System disruptions
We are currently experiencing disruptions on the search portals due to high traffic. We are working to resolve the issue, you may temporarily encounter an error message.
Change search
CiteExportLink to record
Permanent link

Direct link
Cite
Citation style
  • apa
  • ieee
  • modern-language-association-8th-edition
  • vancouver
  • apa.csl
  • Other style
More styles
Language
  • de-DE
  • en-GB
  • en-US
  • fi-FI
  • nn-NO
  • nn-NB
  • sv-SE
  • Other locale
More languages
Output format
  • html
  • text
  • asciidoc
  • rtf
Experimental riparian forest gaps and increased sediment loads modify stream metabolic patterns and biofilm composition
Swedish University of Agricultural Sciences, Sweden.
Karlstad University, Faculty of Health, Science and Technology (starting 2013), Department of Environmental and Life Sciences (from 2013).ORCID iD: 0000-0002-3191-7140
Swedish University of Agricultural Sciences, Sweden.
2023 (English)In: Ecosphere, E-ISSN 2150-8925, Vol. 14, no 12, article id e4695Article in journal (Refereed) Published
Abstract [en]

Forest management operations greatly influence stream habitats. Canopy clearing and subsequent canopy development during succession, site preparation, and ditching alter the light environment, and increase sediment inputs and nutrient exports from upland and riparian soils to streams. These physicochemical changes affect aquatic biofilms and metabolic rates, and in this study, we tested their individual and combined effects. We used 12 artificial streamside channels, together with a field survey of nine streams in and around clear-cuts, to assess the effects of shading, substrate composition, and nutrient addition on biofilm biomass and composition, as well as metabolic rates. We found that biofilm biomass and gross primary production (GPP) were light limited in channels under 70% canopy shading. Nitrate additions at this shading level only marginally increased autotrophic biomass, while the rates of respiration increased 10-fold when carbon was added. Open (unshaded) channels had three times higher rates of GPP compared with channels with 70% shading, and autotrophic biomass was twice as high, largely caused by the colonization of filamentous green algae. These changes to biofilm biomass, composition, and GPP were caused by differences in light alone, as temperature was not affected by the shading treatment. Notably, higher rates of GPP led to no positive effect on net ecosystem production. Further, fine-grained substrates negatively affected GPP as compared with stone substrates in the experimental channels. In the surveyed streams, the negative effects of fine-grained substrates exceeded the positive influence of light on biofilm biomass. Altogether, our results highlight the need for riparian management that protects headwaters from unwanted stressors by focusing on preventing sediment erosion and carbon transport in clear-cuts, while providing variable shade conditions in second-growth forests. 

Place, publisher, year, edition, pages
John Wiley & Sons, 2023. Vol. 14, no 12, article id e4695
Keywords [en]
biofilm, buffer, chla, clear-cut, forestry, gross primary production, metabolism, respiration, riparian forest, sediment, shading, stream
National Category
Ecology Environmental Sciences
Research subject
Biology
Identifiers
URN: urn:nbn:se:kau:diva-97907DOI: 10.1002/ecs2.4695ISI: 001126533100001Scopus ID: 2-s2.0-85179670522OAI: oai:DiVA.org:kau-97907DiVA, id: diva2:1823883
Funder
WWF Sweden, 300326Swedish Research Council Formas, 2019‐01108Available from: 2024-01-03 Created: 2024-01-03 Last updated: 2024-01-05Bibliographically approved

Open Access in DiVA

fulltext(1541 kB)127 downloads
File information
File name FULLTEXT01.pdfFile size 1541 kBChecksum SHA-512
794afae5f150af96de11f249ef00d472f6f80aa150f9401cd734348069dc275fbea3a17d2e47304e4e7ed14b1471a7419388660763e9233f6122d6f95e22f62c
Type fulltextMimetype application/pdf

Other links

Publisher's full textScopus

Authority records

Greenberg, Larry

Search in DiVA

By author/editor
Greenberg, Larry
By organisation
Department of Environmental and Life Sciences (from 2013)
In the same journal
Ecosphere
EcologyEnvironmental Sciences

Search outside of DiVA

GoogleGoogle Scholar
Total: 128 downloads
The number of downloads is the sum of all downloads of full texts. It may include eg previous versions that are now no longer available

doi
urn-nbn

Altmetric score

doi
urn-nbn
Total: 153 hits
CiteExportLink to record
Permanent link

Direct link
Cite
Citation style
  • apa
  • ieee
  • modern-language-association-8th-edition
  • vancouver
  • apa.csl
  • Other style
More styles
Language
  • de-DE
  • en-GB
  • en-US
  • fi-FI
  • nn-NO
  • nn-NB
  • sv-SE
  • Other locale
More languages
Output format
  • html
  • text
  • asciidoc
  • rtf