Open this publication in new window or tab >>2015 (English)In: Journal of Health Organization & Management, ISSN 1477-7266, E-ISSN 1758-7247, Vol. 29, no 6, p. 638-653Article in journal (Refereed) Published
Abstract [en]
Purpose – In order to improve cooperation and collaboration between units, clinics and departments, many health care organizations (HCOs) have introduced process orientation. Several studies indicate problems in realizing these ambitions. The purpose of this paper is to explain and understand the success and failure of process orientation in HCOs.
Design/methodology/approach – The authors conducted three case studies and applied Actor-Network Theory as an analytic lens.
Findings – The realization of process orientation is hindered by neglect or resistance from physicians, who find the process targets to be of low medical priority. However, the authors also see that medical priorities are no stable entities but are susceptible to negotiations. Over time, process organization, process mapping, process measurement activities and the acting of enroled actors may have impact on medical priorities.
Originality/value – Contrary to previous research, the findings indicate that New Public Management may not be the main obstacle against processes, that accounting figures may not be hard to disregard and that the role of leadership is not paramount.
Place, publisher, year, edition, pages
Emerald Group Publishing Limited, 2015
Keywords
Health care, Actor Network Theory, Medical profession, Organization and control
National Category
Business Administration
Research subject
Business Administration
Identifiers
urn:nbn:se:kau:diva-31830 (URN)10.1108/JHOM-09-2013-0186 (DOI)000366627900001 ()26394249 (PubMedID)
Funder
Forte, Swedish Research Council for Health, Working Life and Welfare, 2009-0135
2014-04-022014-04-022021-06-14Bibliographically approved