Change search
CiteExportLink to record
Permanent link

Direct link
Cite
Citation style
  • apa
  • ieee
  • modern-language-association-8th-edition
  • vancouver
  • apa.csl
  • Other style
More styles
Language
  • de-DE
  • en-GB
  • en-US
  • fi-FI
  • nn-NO
  • nn-NB
  • sv-SE
  • Other locale
More languages
Output format
  • html
  • text
  • asciidoc
  • rtf
Inter-team Coordination in Large-Scale Agile Software Development Projects
Karlstad University, Faculty of Arts and Social Sciences (starting 2013), Karlstad Business School (from 2013). Karlstads universitet.ORCID iD: 0000-0002-1512-6592
2020 (English)Doctoral thesis, monograph (Other academic)
Abstract [en]

Software development organizations worldwide are adopting values, principles, and frameworks to implement Agile ways of working. The advantages of Agile ways of working are seen in teams that are allowed a high level of autonomy. The Agile methods were initially designed for use in small, single-team projects, and routines for coordination between several teams have not been adopted in the same way as routines for coordination within the team. With several teams coordinating, autonomy must, to some extent, be sacrificed in the individual team. Work needs to be coordinated with other teams, and a project is often part of a portfolio or program. The purpose of this research is to investigate routines for inter-team coordination: how they are performed; if, how and why they are tailored, and the impacts of these added routines in relation to Agile values and principles, in particular team autonomy.

This thesis is based on empirical studies at three organizations with disparate business logics. One is a product development department in the automotive industry, one is a business bank, and one is an IT department at a Swedish government agency. Data has been collected from 379 hours of on-site observations, 28 interviews, and 201 answers to a survey questionnaire.

Insights from these cases build on coordination theories as well as institutional logics (new institutional theory). One contribution of this thesis is the rich descriptions of tailoring of inter-team coordination routines. Another contribution is the identified perceived impacts of the implemented inter-team coordination routines, especially regarding perceived changes to team autonomy. An important theoretical contribution is the identified and defined institutional logics (Agile toolbox logic, Agile rulebook logic, Flow efficiency logic, and Resource efficiency logic), which can be used for analysis of large-scale Agile software development projects.

Abstract [en]

Software development organizations are implementing Agile values, principles, and frameworks all over the world. One important part of Agile is to allow teams to self-organize with a high level of autonomy; a strategy that has proved to be very successful. The Agile methods were initially designed for use in small, single-team projects. Routines for coordination between teams have not been adopted as much as routines for coordination within teams and have therefore not been much studied. A problem with several teams coordinating is that the autonomy must, to some extent, be sacrificed in the individual team when work needs to be coordinated with other teams, and a project is often part of a portfolio or program.

This thesis provides insights and rich descriptions of routines for inter-team coordination in large-scale Agile software development projects. How they are performed, how and why they are tailored, and the impacts of these added routines.

Empirical case studies have been performed at three large and diverse organizations: A company in the automotive industry, a business bank, and a Swedish government agency. Insights from this multiple-case study build on coordination theory as well as institutional logics (new institutional theory).

Place, publisher, year, edition, pages
Karlstad: Karlstads universitet, 2020. , p. 286
Series
Karlstad University Studies, ISSN 1403-8099 ; 2020:30
Keywords [en]
Inter-Team Coordination, Large-Scale Agile Software Development, Institutional logics, Scaled Agile Framework, Project Management
National Category
Information Systems, Social aspects
Research subject
Information Systems
Identifiers
URN: urn:nbn:se:kau:diva-80195ISBN: 978-91-7867-151-9 (print)ISBN: 978-91-7867-155-7 (print)OAI: oai:DiVA.org:kau-80195DiVA, id: diva2:1467469
Public defence
2020-12-04, Agardhsalen,11D 257, Karlstads universitet, Karlstad, 13:15 (Swedish)
Opponent
Supervisors
Available from: 2020-11-06 Created: 2020-09-15 Last updated: 2021-01-27Bibliographically approved

Open Access in DiVA

fulltext(3744 kB)2808 downloads
File information
File name FULLTEXT01.pdfFile size 3744 kBChecksum SHA-512
9103b29098c48ca2c0c81a0aa47d785b2f667644e4211fc193a72119fd8e0fa648ee07ba453f6081d383794d472028037281d7b3e1c909c25b87851cd9013c71
Type fulltextMimetype application/pdf
Forskningspodden med Tomas Gustavsson(44393 kB)234 downloads
File information
File name AUDIO01.mp3File size 44393 kBChecksum SHA-512
266d161d5d76679f5985ae20bee3afa884d75f9e9ae19c2709fa124c07f20750b0d21b81ed6870292886fd88b083c1633042cfb7dd68abe8e89648ced0fe2a87
Type audioMimetype audio/mpeg

Authority records

Gustavsson, Tomas

Search in DiVA

By author/editor
Gustavsson, Tomas
By organisation
Karlstad Business School (from 2013)
Information Systems, Social aspects

Search outside of DiVA

GoogleGoogle Scholar
Total: 2816 downloads
The number of downloads is the sum of all downloads of full texts. It may include eg previous versions that are now no longer available

isbn
urn-nbn

Altmetric score

isbn
urn-nbn
Total: 9906 hits
CiteExportLink to record
Permanent link

Direct link
Cite
Citation style
  • apa
  • ieee
  • modern-language-association-8th-edition
  • vancouver
  • apa.csl
  • Other style
More styles
Language
  • de-DE
  • en-GB
  • en-US
  • fi-FI
  • nn-NO
  • nn-NB
  • sv-SE
  • Other locale
More languages
Output format
  • html
  • text
  • asciidoc
  • rtf