Change search
CiteExportLink to record
Permanent link

Direct link
Cite
Citation style
  • apa
  • ieee
  • modern-language-association-8th-edition
  • vancouver
  • apa.csl
  • Other style
More styles
Language
  • de-DE
  • en-GB
  • en-US
  • fi-FI
  • nn-NO
  • nn-NB
  • sv-SE
  • Other locale
More languages
Output format
  • html
  • text
  • asciidoc
  • rtf
AI ≥ Journalism: How the Chinese Copyright Law Protects Tech Giants' AI Innovations and Disrupts the Journalistic Institution
Karlstad University, Faculty of Arts and Social Sciences (starting 2013), Department of Geography, Media and Communication (from 2013).ORCID iD: 0000-0002-0920-8153
Karlstad University, Faculty of Arts and Social Sciences (starting 2013), Department of Geography, Media and Communication (from 2013). University of Stavanger, NOR.ORCID iD: 0000-0002-0501-2217
Karlstad University, Faculty of Arts and Social Sciences (starting 2013), Department of Geography, Media and Communication (from 2013).ORCID iD: 0000-0003-4286-7764
2022 (English)In: Digital Journalism, ISSN 2167-0811, E-ISSN 2167-082X, Vol. 10, no 10, p. 1893-1912Article in journal (Refereed) Published
Abstract [en]

Journalism and other institutions clash over automated news generation, algorithmic distribution and content ownership worldwide. AI policies are the main mechanisms that establish and organise the hierarchies among these institutions. Few studies, however, have explored the normative dimension of AI in policymaking in journalism, especially beyond the West. This case study inspects the copyright law's impact on AI innovation in newsrooms in the unexamined Chinese context. Using neo-institutional theory and policy network theory, the study investigates the Third Amendment to the Chinese Copyright Law, exemplary court cases regarding automated journalism copyright disputes (such as Tencent v. Yingxun and Film v. Baidu), and other supporting documents. The findings show how China's copyright legal framework separates authorship and ownership; defines "originality" and "creativity" in human-machine collaboration; and prioritises tech companies while undermining journalistic autonomy. We argue that the law's eager embrace of AI may give tech companies an advantage over news organisations that do not necessarily have a strategy to adopt AI. Moreover, it favours state-owned, resource-rich official media over the private sector. An implication of this shifting power dynamic is the possibility of privately owned news media being marginalised, resulting in even stronger state control over media production and information flow.

Place, publisher, year, edition, pages
Taylor & Francis, 2022. Vol. 10, no 10, p. 1893-1912
Keywords [en]
Artificial intelligence, automated news, China, copyright law, institutional theory, journalism, media innovation, policy network
National Category
Media and Communication Studies
Research subject
Media and Communication Studies
Identifiers
URN: urn:nbn:se:kau:diva-92239DOI: 10.1080/21670811.2022.2120032ISI: 000861260300001Scopus ID: 2-s2.0-85139110629OAI: oai:DiVA.org:kau-92239DiVA, id: diva2:1705099
Available from: 2022-10-20 Created: 2022-10-20 Last updated: 2025-04-14Bibliographically approved
In thesis
1. AI, News, and the State: Reinstitutionalising Journalism in Global China’s Algorithmic Age
Open this publication in new window or tab >>AI, News, and the State: Reinstitutionalising Journalism in Global China’s Algorithmic Age
2025 (English)Doctoral thesis, comprehensive summary (Other academic)
Abstract [en]

This dissertation investigates the evolving relationship between journalism and artificial intelligence (AI), focusing on the case of China within a broader global context. Drawing on a critical interpretivist and neo-institutionalist approach, the study explores how AI technologies are transforming journalistic roles, practices, organisational structures, and governance systems. The research conceptualises AI not merely as a set of tools but as a sociotechnical phenomenon that reshapes power relations among key institutional actors—news organisations, technology companies, and the state.

The study employs a multi-method, multi-level research design across five interlinked articles. At the micro level, it examines how Chinese journalists perceive and adapt to AI, and how these perceptions are reflected in their professional role and reporting practices. At the meso level, it analyses the platformisation of news and how algorithmic distribution systems—particularly those developed by major Chinese tech firms—restructure the economic and institutional foundations of journalism. At the macro level, it interrogates the legal and regulatory frameworks governing AI and journalism, comparing developments in China with those in the US and EU to understand cross-national institutional dynamics and normative shifts.

The research highlights a trajectory from institutional adaptability to reinstitutionalisation, showing how the traditional norms of journalism are reconfigured by both market-driven platform logic and state-led political imperatives. The Chinese case, while shaped by its unique media system and historical entanglements, offers insight into broader global tensions between technological innovation, media autonomy, and institutional control. By integrating journalism studies, science and technology studies (STS), political economy, and legal analysis, this dissertation contributes to a transdisciplinary understanding of AI’s impact on the future of journalism.

Abstract [en]

AI, News, and the State: Reinstitutionalising Journalism in Global China’s Algorithmic Age explores global power shifts and institutional struggles arising from AI’s integration into news production and distribution, with a focus on China and comparative insights from the US and EU. Bridging journalism studies, science and technology studies (STS), political economy, and legal analysis, this dissertation examines how AI is embedded in journalistic practices, media governance, and legal frameworks across divergent political systems. Adopting a critical political economy perspective, the work investigates how AI reconfigures power dynamics between media actors, tech firms, and the state. Focusing on journalism labour, media texts, platformisation, and copyright regimes, it analyses the adaptation of journalists to AI tools and the global race to govern generative technologies. This study provides a multi-level critique of journalism’s reinstitutionalisation under algorithmic conditions, shedding light on its implications for editorial autonomy, democratic values, and public accountability. It provides critical insights for scholars, practitioners, and policymakers seeking to understand the intersections of media, technology, and power in the algorithmic age.

Place, publisher, year, edition, pages
Karlstad: Karlstads universitet, 2025. p. 140
Series
Karlstad University Studies, ISSN 1403-8099 ; 2025:21
Keywords
algorithmic governance, algorithms, artificial intelligence (AI), comparative media studies, copyright law, critical political economy, digital platforms, institutional theory, journalism innovation, journalistic autonomy, law and policy, media governance, platformisation, science and technology studies (STS), sociotechnical systems
National Category
Media and Communication Studies
Research subject
Media and Communication Studies
Identifiers
urn:nbn:se:kau:diva-103985 (URN)10.59217/vtdx3630 (DOI)978-91-7867-574-6 (ISBN)978-91-7867-575-3 (ISBN)
Public defence
2025-05-30, 11D121, Andersalen, Universitetsgatan 2, Karlstad, 13:00 (English)
Opponent
Supervisors
Available from: 2025-05-07 Created: 2025-04-14 Last updated: 2025-05-09Bibliographically approved

Open Access in DiVA

fulltext(2018 kB)1831 downloads
File information
File name FULLTEXT02.pdfFile size 2018 kBChecksum SHA-512
3d46553bc67bf6b7a002dea47eb0c64123a3f2ee6e9eda66e592b74bc4e8dc2aff8d812e37b7b6eff6ac31fc9a6a7dc51461be902050fbed4884c9f457802d5b
Type fulltextMimetype application/pdf

Other links

Publisher's full textScopus

Authority records

Kuai, JoanneFerrer Conill, RaulKarlsson, Michael

Search in DiVA

By author/editor
Kuai, JoanneFerrer Conill, RaulKarlsson, Michael
By organisation
Department of Geography, Media and Communication (from 2013)
In the same journal
Digital Journalism
Media and Communication Studies

Search outside of DiVA

GoogleGoogle Scholar
Total: 1857 downloads
The number of downloads is the sum of all downloads of full texts. It may include eg previous versions that are now no longer available

doi
urn-nbn

Altmetric score

doi
urn-nbn
Total: 1800 hits
CiteExportLink to record
Permanent link

Direct link
Cite
Citation style
  • apa
  • ieee
  • modern-language-association-8th-edition
  • vancouver
  • apa.csl
  • Other style
More styles
Language
  • de-DE
  • en-GB
  • en-US
  • fi-FI
  • nn-NO
  • nn-NB
  • sv-SE
  • Other locale
More languages
Output format
  • html
  • text
  • asciidoc
  • rtf