Endre søk
RefereraExporteraLink to record
Permanent link

Direct link
Referera
Referensformat
  • apa
  • ieee
  • modern-language-association-8th-edition
  • vancouver
  • Annet format
Fler format
Språk
  • de-DE
  • en-GB
  • en-US
  • fi-FI
  • nn-NO
  • nn-NB
  • sv-SE
  • Annet språk
Fler språk
Utmatningsformat
  • html
  • text
  • asciidoc
  • rtf
HPLC vs UHPLC - a comparison of peak asymmetry and plan to step forward using Quality by Design (QbD) related to analytical methods
Karlstads universitet, Fakulteten för teknik- och naturvetenskap, Avdelningen för kemi och biomedicinsk vetenskap.ORCID-id: 0000-0002-7123-2066
Karlstads universitet, Fakulteten för teknik- och naturvetenskap, Avdelningen för kemi och biomedicinsk vetenskap.
Astrazeneca.
2012 (engelsk)Konferansepaper, Poster (with or without abstract) (Fagfellevurdert)
Abstract [en]

The purpose of this study is to demonstrate, with experiments and with computer simulations based on a firm chromatographic theory, that the wide spread perception of that the United States Pharmacopeia tailing factor must be lower than 2 (Tf < 2) is questionable when using the latest generation of LC equipment. It is shown that highly efficient LC separations like those obtained with sub-2 m porous and 2.7 m superficially porous particles (UHPLC) produce significantly higher Tf-values than the corresponding separation based on 3 m porous particles (HPLC) when the same amount of sample is injected. Still UHPLC separations provide a better resolution to adjacent peaks. Expressions have been derived that describe how the Tf-value changes with particle size or number of theoretical plates. Expressions have also been derived that can be used to scale the injection volume based on particle size or number of theoretical plates to maintain the Tf-value when translating a HPLC separation to the corresponding UHPLC separation. This aspect has been ignored in previous publications. Finally, data obtained from columns with different age/condition indicate that Tf-values should be complemented by a peak width measure to provide a more objective quality measure. A plan to take a further step for using Quality by Design (QbD) related to analytical methods will also be presented [Ref 1]. Continuous improvement of an original HPLC method to an UHPLC method will be the used as a case study. The capability of the two methods will be deeply studied using mechanistic comparisons. Method criteria that must be fulfilled for the two chromatographic methods will be stated. [1] 2012 PDA Europe Workshop Quality by Design The Role of Analytical Science in Implementing QbD − Technical and Regulatory Aspects, Liverpool UK 6-7 March. This is an industrial – academic cooperation in the Fundamental Separation S

sted, utgiver, år, opplag, sider
2012.
HSV kategori
Identifikatorer
URN: urn:nbn:se:kau:diva-15261OAI: oai:DiVA.org:kau-15261DiVA, id: diva2:562044
Konferanse
21st Analysdagarna (Analytical days. Uppsala, Swden, June 11-13 2012.
Tilgjengelig fra: 2012-10-23 Laget: 2012-10-23 Sist oppdatert: 2019-07-12bibliografisk kontrollert

Open Access i DiVA

Fulltekst mangler i DiVA

Personposter BETA

Fornstedt, TorgnyForssén, Patrik

Søk i DiVA

Av forfatter/redaktør
Fornstedt, TorgnyForssén, Patrik
Av organisasjonen

Søk utenfor DiVA

GoogleGoogle Scholar

urn-nbn

Altmetric

urn-nbn
Totalt: 116 treff
RefereraExporteraLink to record
Permanent link

Direct link
Referera
Referensformat
  • apa
  • ieee
  • modern-language-association-8th-edition
  • vancouver
  • Annet format
Fler format
Språk
  • de-DE
  • en-GB
  • en-US
  • fi-FI
  • nn-NO
  • nn-NB
  • sv-SE
  • Annet språk
Fler språk
Utmatningsformat
  • html
  • text
  • asciidoc
  • rtf