1516171819202120 of 21
CiteExportLink to record
Permanent link

Direct link
Cite
Citation style
  • apa
  • harvard1
  • ieee
  • modern-language-association-8th-edition
  • vancouver
  • Other style
More styles
Language
  • de-DE
  • en-GB
  • en-US
  • fi-FI
  • nn-NO
  • nn-NB
  • sv-SE
  • Other locale
More languages
Output format
  • html
  • text
  • asciidoc
  • rtf
Experimental study of cross-laminated timber wall panels
Växjö universitet, Institutionen för teknik och design.
Växjö universitet, Institutionen för teknik och design.
Växjö universitet, Institutionen för teknik och design.
Tyréns.
2009 (English)In: European Journal of Wood and Wood Products, ISSN 0018-3768, E-ISSN 1436-736X, Vol. 67, no 2, p. 211-218Article in journal (Refereed) Published
Abstract [en]

The use of cross-laminated structural timber elementsis becoming increasingly popular. The number of layersvaries normally from three upwards. The structural performanceof five-layer cross-laminated timber elements was investigated.The five layers consisted of 19mm thick boards,laid successively at right angles to each other and gluedtogether with PU-adhesive, layers 1, 3 and 5 lying in onedirection and layers 2 and 4 in the other. The stiffness andstrength of four cross-laminated timber elements (4955mmlong, 1250mm wide and 96mm thick) were studied duringin-plane bending. Two of the elements were first partitionedinto two parts that were reconnected in two different waysprior to testing. The influence of the way in which the crosslaminatedtimber elements were reconnected was studied,the behaviour observed being compared with the test resultsfor the unpartitioned specimens with respect to both strengthand stiffness. The experimental tests performed showed thecross-laminated timber elements to possess a high degree ofstiffness and strength. There was also found to be a markeddifference in behaviour between the two different ways inwhich the elements were connected to each other. One of thetwo connecting methods studied, being of less good designbut earlier frequently used in Sweden, showed as expectedpoor structural performance, whereas the other one appliedas a safer alternative performed well.

Place, publisher, year, edition, pages
Springer, 2009. Vol. 67, no 2, p. 211-218
National Category
Building Technologies
Research subject
Technology (byts ev till Engineering), Civil engineering
Identifiers
URN: urn:nbn:se:kau:diva-74396DOI: 10.1007/s00107-009-0313-5OAI: oai:DiVA.org:kau-74396DiVA, id: diva2:1343475
Available from: 2019-08-16 Created: 2019-08-16 Last updated: 2019-08-16Bibliographically approved

Open Access in DiVA

fulltext(507 kB)15 downloads
File information
File name FULLTEXT01.pdfFile size 507 kBChecksum SHA-512
62828def2c65ce7c80cacbfe5b4e89e42f5a7a18c80e043c83aeac08c42b1894fcf636429cebd24b4c039318cf7b3f762b4ee6b88e390cc7c9236163a67d07df
Type fulltextMimetype application/pdf

Other links

Publisher's full textFulltext

Authority records BETA

Vessby, JohanEnquist, BertilPetersson, Hans

Search in DiVA

By author/editor
Vessby, JohanEnquist, BertilPetersson, Hans
In the same journal
European Journal of Wood and Wood Products
Building Technologies

Search outside of DiVA

GoogleGoogle Scholar
Total: 15 downloads
The number of downloads is the sum of all downloads of full texts. It may include eg previous versions that are now no longer available

doi
urn-nbn

Altmetric score

doi
urn-nbn
Total: 15 hits
1516171819202120 of 21
CiteExportLink to record
Permanent link

Direct link
Cite
Citation style
  • apa
  • harvard1
  • ieee
  • modern-language-association-8th-edition
  • vancouver
  • Other style
More styles
Language
  • de-DE
  • en-GB
  • en-US
  • fi-FI
  • nn-NO
  • nn-NB
  • sv-SE
  • Other locale
More languages
Output format
  • html
  • text
  • asciidoc
  • rtf