Change search
CiteExportLink to record
Permanent link

Direct link
Cite
Citation style
  • apa
  • harvard1
  • ieee
  • modern-language-association-8th-edition
  • vancouver
  • Other style
More styles
Language
  • de-DE
  • en-GB
  • en-US
  • fi-FI
  • nn-NO
  • nn-NB
  • sv-SE
  • Other locale
More languages
Output format
  • html
  • text
  • asciidoc
  • rtf
(forgive us,o life!the sin of Death: A Critical Reading of Michael Riffaterre's Semiotics of Poetry
Karlstad University, Faculty of Arts and Education, Department of Culture and Gender studies.ORCID iD: 0000-0002-2400-4124
2011 (English)In: Textual practice, ISSN 0950-236X, Vol. 25, no 5, p. 913-939Article in journal (Refereed) Published
Abstract [en]

The objectives of this article are two-fold: in part a presentation of Riffaterres semiotic-based analysis of poetry, and in part an examination of its problems and predicaments, using modern experimental poetry by way of example. Due to the fact that Semiotics of Poetry was introduced to the Anglo-American world at the same moment as a second wave of deconstruction was building up, Riffaterres theory was largely criticised for not adhering to new values, or ignored, despite the value of his semiotics of poetry as an analytical and pedagogical aid in the study of poetry.The problems that present themselves with respect to Riffaterres semiotics of poetry are mainly linked to his formalistic dependence on textuality, which cause him to ignore any factors other than intertextuality in the production of lyric poetry. This would suggest an appreciable limitation in the practicability of this method of gaining an overall grasp of what poetry is. In addition, I shall discuss the problems raised as a result of Riffaterres own hermeneutic practice of interpretation, thus offering a further illustration of the obstacles encountered in attempting to employ his semiotics of poetry. Finally, I shall endeavour to situate this method in a comprehensive poetic analysis, in order to demonstrate its primary practicability as a descriptive discipline

Place, publisher, year, edition, pages
2011. Vol. 25, no 5, p. 913-939
Keywords [en]
Michael Riffaterre, semiotics, interpretation, textuality, intertextuality, experimental poetry
National Category
General Literature Studies
Research subject
Comparative Literature
Identifiers
URN: urn:nbn:se:kau:diva-10550DOI: 10.1080/09502361003687811OAI: oai:DiVA.org:kau-10550DiVA, id: diva2:494093
Available from: 2012-02-08 Created: 2012-02-08 Last updated: 2017-05-29Bibliographically approved

Open Access in DiVA

fulltext(468 kB)242 downloads
File information
File name FULLTEXT01.pdfFile size 468 kBChecksum SHA-512
798b875efbad1ba7103e64fa6e3a83ff4868e7f93234c976df6e5dd0d8984ebcf97f5eb17883c82685ede992b0ba2f7ce8ada91a17cc3a6b8c4b42a826d15ac6
Type fulltextMimetype application/pdf

Other links

Publisher's full texthttp://www.tandf.co.uk/journals/RTPR

Authority records BETA

Bäckström, Per

Search in DiVA

By author/editor
Bäckström, Per
By organisation
Department of Culture and Gender studies
General Literature Studies

Search outside of DiVA

GoogleGoogle Scholar
Total: 242 downloads
The number of downloads is the sum of all downloads of full texts. It may include eg previous versions that are now no longer available

doi
urn-nbn

Altmetric score

doi
urn-nbn
Total: 340 hits
CiteExportLink to record
Permanent link

Direct link
Cite
Citation style
  • apa
  • harvard1
  • ieee
  • modern-language-association-8th-edition
  • vancouver
  • Other style
More styles
Language
  • de-DE
  • en-GB
  • en-US
  • fi-FI
  • nn-NO
  • nn-NB
  • sv-SE
  • Other locale
More languages
Output format
  • html
  • text
  • asciidoc
  • rtf