Change search
CiteExportLink to record
Permanent link

Direct link
Cite
Citation style
  • apa
  • ieee
  • modern-language-association-8th-edition
  • vancouver
  • Other style
More styles
Language
  • de-DE
  • en-GB
  • en-US
  • fi-FI
  • nn-NO
  • nn-NB
  • sv-SE
  • Other locale
More languages
Output format
  • html
  • text
  • asciidoc
  • rtf
Psykoterapins "g-faktor": Sammanfattning av aktuell forskning
Karlstad University, Faculty of Economic Sciences, Communication and IT, Department of Psychology. Landstinget i Värmland.
Karlstad University, Faculty of Social and Life Sciences, FoU Välfärd Värmland. Karlstad University, Faculty of Economic Sciences, Communication and IT, Department of Psychology.
Karlstad University, Faculty of Economic Sciences, Communication and IT, Department of Psychology. Landstinget i Värmland.ORCID iD: 0000-0002-3560-0394
2009 (Swedish)In: Läkartidningen, ISSN 0023-7205, E-ISSN 1652-7518, Vol. 106, no 37, p. 2285-2288Article in journal (Refereed) Published
Abstract [sv]

Flera studier har visat att variationen i behandlingsresultat för olika psykoterapeuter inom samma terapimetod är betydligt större än variationen mellan olika terapimetoder.Mycket talar för att psyko terapeutisk behandling rymmer en metodövergripande »g-faktor« som snarare hör ihop med psykoterapeuten än med metoden.Det finns väsentliga luckor i kunskapen om interaktions effekter mellan psykoterapi metod, psykoterapeut, patientkaraktäristika, behandlingsrelation och kontext.Man bör vara uppmärksam på risken för ensidighet i implementering av enskilda psykoterapeutiska metoder på bred front inom hälso- och sjukvården.The American Psychological Associations Presidential Task Force on Evidence-Based Practice articulates a decision-making process based on the integration of the best available research, clinical expertise and patient characteristics. The treatment method, the individual psychotherapist, the treatment relationship and the patient are all vital contributors to a successful psychotherapy. Several studies have shown that the variation in treatment effect among psychotherapists using the same method is greater than the variation among different methods. This outcome pleads for a comprehensive psychotherapist-related g-factor of psychotherapy. In terms of decision-making for healthcare institutions and clinical practice, it would seem wise not to separate the psychotherapist, the patient or the relationship from the method as there seem to be extensive effects from interaction among these parameters. Parallel to a growing knowledge of evidence-based methods, there is still a decisive lack of scientific knowledge about these interactions

Place, publisher, year, edition, pages
Stockholm: Läkartidningen Förlag AB , 2009. Vol. 106, no 37, p. 2285-2288
Keywords [sv]
Psykoterapi - Behandlingseffekter - Psykisk hälsa
National Category
Psychology
Research subject
Psychology
Identifiers
URN: urn:nbn:se:kau:diva-11144OAI: oai:DiVA.org:kau-11144DiVA, id: diva2:494713
Available from: 2012-02-08 Created: 2012-02-08 Last updated: 2017-12-07Bibliographically approved

Open Access in DiVA

No full text in DiVA

Other links

http://ww2.lakartidningen.se/store/articlepdf/1/12671/LKT0937s2285_2288.pdf

Authority records BETA

Lindgren, OlaFolkesson, PerAlmqvist, Kjerstin

Search in DiVA

By author/editor
Lindgren, OlaFolkesson, PerAlmqvist, Kjerstin
By organisation
Department of PsychologyFoU Välfärd Värmland
In the same journal
Läkartidningen
Psychology

Search outside of DiVA

GoogleGoogle Scholar

urn-nbn

Altmetric score

urn-nbn
Total: 409 hits
CiteExportLink to record
Permanent link

Direct link
Cite
Citation style
  • apa
  • ieee
  • modern-language-association-8th-edition
  • vancouver
  • Other style
More styles
Language
  • de-DE
  • en-GB
  • en-US
  • fi-FI
  • nn-NO
  • nn-NB
  • sv-SE
  • Other locale
More languages
Output format
  • html
  • text
  • asciidoc
  • rtf