Change search
CiteExportLink to record
Permanent link

Direct link
Cite
Citation style
  • apa
  • ieee
  • modern-language-association-8th-edition
  • vancouver
  • apa.csl
  • Other style
More styles
Language
  • de-DE
  • en-GB
  • en-US
  • fi-FI
  • nn-NO
  • nn-NB
  • sv-SE
  • Other locale
More languages
Output format
  • html
  • text
  • asciidoc
  • rtf
Adverse events in women giving birth in a labor ward: a retrospective record review study
Karlstad University, Faculty of Health, Science and Technology (starting 2013), Department of Health Sciences (from 2013).ORCID iD: 0000-0002-0756-8833
Karlstad University, Faculty of Health, Science and Technology (starting 2013), Department of Health Sciences (from 2013). Norwegian University of Science & Technology, NOR.ORCID iD: 0000-0003-3385-3731
Karlstad University, Faculty of Health, Science and Technology (starting 2013), Department of Health Sciences (from 2013). Ostfold University College, NOR.ORCID iD: 0000-0002-9608-336X
Karlstad University, Faculty of Health, Science and Technology (starting 2013), Department of Health Sciences (from 2013).ORCID iD: 0000-0003-1382-4386
2021 (English)In: BMC Health Services Research, E-ISSN 1472-6963, Vol. 21, no 1, article id 1093Article, review/survey (Refereed) Published
Abstract [en]

Background Childbirth could negatively affect the woman's health through adverse events. To prevent adverse events and increase patient safety it is important to detect and learn from them. The aim of the study was to describe adverse events, including the preventability and severity of harm during planned vaginal births, in women giving birth in the labor ward. Methods The study had a descriptive design with a retrospective birth record review to assess the preventability of adverse events using the Swedish version of the Global Trigger Tool. The setting was a labor ward in Sweden with low-risk and risk childbirths. Descriptive statistics, Pearson's Chi-square test and Student's t-test were used. Results A total of 38 adverse events (12.2%) were identified in 311 reviewed birth records. Of these, 28 (73.7%) were assessed as preventable. Third- or fourth-degree lacerations and distended urinary bladder were most prevalent together with anesthesia-related adverse events. The majority of the adverse events were classified into the harm categories of 'prolonged hospital care' (63.2%) and 'temporary harm' (31.6%). No permanent harm were identified, but over two-thirds of the adverse events were assessed as preventable. Conclusions This first study using Global Trigger Tool in a labor ward in Sweden identified a higher incidence of adverse events than previous studies in obstetric care. No permanent patient harm was found, but over two-thirds of the adverse events were assessed as preventable. The results draw particular attention to 3(rd)-or 4(th)-degree lacerations, distended urinary bladder and anesthesia-related adverse events. The feedback on identified adverse events should be used for systematic quality improvement and clinical recommendations how to prevent adverse events must be implemented.

Place, publisher, year, edition, pages
BioMed Central, 2021. Vol. 21, no 1, article id 1093
Keywords [en]
Adverse events, Childbirth, Global trigger tool, Harm, Labor, Obstetric care, Patient safety, Record review
National Category
Nursing
Research subject
Nursing Science
Identifiers
URN: urn:nbn:se:kau:diva-87283DOI: 10.1186/s12913-021-07109-5ISI: 000707340900002PubMedID: 34649538Scopus ID: 2-s2.0-85117335020OAI: oai:DiVA.org:kau-87283DiVA, id: diva2:1613319
Available from: 2021-11-22 Created: 2021-11-22 Last updated: 2022-09-15Bibliographically approved
In thesis
1. Patient safety in intrapartum care: Adverse events and healthcare professionals’ perceptions of patient safety, patient safety culture and teamwork
Open this publication in new window or tab >>Patient safety in intrapartum care: Adverse events and healthcare professionals’ perceptions of patient safety, patient safety culture and teamwork
2022 (English)Doctoral thesis, comprehensive summary (Other academic)
Abstract [en]

The overall aim of the thesis was to describe adverse events for women with planned vaginal births and healthcare professionals’ perceptions of patient safety. Further, to test the reliability and validity of a teamwork questionnaire and to investigate patient safety culture and teamwork among healthcare professionals in intrapartum care.

Methods: Paper I had a retrospective design, with 311 birth record reviews. Paper II had a descriptive and qualitative design using a phenomenographic approach, including interviews with 19 healthcare professionals in three labor wards. Paper III and IV had cross-sectional designs. Healthcare professionals’ (n=450) in various wards responded to the TeamSTEPPS® Teamwork Perceptions Questionnaire (T-TPQ) (III). Healthcare professionals’ (n=184) in three labor wards responded to the Swedish version of the Hospital Survey on Patient Safety Culture and the T-TPQ (IV). Confirmatory factor analysis and descriptive and inferential statistics were used.

Main results: Adverse events in women occurred in 11% of planned vaginal births (I). Four descriptive categories with nine perceptions described patient safety for women giving birth (II). Confirmatory factor analysis of the T-TPQ indicated a good fit (III). Main and interaction effects of profession and labor ward on patient safety culture and teamwork were found (IV).

Conclusions: The results highlight the occurrence of 3rd- or 4th-degree lacerations, distended urinary bladder, and anesthesia-related adverse events. For safe care, it is crucial for healthcare professionals to provide supportive care and to listen to the woman. Using team members’ competences in a tolerant atmosphere, with a reasonable workload, and learning from failure as well as from success are preconditions for patient safety. The Swedish version of the T-TPQ shows acceptable reliability and validity. Differences between labor wards seemed to have a greater impact than differences between professions on patient safety culture and teamwork.

Abstract [en]

Patient safety is a global health priority. Knowledge about patient safety and adverse events for women giving birth is necessary. Patient safety culture and effective teamwork are important for safe care provided by midwives, physicians and nursing assistants. The overall aim of the thesis was to describe adverse events for women with planned vaginal births and healthcare professionals’ perceptions of patient safety. Further, to test the reliability and validity of a teamwork questionnaire and to investigate patient safety culture and teamwork among healthcare professionals in intrapartum care. A birth record review, interviews and two questionnaires were used. Adverse events were identified in 11% of the birth records, but no permanent harm. Listening to the woman and having a tolerant teamwork atmosphere were important. Both profession and labor ward are important for healthcare professionals’ perceptions of patient safety culture and teamwork in intrapartum care.

Place, publisher, year, edition, pages
Karlstad: Karlstads universitet, 2022. p. 82
Series
Karlstad University Studies, ISSN 1403-8099 ; 2022:6
Keywords
adverse events, construct validity, healthcare professionals’ perceptions, interviews, intrapartum care, questionnaire, patient safety, patient safety culture, record review, reliability, teamwork, women giving birth
National Category
Health Sciences
Research subject
Nursing Science
Identifiers
urn:nbn:se:kau:diva-89110 (URN)978-91-7867-269-1 (ISBN)978-91-7867-279-0 (ISBN)
Public defence
2022-06-03, 1B364 Frödingsalen, Universitetsgatan 2, Karlstad, 10:00 (Swedish)
Opponent
Supervisors
Note

Article 4 which was included in the thesis as a manuscript is now published. 

Available from: 2022-05-03 Created: 2022-03-16 Last updated: 2022-09-15Bibliographically approved

Open Access in DiVA

fulltext(456 kB)220 downloads
File information
File name FULLTEXT01.pdfFile size 456 kBChecksum SHA-512
f9a894dd87130a400a9f75a9300e9ba28808fde76fd2b9854c7e0440f2a1a4a5aaec26c9f4deec057a1af71d9fb8842e7f231267aca00396ef6649b615196035
Type fulltextMimetype application/pdf

Other links

Publisher's full textPubMedScopus

Authority records

Skoogh, AnnikaHall-Lord, Marie LouiseBååth, CarinaSandin-Bojö, Ann-Kristin

Search in DiVA

By author/editor
Skoogh, AnnikaHall-Lord, Marie LouiseBååth, CarinaSandin-Bojö, Ann-Kristin
By organisation
Department of Health Sciences (from 2013)
In the same journal
BMC Health Services Research
Nursing

Search outside of DiVA

GoogleGoogle Scholar
Total: 220 downloads
The number of downloads is the sum of all downloads of full texts. It may include eg previous versions that are now no longer available

doi
pubmed
urn-nbn

Altmetric score

doi
pubmed
urn-nbn
Total: 139 hits
CiteExportLink to record
Permanent link

Direct link
Cite
Citation style
  • apa
  • ieee
  • modern-language-association-8th-edition
  • vancouver
  • apa.csl
  • Other style
More styles
Language
  • de-DE
  • en-GB
  • en-US
  • fi-FI
  • nn-NO
  • nn-NB
  • sv-SE
  • Other locale
More languages
Output format
  • html
  • text
  • asciidoc
  • rtf