Endre søk
RefereraExporteraLink to record
Permanent link

Direct link
Referera
Referensformat
  • apa
  • ieee
  • modern-language-association-8th-edition
  • vancouver
  • apa.csl
  • Annet format
Fler format
Språk
  • de-DE
  • en-GB
  • en-US
  • fi-FI
  • nn-NO
  • nn-NB
  • sv-SE
  • Annet språk
Fler språk
Utmatningsformat
  • html
  • text
  • asciidoc
  • rtf
Prioritized Process Test: An Alternative to Current Process Testing Strategies
Czech Tech Univ, Software Testing Intelligent Lab STILL, Dept Comp Sci, Fac Elect Engn, Karlovo Nam 13, Prague 12135 2, Czech Republic. CZE.ORCID-id: 0000-0002-2994-7826
Czech Tech Univ, Software Testing Intelligent Lab STILL, Dept Comp Sci, Fac Elect Engn, Karlovo Nam 13, Prague 12135 2, Czech Republic. CZE.ORCID-id: 0000-0001-9051-7609
Univ Malaysia Pahang, IBM Ctr Excellence, Fac Comp Syst & Software Engn, Gambang, Malaysia. MYS.ORCID-id: 0000-0003-4626-0513
2019 (engelsk)Inngår i: International journal of software engineering and knowledge engineering, ISSN 0218-1940, Vol. 29, nr 7, s. 997-1028Artikkel i tidsskrift (Fagfellevurdert) Published
Abstract [en]

Testing processes and workflows in information and Internet of Things systems is a major part of the typical software testing effort. Consistent and efficient path-based test cases are desired to support these tests. Because certain parts of software system workflows have a higher business priority than others, this fact has to be involved in the generation of test cases. In this paper, we propose a Prioritized Process Test (PPT), which is a model-based test case generation algorithm that represents an alternative to currently established algorithms that use directed graphs and test requirements to model the system under test. The PPT accepts a directed multigraph as a model to express priorities, and edge weights are used instead of test requirements. To determine the test-coverage level of test cases, a test-depth-level concept is used. We compared the presented PPT with five alternatives (i.e. the Process Cycle Test (PCT), a naive reduction of test set created by the PCT, Brute Force algorithm, Set-covering-Based Solution and Matching-based Prefix Graph Solution) for edge coverage and edge-pair coverage. To assess the optimality of the path-based test cases produced by these strategies, we used 14 metrics based on the properties of these test cases and 59 models that were created for three real-world systems. For all edge coverage, the PPT produced more optimal test cases than the alternatives in terms of the majority of the metrics. For edge-pair coverage, the PPT strategy yielded similar results to those of the alternatives. Thus, the PPT strategy is an applicable alternative as it reflects both the required test coverage level and the business priority in parallel.

sted, utgiver, år, opplag, sider
World Scientific Publishing , 2019. Vol. 29, nr 7, s. 997-1028
Emneord [en]
Software testing, model-based testing, process testing, path-based testing
HSV kategori
Forskningsprogram
Datavetenskap
Identifikatorer
URN: urn:nbn:se:kau:diva-86827DOI: 10.1142/S0218194019500335ISI: 000479114500005OAI: oai:DiVA.org:kau-86827DiVA, id: diva2:1608305
Tilgjengelig fra: 2021-11-03 Laget: 2021-11-03 Sist oppdatert: 2021-11-04bibliografisk kontrollert

Open Access i DiVA

Fulltekst mangler i DiVA

Andre lenker

Forlagets fulltekst

Person

Ahmed, Bestoun S.

Søk i DiVA

Av forfatter/redaktør
Bures, MiroslavAhmed, Bestoun S.Zamli, Kamal Z.
I samme tidsskrift
International journal of software engineering and knowledge engineering

Søk utenfor DiVA

GoogleGoogle Scholar

doi
urn-nbn

Altmetric

doi
urn-nbn
Totalt: 101 treff
RefereraExporteraLink to record
Permanent link

Direct link
Referera
Referensformat
  • apa
  • ieee
  • modern-language-association-8th-edition
  • vancouver
  • apa.csl
  • Annet format
Fler format
Språk
  • de-DE
  • en-GB
  • en-US
  • fi-FI
  • nn-NO
  • nn-NB
  • sv-SE
  • Annet språk
Fler språk
Utmatningsformat
  • html
  • text
  • asciidoc
  • rtf