Endre søk
RefereraExporteraLink to record
Permanent link

Direct link
Referera
Referensformat
  • apa
  • ieee
  • modern-language-association-8th-edition
  • vancouver
  • Annet format
Fler format
Språk
  • de-DE
  • en-GB
  • en-US
  • fi-FI
  • nn-NO
  • nn-NB
  • sv-SE
  • Annet språk
Fler språk
Utmatningsformat
  • html
  • text
  • asciidoc
  • rtf
Anthropomorphism and the Representation of Animals as Adversaries
2015 (engelsk)Inngår i: Animal Horror Cinema: Genre, History and Criticism, Palgrave Macmillan, 2015, s. 206-223Kapittel i bok, del av antologi (Annet vitenskapelig)
Abstract [en]

In his 1977 essay ‘Why Look at Animals?’ John Berger writes about the place of animals in the visual cultures of modernity and postmodernity. The actual animal has all but disappeared from human life in modernity, Berger points out. Numerous species that used to be close to us humans, including animals that are still bred for their meat and hide, have been Largely removed from the lives of the vast majority of the population of the Western world. Few people ever have to think about the animal that the meat they eat once was. The animals that people do encounter are usually not ‘wild’ animals who behave as such: pets are seen as family members and zoo animals are domesticated and some are trained to perform tricks. However, while we have all but rid the urban and suburban West of animals, we have filled the resulting void with signs that remind us of their absence — though the wild animals themselves are gone, images of animals that invade human culture proliferate. The visual aspect of human-animal relations, in other words, did not disappear with the animal, but has lived on in forms ranging from anthropomorphic renderings of animals in Beatrix Potter’s books and numerous Disney cartoons to displays of live animals at aquariums and zoos — and, of course, animal and nature films. Urban Western modernity thus seems almost to dissolve the animal ‘into pure spectral-ity’ (Burt, 2002, pp. 26–7). The animal in (post)modern visual culture is a ghostly presence that the actual wild animal leaves behind.

sted, utgiver, år, opplag, sider
Palgrave Macmillan, 2015. s. 206-223
HSV kategori
Forskningsprogram
Filmvetenskap
Identifikatorer
URN: urn:nbn:se:kau:diva-75645DOI: 10.1057/9781137496393_12ISBN: 978-1-137-49638-6 (tryckt)OAI: oai:DiVA.org:kau-75645DiVA, id: diva2:1369821
Tilgjengelig fra: 2019-11-13 Laget: 2019-11-13 Sist oppdatert: 2019-11-13bibliografisk kontrollert

Open Access i DiVA

Fulltekst mangler i DiVA

Andre lenker

Forlagets fulltekst

Personposter BETA

Hållén, Nicklas

Søk i DiVA

Av forfatter/redaktør
Hållén, Nicklas

Søk utenfor DiVA

GoogleGoogle Scholar

doi
isbn
urn-nbn

Altmetric

doi
isbn
urn-nbn
Totalt: 9 treff
RefereraExporteraLink to record
Permanent link

Direct link
Referera
Referensformat
  • apa
  • ieee
  • modern-language-association-8th-edition
  • vancouver
  • Annet format
Fler format
Språk
  • de-DE
  • en-GB
  • en-US
  • fi-FI
  • nn-NO
  • nn-NB
  • sv-SE
  • Annet språk
Fler språk
Utmatningsformat
  • html
  • text
  • asciidoc
  • rtf