Change search
CiteExportLink to record
Permanent link

Direct link
Cite
Citation style
  • apa
  • harvard1
  • ieee
  • modern-language-association-8th-edition
  • vancouver
  • Other style
More styles
Language
  • de-DE
  • en-GB
  • en-US
  • fi-FI
  • nn-NO
  • nn-NB
  • sv-SE
  • Other locale
More languages
Output format
  • html
  • text
  • asciidoc
  • rtf
Transforming European Water Governance?: Participation and River Basin Management under the EU Water Framework Directive in 13 Member States
Univ Luneburg, Res Grp Governance Participat & Sustainabil, D-21335 Luneburg, Germany..
Univ Luneburg, Res Grp Governance Participat & Sustainabil, D-21335 Luneburg, Germany..
Univ Luneburg, Res Grp Governance Participat & Sustainabil, D-21335 Luneburg, Germany..
Univ Luneburg, Res Grp Governance Participat & Sustainabil, D-21335 Luneburg, Germany..
Show others and affiliations
2016 (English)In: Water, ISSN 2073-4441, E-ISSN 2073-4441, Vol. 8, no 4, 156Article in journal (Refereed) Published
Resource type
Text
Abstract [en]

The European Union (EU) Water Framework Directive (WFD) requires EU member states to produce and implement river basin management plans, which are to be designed and updated via participatory processes that inform, consult with, and actively involve all interested stakeholders. The assumption of the European Commission is that stakeholder participation, and institutional adaptation and procedural innovation to facilitate it, are essential to the effectiveness of river basin planning and, ultimately, the environmental impact of the Directive. We analyzed official documents and the WFD literature to compare implementation of the Directive in EU member states in the initial WFD planning phase (2000-2009). Examining the development of participatory approaches to river basin management planning, we consider the extent of transformation in EU water governance over the period. Employing a mixed quantitative and qualitative approach, we map the implementation "trajectories" of 13 member states, and then provide a detailed examination of shifts in river basin planning and participation in four member states (Germany, Sweden, Poland and France) to illustrate the diversity of institutional approaches observed. We identify a general tendency towards increased, yet circumscribed, stakeholder participation in river basin management in the member states examined, alongside clear continuities in terms of their respective pre-WFD institutional and procedural arrangements. Overall, the WFD has driven a highly uneven shift to river basin-level planning among the member states, and instigated a range of efforts to institutionalize stakeholder involvement-often through the establishment of advisory groups to bring organized stakeholders into the planning process.

Place, publisher, year, edition, pages
2016. Vol. 8, no 4, 156
Keyword [en]
river basin management, participation, stakeholder engagement, integrated water resources management, institutional adaptation, mandated participatory planning
National Category
Earth and Related Environmental Sciences
Research subject
Environmental Science
Identifiers
URN: urn:nbn:se:kau:diva-42613DOI: 10.3390/w8040156ISI: 000375157200047OAI: oai:DiVA.org:kau-42613DiVA: diva2:933174
Available from: 2016-06-03 Created: 2016-06-03 Last updated: 2017-10-31Bibliographically approved

Open Access in DiVA

No full text

Other links

Publisher's full texthttp://www.mdpi.com/2073-4441/8/4/156

Search in DiVA

By author/editor
Evers, MarieleHedelin, Beatrice
By organisation
Centre for Climate and Safety
In the same journal
Water
Earth and Related Environmental Sciences

Search outside of DiVA

GoogleGoogle Scholar

Altmetric score

Total: 121 hits
CiteExportLink to record
Permanent link

Direct link
Cite
Citation style
  • apa
  • harvard1
  • ieee
  • modern-language-association-8th-edition
  • vancouver
  • Other style
More styles
Language
  • de-DE
  • en-GB
  • en-US
  • fi-FI
  • nn-NO
  • nn-NB
  • sv-SE
  • Other locale
More languages
Output format
  • html
  • text
  • asciidoc
  • rtf