 West European countries for the years 1980–2008. We find that campaigns matter but also that their impact has changed. During the first half of the examined period (the 1980s and early 1990s), it mainly served to facilitate government partisanship effects on the welfare state. More recently, big-time campaign attention to welfare state issues results in some retrenchment (almost) regardless of who forms the postelection government. This raises concerns about the democratic status of the politics of welfare state reform in Europe.

Ort, förlag, år, upplaga, sidor
Cambridge University Press, 2017. Vol. 9, nr 2, s. 183-208
Nyckelord [en]
welfare state; political parties; election campaigns; agenda setting
Nationell ämneskategori
Statsvetenskap
Forskningsämne
Statsvetenskap
Identifikatorer
URN: urn:nbn:se:kau:diva-42346DOI: 10.1017/S175577391500034XISI: 000399408000002Scopus ID: 2-s2.0-84943302561OAI: oai:DiVA.org:kau-42346DiVA, id: diva2:933889
Tillgänglig från: 2016-06-07 Skapad: 2016-05-23 Senast uppdaterad: 2018-06-04Bibliografiskt granskad

Open Access i DiVA

Fulltext saknas i DiVA

Övriga länkar

Förlagets fulltextScopus

Person

Jakobsson, Niklas

Sök vidare i DiVA

Av författaren/redaktören
Jakobsson, Niklas
Av organisationen
Handelshögskolan
I samma tidskrift
European Political Science Review
Statsvetenskap

Sök vidare utanför DiVA

GoogleGoogle Scholar

doi
urn-nbn

Altmetricpoäng

doi
urn-nbn
Totalt: 238 träffar
RefereraExporteraLänk till posten
Permanent länk

Direktlänk
Referera
Referensformat
  • apa
  • ieee
  • modern-language-association-8th-edition
  • vancouver
  • apa.csl
  • Annat format
Fler format
Språk
  • de-DE
  • en-GB
  • en-US
  • fi-FI
  • nn-NO
  • nn-NB
  • sv-SE
  • Annat språk
Fler språk
Utmatningsformat
  • html
  • text
  • asciidoc
  • rtf